Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QuarkBeat

Channel

QuarkBeat

@quarkbeat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003409865031
TypeChannel
Username@quarkbeat
DescriptionThis is the Telegram group for QuarkBeat Centre for Teaching, QuarkBeat.com
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/quarkbeat

Growth

1410 Aug 2026, 20:17 — 14 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:00 — 14 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:1712 Aug 2026, 01:00
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:0014no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:1714first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held17 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total8
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,200
Videos
1,530
Links
866

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @holybitchmotherdingo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hyTh1KoZhU

3 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026

(Stonehenge part 5) The Salisbury Plain Training Area contains all these facilities and is the largest military training area in the United Kingdom, managed by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation on behalf of the British Ministry of Defence. Still wanting to visit the innocent prehistoric megaliths? Having examined compelling evidence that certain members of treacherous Albion established important parts of hu

3 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

(Stonehenge part 4) The 12 hectares (30 acres) falsely donated by the fictional Lord Chubb-Walt Disney for the construction of the theme park known as Stonehenge was an small area located 300 meters (980 feet) from the large stone and brick hangars dominating the landscape of Stonehenge Military Airfield, used for the training of bomber pilots at the No 1 School of Aerial Navigation and Bomb Dropping. The airfield w

3 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

(Stonehenge part 3) Like Italy, Great Britain is an artificial island in need of water for transportation, communication, and security. Their saltwater treatment plants must have given the Grey Anglo-Saxons the brilliant idea of ​​transforming them into sports or theater arenas to profit from that as well, while burying the original function of these structures as well as the authors of their construction. After th

3 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

(Stonehenge part 2) By handing over all of London's surroundings to the military, the Grey would simply be copying the Army Civilization, which built star-shaped fortresses around the capitals of major provinces to defend them from any attack, a perfect strategy that I demonstrated when I wrote the history of the fall of French Prussia, also presenting the gigantic defensive lines around Paris. Following this logic

3 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Imagine the exult when the Grey saw the dawn of the day when all the riches of Eden were in their hands. Would the division among them have been complex, without fighting? I think it happened in a peculiar way. Let's suppose there were only thirteen of them and that they quickly reached an agreement. Once the division was made, what to do with the vast lands near London, the downlands of Salisbury Plain, now under th

3 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

(Thatcher part 2) Two or three, with the help of about five or six others, successfully ruled the world after the 1940s. Who were Roy Disney, Gerald Ford, Allen Dulles, Arthur C. Clarke, Clark Kent the Superman, and Maynard Keynes if not Alan Greenspan, the political and financial advisor to all presidents, whose reign lasted about 80 years, rewarded with a seat on the Federal Reserve and architect of the collapse o

3 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

How did it all begin? Did the Army's Civilization somehow foresee an attack from its arch-enemies abroad? Would this explain the large influx of immigrants from Central Prussia to peripheral regions, further from the epicenter where major disturbances were predicted at the end of the 19th century? There seems to have been an incentive for immigration from coastal islands of Portugal, the Italian peninsula, and Centra

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @quarkbeat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QuarkBeat” (@quarkbeat), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quarkbeat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.