Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مشاور حقوقی شرکت‌ها

@raeisikiacounseling

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

506subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139641721
TypeChannel
Username@raeisikiacounseling
Descriptionویژه مدیران شرکتها و فعالان اقتصادی www.raeisikia.com
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/raeisikiacounseling

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@raeisikiacounseling/725 · this entry5 Nov 2025, 05:50 UTC@borhanpeyman/20705 Nov 2025, 05:51 UTC1.0072 seconds
@raeisikiacounseling/728 · this entry22 Nov 2025, 09:27 UTC@borhanpeyman/207322 Nov 2025, 09:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@raeisikiacounseling/732 · this entry24 Dec 2025, 09:19 UTC@borhanpeyman/207624 Dec 2025, 09:28 UTC1.0010 minutes
@raeisikiacounseling/734 · this entry14 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC@borhanpeyman/207714 Feb 2026, 11:16 UTC1.001.7 hours
@raeisikiacounseling/738 · this entry18 Feb 2026, 14:15 UTC@borhanpeyman/207918 Feb 2026, 14:24 UTC1.0010 minutes
@raeisikiacounseling/741 · this entry2 Jun 2026, 18:38 UTC@borhanpeyman/20842 Jun 2026, 18:41 UTC1.003 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@borhanpeyman15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (150)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 November 2025 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @borhancheque. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5066 Aug 2026, 08:00 — 506 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:34 — 506 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:006 Aug 2026, 18:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 505–507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:34506no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:00506first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.5%
avg views ÷ 506 subscribers
Avg views / post
397
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.756%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (4 November 202531 July 2026)
Views total397
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
1
Links
688

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍934.6%
830.8%
👌519.2%
🙏27.69%
👏13.85%
🤔13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC397 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

اعسار سهامدار شرکت سهامی 1⃣ سهامدار بودن در شرکت‌های سهامی خاص و سهامی عام بخودی خود ، دلیل بر تاجر بودن سهامدار و یا دلیل بر توانمندی و تمکن مالی سهامدار برای پرداخت دیون و تعهدات شخصی اش (ملائت و دارندگی مالی) نیست. 2⃣ به صرف اینکه سهامدار شرکت سهامی خاص یا شرکت سهامی عام هستید تاجر شناخته نمی‌شوید. ✅ بنابراین ؛ اگر سهامدار شرکت‌های سهامی خاص و عام درباره پرداخت بدهی شخصی یا پرداخت هزینه دادرسی مربوط به پرونده ش

2👏1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

16 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC254 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

آغاز ناکارآمدی در هیات مدیره شرکت‌ها ؟! ❓آیا هیات مدیره در شرکت شما نقش کارکردی دارد ؟ سرشت و فلسفه اصلی فعالیت‌های هیات مدیره در شرکت‌ها با پاسخ به این سوال آشکار می‌شود که *هیات مدیره ، چگونه و با چه ذهنیتی بایستی در یک شرکت ، نقش آفرینی کند؟* ✅ با رعایت ۵ اصل زیر ، هیات مدیره شرکت‌ها از آفت و آسیب‌های «تشریفاتی بودن» مبرا خواهند شد و نقش کارکردی هیات مدیره در شرکت‌ها محقق خواهد گردید. 1⃣ برخورداری از استقلال ف

1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

2 Jun 2026, 18:39 UTC554 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

*فرایند رفع مسدودی حساب بانکی در اثر چک برگشتی پس از تکمیل کسر موجودی* ممکن است چک شما بدلیل کسر موجودی ، برگشت بخورد و حساب بانکی شما به همین دلیل، مسدود شود. در این حالت اگر شما اقدام به تکمیل موجودی کنید و دارنده چک با مراجعه دوباره به بانک ، وجه چک برگشتی را از حساب برداشت کند در حقیقت ؛ چک برگشتی به چک پاس شده ، تغییر وضعیت پیدا می‌کند. حالا برای اینکه حساب بانکی شما رفع مسدودی شود در بانک ملی ایران ، فرایند

2👍1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

2 Jun 2026, 18:38 UTC573 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

*نکات حقوقی در شرایط جنگی برای شرکت‌ها * (بخش نخست) 1⃣ بیمه‌نامه‌های شرکت خود را برای برخورداری از پوشش بیمه در شرایط جنگی ، بازبینی کنید. 2⃣ اگر دفاتر ، انبارها ، کارخانه ، ماشین آلات یا سایر دارایی‌ها و کارکنان شرکت ، کلا یا جزئا ، مستقیما با غیرمستقیم ، مورد اصابت یا آسیب قرار گرفتند حتماً و فوراً اقدام به مستندسازی و تهیه گزارش‌ها و صورت‌جلسات لازم نمایید (حسب مورد تهیه و امضای صورتجلسه بوسیله مدیران و کارکنان

1👍1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

2 Jun 2026, 18:38 UTC481 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

شرکت‌های فاقد توانایی منحصربفرد ؟! شرکتی که بر محور «توانایی‌های منحصر بفرد» فعالیت نکند موفق نخواهد شد. هر شرکت برای آنکه به گونه‌ای پایدار ، سودده بماند باید نسبت به شرکتهای رقیب «قابلیت‌های متمایزی» داشته باشد. هنگام بنیانگذاری و در حین فعالیت شرکت ، باید در زمینه تولید و عرضه کالا یا خدماتی که مدنظر دارید دارای توانایی‌های متمایز و خاص نسبت به رقبا باشید. باید نزد مشتریان ، ویژگی‌هایی خلق کنید که خرید از شما

