Channel
@radshobhi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
329subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002052943714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @radshobhi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/radshobhi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 329 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 330 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 330 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 September 2025 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 393 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
از بدترین اشکال فریب و خیانت زمانی است که پزشکان و رقیهخوانان از مشکل مراجعین سوء استفاده میکنند و برای معالجهٔ کسانی که بچه دار نمیشوند یا سرطان دارند و یا دچار سحر و چشمزخم شدهاند، گیاهان و داروهایی را توصیه میکنند و به آنان میفروشند که هیچ گونه ارتباطی با مریضی مراجعین ندارد. ☑️شیخ محمد صالح المنجد 😀http://t.me/almonajjed
در حدیث متفق علیه آمده است: «لا عَدْوَى ولا طِيَرَةَ، ولا هامَةَ ولا صَفَرَ» (سرایت مستقل بیماری، فال بد، هامه و صفر (به عنوان نشانهٔ بدیمنی) وجود ندارد.) مردم در دوران جاهلیت، ماه صفر را بدیمن میدانستند و از سفر کردن و ازدواج در آن پرهیز میکردند. اسلام این باور خرافی را باطل کرد بنابراین نمیگوییم: «صَفَرِ خیر» زیرا این تعبیر نیز بر پایهٔ همان پیوند دادن ماه صفر با خیر و شر است. ماه صفر مانند دیگر ماههاست؛ نه شو…
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم سوال :ماهیت رقیه شرعیه چیست السلام علیکم و رحمهالله و برکاته 📝 در ابتدا باید گفت؛ «رقیه» در زبان عربی به معنای دعا خواندن و دمیدن برای شفا (دعادرمانی) است. انسان میتواند هم برای خود و هم برای دیگران رقیه بخواند؛ به عنوان مثال: خواندن نامهای خداوند و برخی دعاهای خاص که خواندن آنها برای درمان بیماریها مفید است، و سپس دمیدن آن بر خود یا دیگری. کسب شفا از طریق خواندن، شنیدن و دمیدن آیات …
❤1
امام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله فرمودند: «هر کس با داروهای حرام (یا پلید) طلب شفا کند، این نشاندهنده بیماری قلب او و ایمانش است؛ زیرا اگر او از امت مؤمن پیامبر اسلام صلی الله علیه وسلم بود، خداوند شفای او را در چیزی که بر او حرام کرده بود، قرار نمیداد.» [مجموع الفتاوى، ج ۲۴، ص ۲۷۵] کانال رد شبهات راقیان بدعتی وساحران https://t.me/radshobhi
اثبات سحر ،چشم زخم وحسد از طریق علمی #معجزه علمی قرآن کانال رد شبهات راقیان بدعتی وساحران https://t.me/radshobhi
☑️ سلسله درس های بیداری اسلامی 👤 استاد: مفتی عبدالرحمن احراری 🎙 موضوع: چگونه در نماز حضور قلب داشته باشیم؟ ⏰ مدت ارائه: 23 دقیقه لطفا همه گوش بدهید و عمل کنید… نشر صدقه جاریه
🔴رد بر خرافات و سوءاستفاده از آیات قرآن در موضوع جلوگیری از سقط جنین🔴 متأسفانه امروزه برخی افراد به ظاهر دلسوز و مذهبی، با نشر توصیهها و نسخههای بیاساس در شبکههای اجتماعی و کانالهای تلگرامی، مردم را دچار اشتباه و انحراف میسازند و آیات قرآن کریم را وسیلهی خرافات، بازی و تمسخر قرار میدهند؛ در حالیکه چنین اعمالی هیچ اصل و مدخلی در شریعت پاک اسلام ندارد، بلکه از امور مردود، مذموم و گاهی خطرناک در عقیده به شمار …
❤1
روز ایمان عید قربان آمده برترین عید مسلمان آمده روز ترجیح خدا بر غیراوست روز مردودی شیطان آمده عیدقربان بر تمام مسلمین جهان مبارک باد
❤1
خرافهٔ سحر ارثی بهشدت در شگفتم از برخی راقیان بدعتی که خداوند ما و آنان را به راه درست هدایت کند کسانی که سالهاست به رقیهدرمانی مشغولاند، اما متأسفانه هنوز هم شدت و گسترهٔ بیماری و اسباب آن را بزرگنمایی میکنند و بیماران را با حدس و گمان، غیبگویی، و برخی تشخیصهایی که بیشترشان بر ادعاهای شیاطین استوار است، یا با تقلید از کسانی که از آنان آموختهاند (از راه استقرا و پیگیریهای اینترنتی)، گمراه میسازند. 🔻 آنا…
❤3
تصوف چیست؟ | صوفی کیست؟ | طریقت چیست؟ | سخنرانی جدید مولانا بهزاد فقهی ❤️
❤3
#صوتی 🌿کلید #رهایی از همه #مشکلات به اذن #الله 🔷شش ذکر #مشکل گشا حتما گوش بدین و نشر بدین ان شاءالله 🔸عبدالطیف محمدی
✍ نسخه های معنوی درمان بیماری ها ▫️ در این شرایطی که متاسفانه بیماری ها زیاد شده، برای شفا و درمان بیماری ها از این نسخه های شفابخش استفاده کنیم. 👈 چرا که شفا و درمان در دست الله هست. نشر صدقه جاریه
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @radshobhi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 243,156 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال رد شبهات راقیان بدعتی وساحران” (@radshobhi), 329 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radshobhi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.