3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:14
265
+3
8 Aug 2026, 09:04
262
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:18
262
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.48%
avg views ÷ 265 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.1
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 April 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
226
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 46s
Average length
13m 46s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
83.3%
🔥
1
16.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أفضل طبعات كتب الحديث
الحمد لله وبه نستعين :
١- صحيح البخاري : الطبعة الأميرية تحقيق وإشراف : محمد زهير الناصر، أو دار التأصيل الطبعة الثانية، وقد استدرك على الطبعة الأولى بعض السقط، إلا إن ظهرت طبعة دار السنَّة للعمران.
٢- صحيح مسلم : طبعة العامرة دار المنهاج، أو تحقيق نظر الفاريابي.
٣- سنن النسائي : الكبرى والمجتبى. دار التأصيل.
٤- سنن أبي داود : دار التأصيل. نسخ معتمدة رواية اللؤلؤي ورواية ابن داسة.
٥- جامع التر…
كيف يحصٌل للإنسان اليقين في القلب والثبات في العمل؟
الحمد لله وحده..
هذا فضل الله يؤتيه من يشاء، ومن سعي الإنسان إلى هذا وطلبه لحصوله= أن يقرأ القرآن فهمًا وتدبرًا، وأن يتدبر آيات الله في الأنفس والآفاق وأن يعمل بالعلم، واعلم أن العمل والطاعة وإدامتها، وإدامة الرغب إلى الله بالعبادة وبالذكر والدعاء= من أعظم ما يثبت النفس والقلب.
يقول تعالى: ولو أنهم فعلوا ما يوعظون به لكان خيرًا لهم وأشد تثبيتًا.
Some realities
There are 2 widespread definitions of taqlid:
1-adopting someone else’s view without reasonable conviction that it is the truth from Allah. This is Ibnu Hazm’s conception of taqlid, although he allows laymen to go to any mufti who gives fatawa according to his true convictions about the literal meanings of the Qur’an, sunnah and ijma3. “The ijtihād of the common person is that, when he asks a scholar…
🧑 Questioner: Then explain this:
Qur'an 4:83
"And when there comes to them something [i.e., information] about [public] security or fear, they spread it around. But if they had referred it back to the Messenger or to those of authority among them, then the ones who [can] draw correct conclusions [istimbat استنباط] from it would have known about it."
❓ Who are those experts Allah mentions?
❓ Why did Allah appoint them…
Funny Pseudo-Ẓāhirī (Fanatical Muqallid) Shoots Himself in the Foot (part 1/2)
📖 Background
The funny one claims the four madhhabs are misguided because they don't follow the "Qur'an and Sunnah only" (whatever that means). 🚩
Claims Muslims shouldn't make taqlīd of scholars. ❌📚
Also argues Ibn Tūmart didn't claim to be the Mahdī—just that mahdī meant "guided" or "leader." Worse part is that Ibn Tumart adopted qiyas …
"جزى الله خيرا الشيخ محمد محمود آل خضير على كتابه العمدة "الإيمان عند السلف" فقد رأب صدوعًا ورتق فتوقًا تدسس منها إرجاءٌ فاح من مواضع في الجزيرة ومصر والشام على أيدٍ لا علاقة لها بتخصص العقيدة فبدد أوهام أهلها بكتابه وحطم شبهاتهم وذراها هشيما"
ماهر أمير، مؤلف كتاب (الانتصار للتدمرية)
الصورة من النت.
-visit mosques often for daily prayers, the Friday one, lectures and activities—accomplish every prayer you at the mosque for multiplied reward (27 times more for congregational prayer).
-train on mentioning Allāh through dhikr so that you remember him in hardships; get yourself a supplications/invocations booklet. Saying Astaghfiru 'Llāh, sending Salawāt, lā hawla wa lā quwwata illā bi-'Llāh and saying Lā ilāha ill…
Advice for a convert who came back to Islām after apostasy
#q_and_a
Congratulations and welcome back! Next time, instead of apostacising, know that you none is a perfect Muslim. You'd rather die and roast in Hellfire for a while (as a Muslim) than forever. "Perhaps (often) will those who disbelieve wish that they were Muslims [those who have submitted themselves to Allah's Will in Islam Islamic Monotheism, this will…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quraanic_phil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Yes, but only those who are genuinely ignorant and brainwashed0%
Yes, but the knowledgeable ones are usually not0%
Yes, but their scholars are not0%
Madkhalism is kufr for opposing ijmā3 without excuse or good faith0%
Madkhalism is just deviance, but not kufr50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 852,303 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“House of Sciences and Tazkiyah (soul purification) دار العلوم والتزكية (Athari Philosopher) الفيلسوف الأثري القرآني” (@quraanic_phil), 265 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quraanic_phil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
