Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

QUERDENKEN (234 - BOCHUM) ⎜ INFO Kanal

@querdenken_234

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603989885
TypeChannel
Username@querdenken_234
DescriptionHier erfahrt ihr, was in unserer Initiative passiert und was wir bewegen! Kanäle & Gruppen: @querdenken_234 - INFO-Kanal @querdenken234 - Diskussion & Austausch @querdenken234_aktiv - Bilder und Videos von Demos in 234 - BOCHUM https://querdenken-234.de
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/querdenken_234

Growth

1906 Aug 2026, 11:45 — 190 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:15 — 190 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:457 Aug 2026, 07:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189–191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:15190no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45190first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
183.0%
avg views ÷ 190 subscribers
Avg views / post
348
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.356%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (14 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total6,258
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
465
Videos
202
Links
672

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎633.3%
🔥422.2%
316.7%
👍211.1%
🙏211.1%
👌15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC174 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👌1👎1

29 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC203 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq-a_UAJScw

🙏2👍1

28 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MartinSchwabPhoto

DOPPELMORAL IN BERLINS STRAFJUSTIZ Bild links: Schuldspruch wegen Verwendens von NS-Symbolen (Kammergericht Berlin, Urteil vom 30.9.2024 – 2 ORs 14/24) Bild rechts: Keine Ermittlungen. Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin, Verfügung vom 10.7.2026 – 171 Zs 38/26, dokumentiert bei Haintz Media vom 25.7.2026, https://haintz.media/artikel/recht/neues-von-der-sta-berlin-die-mit-ihrem-massengeschaeft-ueberfordert-ist/ Die E

2🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC158 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ACHTUNG neuer Kundgebungsort ‼️ Die Standdemo am 25.07.2026 wird nicht wie geplant am Dr.-Ruer-Platz stattfinden sondern am Husemannplatz.

👎1

21 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polifa_channel

https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/07/19/fast-vier-jahre-reichsbuerger-prozess-wie-sich-der-staat-selbst-seine-rechten-putschisten-bastelt/ "Die Mitglieder setzen sich für die Wertekultur der staatsbürgerlichen Rechte einer freiheitlich, demokratischen Gesellschaft & deren Grundrechte ein." @polifa_channel

21 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @horizont_telegramVideo

Alle 29 anwesenden Abgeordneten von CDU und CSU haben am 09.07.2026 im Europäischen Parlament für die Chatkontrolle gestimmt. Seitdem herrscht dröhnendes Schweigen bei Jens Spahn. 07.10.2025: „Wir als CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion sind gegen die anlasslose Kontrolle von Chats.“

21 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Herr Lauterbach hat doch immer gesagt: „Der Impfstoff ist Nebenwirkungsfrei“ Biontech gibt jetzt auf ihrem Beipackzettel zu, dass Todesfälle nach der Impfung beobachtet wurden. Zu lesen unter dem Punkt 4.4 „Besondere Warnhinweise und Vorsichtsmaßnahmen für die Anwendung“ steht unter „Allgemeine Empfehlung“ - „... es wurden Fälle mit Todesfolge beobachtet.“ Zum selber kontrollieren - hier ist der link zur offiziell

🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ich dachte ja wir werden alle sterben ABER: „Ärztliche Meldepflicht auf COVID-19 wird vollständig annulliert“ Hmm – war wohl doch nicht so gefährlich wie erzählt https://www.aerztezeitung.de/Wirtschaft/Aerztliche-Meldepflicht-auf-COVID-19-wird-vollstaendig-annulliert--463139.html

1

20 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC85 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Klima_kanalPhoto

THEMA Die Entkopplung von CO2 und Klima Im Internationalen Journal für Geowissenschaften (Scientific Research Publishing, kurz -SCIRP) Band 15 vom 3. März 2024 wird die Studie des unabhängigen Wissenschaftlers Graniti Bay aus den USA vorgestellt. Er vergleicht die Erdtemperaturen und die CO2-Konzentration der Atmosphäre über die letzten 600 Mio. Jahre. Das Fazit: Es gibt keine Korrelation zwischen den beiden Größ

18 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,670 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ACHTUNG neuer Kundgebungsort ‼️ Die Standdemo am 25.07.2026 wird nicht wie geplant am Dr.-Ruer-Platz stattfinden sondern am Husemannplatz.

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @querdenken_234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 361,345 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QUERDENKEN (234 - BOCHUM) ⎜ INFO Kanal” (@querdenken_234), 190 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/querdenken_234.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.