Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

先生/小姐

@qiongq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003918724778
TypeChannel
Username@qiongq
Created20 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/qiongq

Growth

410 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:484no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:464first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1933.3%
avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held6 (20 April 202619 July 2026)
Views total232
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 04:21 UTC78 viewsread 13 August 2026

导航分类,点击直接跳转 先生 - 小姐 点击直接跳转

19 Jul 2026, 04:21 UTC76 viewsread 13 August 2026

小姐 @aoxiaojie 138 敖小姐 @bangxiaojie 108 班小姐 @beixiaojie 168 北小姐 @boxiaojie 128 波小姐 @canxiaojie 108 灿小姐 @cengxiaojie 138 曾小姐 @cenxiaojie 108 岑小姐 @chanxiaojie 108 产小姐 馋小姐 @chaxiaojie 138 茶小姐 @chouxiaojie 108 丑小姐 @chuaixiaojie 138 初爱小姐 @chuxiaojie 198 楚小姐 @cixiaojie 138 辞小姐 @danxiaojie 138 单小姐 @diexiaojie 168 蝶小姐 @dunxiaojie 108 顿小姐 @enxiaojie 168 恩小姐 @feixiaojie 168 菲小姐 @gaixiaojie 108 盖小姐 @gangxiaojie 108 甘小姐 @g

20 Apr 2026, 18:21 UTC43 viewsread 13 August 2026

先生 @bangxiansheng 138 邦先生 @banxiansheng 108 板先生 @biaoxiansheng 138 彪先生 @binxiansheng 138 彬先生 斌先生 @buxiansheng 138 布先生 @cengxiansheng 138 曾先生 @cexiansheng 138 策先生 @chongxiansheng 108 虫先生 @chouxiansheng 108 臭先生 @chuixiansheng 108 锤先生 @chunxiansheng 108 淳先生 @cixiansheng 108 辞先生 @couxiansheng 108 凑先生 @cunxiansheng 108 寸先生 @dangxiansheng 138 荡先生 @enxiansheng 138 恩先生 @gaixiansheng 138 盖先生 @gangxiansheng 138 钢先生 @ganxi

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @qiongq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,953 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“先生/小姐” (@qiongq), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qiongq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.