Биржа ссылок https://rankexplore.com/
🏠 Ссылки с главных страниц
🌍 Большое количество ГЕО и доменных зон
📅 Гибкие сроки размещения — на 30, 90, 180 или 360 дней.
Поддержка @re_support_l
Новости, акции, кейсы https://t.me/rankexplore
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 06:48
191
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:36
191
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 191 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,169
Reactions total
116
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
119
Videos
1
Links
135
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤝
34
29.3%
👍
30
25.9%
👀
19
16.4%
❤
15
12.9%
✍
5
4.31%
🔥
4
3.45%
😁
4
3.45%
🙏
4
3.45%
👌
1
0.862%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📲 Как отслеживать упоминания бренда в Gemini?
Упоминания в Gemini не отображаются в Search Console и Google Analytics: клиент может узнать о вас через Gemini, а на сайт прийти позже через прямой заход или поисковик
Чтобы измерить видимость бренда, можно комбинировать 3 подхода:
1️⃣ Ручной мониторинг
✔️Составьте библиотеку вопросов для всех этапов воронки
✔️Фиксируйте не только сам факт упоминания, но и позицию, кон…
📢 Bing отключает устаревшие API SOAP/POX
Microsoft объявила о прекращении поддержки устаревших API SOAP и POX/HTTP в Bing Webmaster Tools с 31 августа 2026 года
Что нужно сделать?
Разработчикам и SEO-специалистам необходимо перевести свои сервисы и автоматизации на актуальный JSON/HTTP (REST)
Что НЕ изменится при переходе
✔️Все методы API остаются полностью доступными в JSON/HTTP с аналогичным функционалом
✔️API-к…
Google тестирует вход в аккаунт вместо капчи для проверки на ботов 🤖🔍
Что происходит:
✔️Вместо привычной капчи Google просит пользователей войти в аккаунт, чтобы продолжить поиск
✔️Ограничение появляется при пролистывании выдачи дальше первых страниц. Пользователи заметили это в режиме Incognito в Chrome
✔️Барри Шварц отмечает, что раньше Google такого не делал, и пока ему самому не удалось воспроизвести этот тест…
📌 Запись выпуска RankExplore LIVE с Сергеем Кокшаровым (Devaka) доступна по ссылке
https://youtu.be/ZkbiSKB6Wkc?si=n-09PfDXGjvMyImC
А активного комментатора @thisisnotadrama ждет небольшой подарок экспромтом от биржи RankExplore
Напишите @nekitseo )
👉 Ссылки с главных RankExplore
👉 Вопросы? Пишите @nekitseo
#SEO #LinkBuilding #RankExplore
Барри Шварц сообщает о новой волне волатильности в выдаче Google
Движение зафиксировали в период с 1 по 3 августа
📌 Сервисы отслеживания позиций фиксируют скачки, а в SEO-сообществе активно обсуждают очередную «перетасовку» результатов.
📌 Это же наблюдалось 24 июля и 18–19 июля
Напоминаем: последние подтвержденные апдейты:
June 2026 Spam Update (14–26 июня)
May 2026 Core Update (21 мая – 2 июня)
👉 Тест RankExplo…
Эфир с Сергеем Кокшаровым (Devaka) на RankExplore LIVE стартует через 5 минут ✍️
По ссылке на YouTube
👉 Тест RankExplore
👉 Вопросы? Пишите @nekitseo
#SEO #LinkBuilding #RankExplore
🚀 Завтра, 4 августа, в 11.00 Сергей Кокшаров, Devaka в гостях RankExplore LIVE
Говорим об автоматизации SEO-рутины с помощью AI-агентов ✍️
Подписывайтесь на наш канал YouTube, чтоб не пропустить
👉 Тест RankExplore
👉 Вопросы? Пишите @nekitseo
#SEO #LinkBuilding #RankExplore
🔍Google тестирует новый блок «Related searches based on your browsing» на основе истории браузера
📌 Главные детали
✔️Предполагается, что выдача формируется не только на основе поисковых запросов в Google, но и на основе истории посещенных сайтов (вероятно, через Chrome)
✔️Официального подтверждения пока нет. Возможно, Google экспериментирует лишь с формулировками старых блоков
✔️Первым скриншотами поделился Sachin…
📊 Google официально открыл доступ к аналитике Instagram, TikTok, X (Twitter) и YouTube в Search Console для пользователей по всему миру
Главное
✔️Отчет Insights
Показывает группы поисковых запросов, тренды трафика за последние 28 дней и географию аудитории
✔️Фильтр 24 часа
Помогает в отчете Performance отслеживать резкие скачки трафика на свежих публикациях, пока они на пике актуальности
✔️Экспорт данных
Позволяет…
С 11 июня Page Indexing Report в Google Search Console застревает и не показывает новые ежедневные данные за последние несколько недель 💡
Google пытался это исправить, но в итоге данные продолжают группироваться по неделям, а не по дням
Проблему подтверждают Барри Шварц и SEO-эксперт Броди Кларк, который выделил три периода задержки данных:
✔️ 13 июня – 30 июня (18 дней)
✔️ 1 июля – 10 июля (10 дней)
✔️ 11 июля – 2…
15 августа RankExplore выступает на Just SEO MeetUp Warsaw 🚀
💬 Тема доклада:
"Гемблинг-агрессия: как заходить на рынки Tier-1, когда стандартные SEO-стратегии не работают"
Поговорим о кризисе "классического" SEO в конкурентных вертикалях: что изменилось и какие подходы работают сегодня
✔️ Новые векторы SEO-продвижения в Tier-1
✔️ Креативный линкбилдинг
✔️ Parasite SEO в современных реалиях
✔️ Как адаптироваться к …
❤3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rankexplore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 164,944 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rankexplore named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@thisisnotadrama named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RankExplore - Link Building Marketplace” (@rankexplore), 191 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rankexplore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.