Two more commissions finished, i’m waiting for the blessing from clients to post them (especially the dragon mawshot…) so in the meantime have my new girl! Felkin babe
❤25❤🔥9

Channel
@rarasden
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
357subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001153859081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rarasden |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 28 February 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rarasden |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 357 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 356 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 356 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (25 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,165 |
| Reactions total | 142 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
459 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 387 | 84.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 40 | 8.71% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 4.58% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 1.31% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.654% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.218% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.218% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 459reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Two more commissions finished, i’m waiting for the blessing from clients to post them (especially the dragon mawshot…) so in the meantime have my new girl! Felkin babe
❤25❤🔥9
➖➖➖〰️〰️〰️➖➖➖ 🤩🤩🤩🤩✏️🤩🤩🤩 〰️ @mortalskull 〰️ 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑔𝑖𝑓𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 〰️ @Raraszek 〰️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐼 𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝐼’𝑚 𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑑 𝐼 𝑑𝑖𝑑, 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝐼 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝐼 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑. 𝐴𝑠 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑝𝑠𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 𝐴 𝑏𝑖𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑜 @TecTheTec 𝑓𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑚𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ…
❤9🔥3
Finished owed portrait commission for Karma ❤️
❤23❤🔥3
Update on the derg mawshot ✨ Can’t wait to render it!
❤12👀4❤🔥2
Finished commission for Nugat ❤️ based on scene from Cyberpunk 2077 Thank you once again! 😸
❤30❤🔥1
Big derg comm wip ✨ Had a rough, stressful week at work, couldn’t rest so most updates left for the weekend and monday. Have a peaceful friday y’all!! ❤️
❤16🔥3👀2
Fast doodles from yesterday with Rara~! Stupid little creature Will get back to remaining messages today after my shift ❤️
❤41
Forgot to charge my iPad at night so no art before job <- idiot Leaving wip of a piece for Ash, love these twoo 💕 And excuse my fuck up with Rudy shitpost 💔
❤25
Spacee 🌌 For Sam ❤️
❤17
Finished lovely couple sketch for Arlexa ❤️
❤34🔥7❤🔥4
Wip of a portrait from old queue for Arlexa ❤️ Beautiful feline character with poppy flowers~
❤24😍3
Raraszek 2026 sketchy ref done between comms, right on her birthday ❤️
❤33❤🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rarasden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 216,497 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rara's Den” (@rarasden), 357 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rarasden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.