害我笑了一下。
😁5

Channel
@limisay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,281subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001283701973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @limisay |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/limisay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 3,281 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 3,273 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 3,262 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 3,264 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,243 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
43 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 29 | 67.4% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 18.6% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
害我笑了一下。
😁5
https://x.com/Andr3jH/status/2085368832403587542
😁2
跳不了一点,史上最严格kyc
制式仪刀: jandan.net/t/6190288 OO: 144 XX: 6 场地湿滑: 我知道了…… OO: 15, XX: 0 from 煎蛋无聊图 via Pika喵
https://us.ovhcloud.com/vps/#config 开始跳车。
👀1
我在 plasma 花了 500u 了,怎么还不给个邀请码?
在接下来的一整年,我们不谈发展,不搞创新,每天张开眼,先看销量是否下降。 一周换好几个法子,推 Office 的文章。 每月的销售目标,压的我们喘不过气来,无心发展任何其他业务。 据我所知,当年一共有 X 家签了这个协议,大家为了各自的销售目标,疯狂压价。 先是 —— 你赚 30 元?好,那我降价只赚 15 元。 然后 —— 只要不亏本就好。 最后 —— 离季度销售目标还差点,亏本再卖 200 套就能完成了。 然后每个月初,账上看上去钱挺多,瞬间全用来进货 Office,再要翻倍倒贴进去。 ... 被反复抽打了一整年后,终于结束了。 ------------ 至于「数码荔枝」后来是怎么挺过来,其实很简单,因为我家里人掏出一百多万填进去了。 再往后的多年,慢慢还。 https://fixupx.com/DIGITALYCHEE/status/2085395617942327364
😱7
https://shadcn-templ.com/
Posted without readable text
https://x.com/zach_coredump/status/2085508344887091297 哎,几乎每次跟父母聊到工作和投资这块总会吵架,父母辈完全无法理解为什么会亏损的东西要碰,为什么不能老老实实定存。以及上班不快乐疲惫不快乐,他们会说你看现在国内年轻人都没工作你有个就不错了,我们那时候不也是工作一直到退休。他们不理解工作带来的精神压力和困顿,无法理解精神需求,更无法理解为什么我有那么多想法为什么不能一个工作干到退休后再享乐(他们都退休了但是并没有真享乐)。他们这辈人无法理解理解现代人的困顿,不理解心理健康问题以及精神压力,觉得只要定期给我钱怎么样都无所谓,更不理解我们这代人对于精神世界对于个人理想的需求
拼刀子罢了……100u 我都能玩得很兴奋…… https://x.com/erchenlu1/status/2085351155022897294
虽然有点陈词滥调,但是看到南京的一个还算市区的房子腰斩,我只能多谢不杀之恩。4w 变成 2.5w,三年蒸发 150w
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @limisay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 125,912 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“厘米碎碎念” (@limisay), 3,281 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/limisay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.