Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

QRZ 的摸鱼日常

@qrzbing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001174670438
TypeChannel
Username@qrzbing
Description人生苦短,及时行乐 @qrzsec 安全文章推送 @opera_epiclese 米家游戏角色图片收集
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/qrzbing

Growth

647 August 2026 — 64 subscribers10 August 2026 — 64 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:4764no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:0964first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
163.7%
avg views ÷ 64 subscribers
Avg views / post
105
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (14 January 20267 August 2026)
Views total419
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
502
Videos
10
Links
256

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#llm 实测 qwen3.8 ¥139的套餐周限额就 $20 左右 (输入$2/M,输出$6/2M,缓存读$0.25/M,缓存创建$2.5/M,newapi) 我使用Claude code作为agent,缓存命中率85%到88%之间 额度太少了,相比 ChatGPT plus 完全没有竞争力

5 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC320 viewsread 10 August 2026

美国人底层代码这一块…… https://telegra.ph/如何看待-Anthropic-公布-Claude-也发生了沙箱逃逸真实入侵了三家机构-08-02

4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC21 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

感觉 NixOS 很适合放在虚拟机 / 服务器上跑,出了啥问题都是 LLM 解决,回滚也方便,打算尝试在此基础上构建一些工作流了。

17 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTC63 viewsread 10 August 2026

自从买了端馈之后,每次周末想拉天线都会有事/下雨,人麻了😭😭

16 Jun 2026, 07:13 UTC64 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @hacker_news_zh

为一个人而写 原文:https://wizardzines.com/comics/write-for-one-person/ 阅读时间:1 分钟 分数:263

28 May 2026, 16:49 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @hatschannel

TL;DR: Opus 4.8 已在 claude code (2.1.154) + 官方订阅中发布,并重置了 claude plan 限额 read more: https://fixupx.com/wesbos/status/2060030710614839532

19 May 2026, 02:23 UTC66 viewsread 10 August 2026

#今天看了啥 #mihomo mihomo 现已支持 tailscale 出站 https://github.com/MetaCubeX/mihomo/releases/tag/v1.19.25

17 May 2026, 11:59 UTC45 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @hacker_news_zh

前沿 AI 彻底破坏了公开 CTF 模式 原文:https://kabir.au/blog/the-ctf-scene-is-dead 阅读时间:8 分钟 分数:388

17 May 2026, 08:50 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026

#今天看了啥 AionCLI 这个时代人们要么想做自己的 Agent,例如 OpenClaw、Hermes;要么为 Agents 做编排,例如 AionUI 和各类编辑器的内置 Agent 管理器。 AionUI 的优点在于它尝试统一所有 Agent,支持 Cowork 并提供 Web 服务,这样可以让人们随时随地操作和编排。缺点在于现在代码的逻辑全都写在 electron app 中了,对 serverless 支持极差,代码质量也不算很好。 AionCLI 看上去是抽出 AionUI 的逻辑,单独实现的后端。如果未来成熟的话我认为不局限给 AionUI 使用,其他用户也可以根据自己的需求进行定制,这是正确的方向。

17 May 2026, 08:25 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

#今天看了啥 zed-android-port Zed 的安卓移植概念验证。我最近几个月一直在使用 Zed 进行开发和研究,它的 AI 集成工作流是我见过的编辑器中设计的最好的。尽管目前安卓移植还有各种各样的问题,但我认为未来可期。

14 May 2026, 08:13 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026

观察了几天,应该是家里的 Windows 机器点击不明可执行程序导致的。还好我现在大部分时间只用那一台电脑打游戏,只有 tg 账号遭了殃…

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qrzbing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QRZ 的摸鱼日常” (@qrzbing), 64 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qrzbing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.