1👍1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

2 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTC182 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❗️ انحلال شرکت، سپر محکمی در برابر مسئولیت مدیران نیست! ❓ آیا فکر می‌کنید با انحلال شرکت، از پاسخگویی در برابر بدهی‌ها و قصورهای مدیریتی خلاص می‌شوید؟ ➖ برابر ماده ۵۴۱ قانون تجارت ، انحلال شرکت هرگز مانع از پیگیری *مسئولیت شخصی و انفرادی * مدیرانی که در ورشکستگی شرکت نقش داشته‌اند، نمی‌شود. ➖ اگر ورشکستگی شرکت ، ناشی از *تقصیر یا سوءمدیریت* باشد، قانون اجازه نمی‌دهد مدیر شرکت ،ذپشت دیوار "شخصیت حقوقی شرکت" پناه بگ

👍1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

1 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC142 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

الگوهای رفتاری شرکت اساسأ این رفتار افراد و کارکنانتان است که رفتار شرکت شما را می‌سازد. رفتار سازمانی را در شرکت خود به گونه‌ای تعریف ، سازماندهی ، ترویج و پیاده‌سازی کنید که *برای حرکت دادن شرکت به جلو اقدام کنند نه برای نگه داشتن شرکت در جایی که هست.* کارکنان شرکت را به گونه‌ای آموزش بدهید که *کارهای درست را بی‌درنگ ، انجام بدهند.* تقسیم کار و محول کردن وظیفه خاص به هر یک از کارکنان ، چیز خوبی است اما ضرورت دا

👍1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

18 Feb 2026, 14:15 UTC650 viewsread 6 August 2026

بازگشت به‌کار درباره کارگران شرکت منحله درباره شرکت‌ منحله و هم‌چنین شرکت ورشکسته (که صرفاً برای رسیدگی به حساب‌ها و عملیات باقیمانده ، از طریق مدیر تصفیه ، کنترل و مدیریت می‌شوند) هیأت‌های تشخیص و حل اختلاف موضوع قانون کار نمی‌توانند رای بازگشت به‌کار برای کارمندان و کارگران آنها صادر کنند. زیرا از دیدگاه قانونی و تجاری ، شرکت‌های ورشکسته و منحله ، صرفا برای اداره امور باقیمانده و پایان دادن به آنها مجاز به فعالیت

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

15 Feb 2026, 06:25 UTC615 viewsread 6 August 2026

ماهیت و مفهوم اختلاس در شرکت‌ها و بانک‌های دولتی نوشتاری درباره الزامات بهداشت حقوقی و نکات حقوقی کاربردی و برجسته برای مدیران و کارکنان شرکت‌ها و بانک‌های دولتی پیرامون جرم اختلاس نوشتار یادشده را در پیوند زیر مطالعه فرمایید 👇 https://raesikia.com/category/company-legal-issues/ ♦️ مشاوره و خدمات حقوقی و مدیریتی ویژهِ شرکتها 📩 پیامک، بله ، واتساپ ، تلگرام 👇 🔹09123836621 ☎️ تماس برای رزرو نوبت مشاوره 👇 ☎️ 02

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

14 Feb 2026, 12:26 UTC351 viewsread 6 August 2026

مفهوم اختلاس در شرکت دولتی !؟ اگر مسئولان یا کارمندان شرکت‌های دولتی (از جمله بانک‌های دولتی) وجوه نقدی یا مطالبات یا حواله‌ها یا سهام و اسناد و اوراق بهادار و یا سایر اموال متعلق به شرکت دولتی یا وجوه و اموال مردم و و وجوه و اموال متعلق به اشخاص دیگر که بر حسب وظیفه به مسئولان و کارمندان دولت ، سپرده شده است (همانند وجوه و اموال توقیفی، یا ضمانتنامه‌ها و همانند اینها) را به نفع خود یا به نفع شخص دیگری ، برداشت و تص

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

14 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC174 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @borhanmaliyat

مالیات بر خودروهای گران‌قیمت(لوکس) در سال ۱۴۰۵ در قانون بودجه سال ۱۴۰۵ که هم‌اکنون در مجلس شورای اسلامی در حال بررسی و رسیدگی می‌باشد پیش‌بینی شده است که نرخ مالیات بر انواع خودروی سواری و وانت دواتاق (دوکابین) گران‌قیمت که دارای شماره انتظامی شخصی هستند مازاد بر مبلغ هفت و نیم میلیارد تومان ، برابر با یک درصد ارزش خودرو باشد. ♦️ مرکز دفاع از حقوق مالیاتی کسب‌و‌کارهای ایران (ساوایران) تماس برای هماهنگی و رزرو نوبت

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

24 Dec 2025, 09:19 UTC925 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

توقیف حساب بانکی مدیران شرکتها به وسیله تامین اجتماعی !؟ ❇️ چند نکته بسیار مهم که مدیران شرکت‌ها در رابطه با سازمان تامین اجتماعی باید بدانند 👇 1⃣ اگر شرکت‌ها (و همه کارفرمایان) نسبت به میزان حق بیمه و خسارت مطالبه شده از سوی سازمان تامین اجتماعی ، اعتراض داشته باشند بایستی حداکثر ظرف ۳۰ روز از تاریخ ابلاغ برگه مطالبه حق بیمه و خسارت، اعتراض خود را به هیئت بدوی تشخیص مطالبات سازمان تامین اجتماعی تسلیم نمایند تا مور

👌1

Signed صادق رئیسی کیا

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raeisikiacounseling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 26,967 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مشاور حقوقی شرکت‌ها” (@raeisikiacounseling), 506 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raeisikiacounseling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.