Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Klima Kanal

Channel

Klima Kanal

@Klima_kanal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,024subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001848332234
TypeChannel
Username@Klima_kanal
Created16 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Klima_kanal

Growth

2,9873,0243,005.56 August 2026 — 2,987 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,987 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,998 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,009 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,024 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,981–3,030 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:353,024+15
13 Aug 2026, 12:163,009+11
10 Aug 2026, 05:252,998+11
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,987no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:462,987first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.4%
avg views ÷ 3,024 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.798%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (1 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total16,800
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 20s
Average length
4m 10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

272 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15356.3%
8531.3%
🔥186.62%
🤪51.84%
💯31.10%
🤔31.10%
👏20.735%
❤‍🔥10.368%
🤣10.368%
🤩10.368%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC≈1,160 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

THEMA Naturkatastrophen & Extremwetter - Vergest den ' Klimawandel ', 96 % der europäischen Waldbrände entstehen durch den Menschen. Die wissenschaftliche Literatur ist in diesem Punkt sehr eindeutig: Ein Wald- oder Vegetationsbrand benötigt eine Zündquelle. In Europa stammen diese Zündungen überwiegend vom Menschen. Natürliche Zündquellen sind selten und bestehen nahezu ausschließlich aus Blitzschlägen. Vulkanismus

👍146🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,240 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thema Naturkatastrophen & Extremwetter - Waldbrände in Grichenland 2026 Der große Waldbrand in der Region Attika in Griechenland soll durch Funken eines Stromkabels ausgelöst worden sein. Das Stromkabel transportiert Strom, der durch Windräder erzeugt wurde, in das Hauptnetz. Zwei Männer wurden festgenommen, wie AP News berichtet. Das Feuer begann in der Region Böotien und breitete sich nach Attika aus. Laut der g

🤪52👍2

30 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,450 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

THEMA Temperaturen der Vergangenheit Laut 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡 leben wir in der kältesten Zeit der letzten 485 Mio. Jahre. Die Zeitung findet das erstaunlich, aber wer behauptet, die Erde verbrenne, kennt die geschichtliche Entwicklung der Temperaturen auf der Erde nicht. Wo sind wir?? Am Ende der roten Linie auf der rechten Seite der Grafik. Es ist Fakt... es war nie kälter... dazu muss gesagt werden, dass wir uns aktu

👍15🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC≈2,570 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

THEMA Historische Kälte in der Antarktis gemessen. Mit -84,1 Grad Celsius wurde letzte Woche in der Antarktis die niedrigste Temperatur gemessen, die seit 2012 irgendwo auf der Erde registriert wurde. Anders als über Hitzerekorde berichten die Mainstream-Meteorologen nicht darüber. Laut einer Visualisierung des Wetterportals Ventusky markiert der Wert von -84,1 °C die kälteste Messung seit fast 15 Jahren. Zum Vergl

👍207

20 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,800 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Des Geyers schwarzer Haufen 🔥 👉 Dein Kanal für unbequeme Wahrheiten aus Deutschland. Während die großen Medien vieles verschweigen oder kleinreden, decken wir die Missstände im Land auf, die sonst kaum Aufmerksamkeit bekommen: ⚡️ Politische Skandale ⚡️ Soziale Ungerechtigkeiten ⚡️ Versagen von Behörden & Institutionen ⚡️ Stimmen, die sonst nicht gehört werden 📢 Klar. Direkt. Unabhängig. Schließe dich dem schwarze

🔥43👍3

20 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈2,150 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thema Mehr Sonne - weniger Wolken, es wird wärmer Seit 1995 erreicht mehr Sonnenlicht den Boden, das führt zu höheren Temperaturen. Die Ursache ist, dass die Luft als solche immer sauberer wird, die Anzahl kleiner Verschmutzungspartikel in der Luft nimmt ab, somit wird weniger Strahlung von diesen Partikeln in den Orbit zurückgeworfen und es bilden sich weniger Wolken an den Partikeln. Aber wieso???? 1975 beschlos

15🤔3

20 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC≈4,480 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

THEMA Die Entkopplung von CO2 und Klima Im Internationalen Journal für Geowissenschaften (Scientific Research Publishing, kurz -SCIRP) Band 15 vom 3. März 2024 wird die Studie des unabhängigen Wissenschaftlers Graniti Bay aus den USA vorgestellt. Er vergleicht die Erdtemperaturen und die CO2-Konzentration der Atmosphäre über die letzten 600 Mio. Jahre. Das Fazit: Es gibt keine Korrelation zwischen den beiden Größ

👍152🔥2

19 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,950 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

THEMA Sonne - Erde, mal was Wesentliches Um zu zeigen, in welchen Dimensionen wir uns bewegen, einmal eine kleine Größeneinordnung. Die Größen im direkten Vergleich: Objekt Durchmesser Erde 12.742 km Durchmesser Sonne 1.391.000 km Abstand Erde–Sonne (mittlerer Abstand) 149.600.000 km Daraus ergeben sich die wichtigsten Verhältnisse: Die Sonne hat einen etwa 109,2-mal größeren Durchmesser als die Erde. Der Absta

7👍5

17 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC≈4,210 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thema Was uns 1.000 Jahre Baumringe über das Klima verraten Eine aktuelle Studie internationaler Forscher liefert eine der präzisesten Rekonstruktionen der Sonnenaktivität für die Zeit von 1 bis 970 CE. Die Arbeit basiert auf jährlich aufgelösten Radiokohlenstoff-Messungen in Baumringen und zeigt deutliche Phasen reduzierter Sonnenaktivität sowie vier mögliche solare Teilchenereignisse. Die Studie zeigt mit einer K

👍106🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC≈9,060 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

THEMA Energiepolitik - Co2 Zertifikatshandel mal ganz einfach. Dieser Beitrag ist ein rund 6 Minuten langer satirischer Ausschnitt aus der ZDF-Sendung Die Anstalt. Anhand eines Schaubilds wird der CO₂-Zertifikatehandel erläutert und dessen Funktionsweise dargestellt. Unser Themenschwerpunkt: Co2 & Co Unser Themenschwerpunkt: Energiepolitik Unser Kanal: http://t.me/Klima_kanal

👍113❤‍🔥1🤩1

9 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,660 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Sonnenaufgang: Die Wahrheit sucht sich ihren Weg!! THEMA Grundlegende Argumente gegen den ' menschengemachten Klimawandel '. 1. In der Vergangenheit war die CO₂-Konzentration in der Atmosphäre viel höher als heute. Trotzdem waren die Temperaturen nie höher oder tiefer als die der „normalen“ Eis- und Warmzeiten. Zum Thema. 2. Das CO₂ bedingt nicht die Temperatur, sondern die Temperatur das CO₂. Zum Thema. 3. Die

👍132👏1🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 23:10 UTC≈1,640 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Des Geyers schwarzer Haufen 🔥 👉 Dein Kanal für unbequeme Wahrheiten aus Deutschland. Während die großen Medien vieles verschweigen oder kleinreden, decken wir die Missstände im Land auf, die sonst kaum Aufmerksamkeit bekommen: ⚡️ Politische Skandale ⚡️ Soziale Ungerechtigkeiten ⚡️ Versagen von Behörden & Institutionen ⚡️ Stimmen, die sonst nicht gehört werden 📢 Klar. Direkt. Unabhängig. Schließe dich dem schwarze

11🔥5👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Klima_kanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 44,016 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Klima Kanal” (@Klima_kanal), 3,024 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Klima_kanal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.