Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

单字+1/中文

@nzhuan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003333589514
TypeChannel
Username@nzhuan
Created21 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nzhuan

Growth

410 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:174no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:464first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2391.7%
avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held7 (21 April 202619 July 2026)
Views total287
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC112 viewsread 13 August 2026

导航分类,点击直接跳转 单字+1 - 中文 - 中文2 点击直接跳转

19 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC110 viewsread 13 August 2026

中文2 @daoyouzheng 188 导游证 @dierkuan 118 第二款 @diyixiang 168 第一项 @dtrxo 98 TRX系列 @fashetai 188 发射台 @fazhanju 188 发展局 @feizhengyi 168 非正义 @gongxihuanghou 288 恭喜皇后 @guipingxian 188 贵平县 @hanxinyun 188 喊幸运 @hanzhangfu 188 喊丈夫 @haojiwan 168 好几万 @hemeidian 188 和美店 @houjishi 188 候机室 @huanyuanxing 138 还原性 @huiliuchu 188 汇流处 @huoshanqu 288 火山区 @jihuawai 118 计划外 @jingongzhe 288 进攻者 @jinshugai 118 金属盖 @jinyugan 288 金鱼竿 @kong

19 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

中文 @ajiluo 98 阿基罗 @anligan 138 暗里干 @annei 198 按内 @baizhanglao 168 白长老 @bengniao 78 蹦鸟 @bengzui 78 蹦醉 @bianken 78 边啃 @bianpie 78 变撇 @buzhujin 168 补助金 @canpi 98 蟾皮 @caoguowei 178 曹国伟 @chuanglve 68 创略 @chuanjieqiu 128 传接球 @chuchengwang 128 楚成王 @chunlve 68 春略 @chuonen 68 戳嫩 @dabingtuan 168 大兵团 @dadi7 178 大帝7 @daibanfei 128 代办费 @daximen 98 大西门 @diernian 128 第二年 @dingcou 78 丁丑 @dingnou 68 鼎耨 @disanzhong 98 第三中 @disilei

1

21 Apr 2026, 07:30 UTC58 viewsread 13 August 2026

单字+1 @bliang 78 冰凉 @bshuan 68 不栓 @bzhui 68 冰锥 @chang234 138 长234 @chuai1 68 踹1 @chuai66 68 初爱66 @chuaid 68 踹d @chuaif 68 踹f @chuaih 68 踹h @chuaip 68 踹p @chuaiq 68 踹q @chuais 68 踹s @chuaiv 68 踹v @chuaiw 68 踹W @chuaiy 68 踹y @chuo234 138 戳234 @dshuo 68 大硕 @dui678 138 对678 @fzhuan 78 粉钻 @gqiong 68 更穷 @gshuan 68 更酸 @gzhuan 68 更赚 @gzuan 98 该赚 @hjiong 98 何炅 @huaiz 68 坏仔 @kao234 98 靠234 @kshuan 68 看书案 @kua001 168 夸001

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nzhuan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,997 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“单字+1/中文” (@nzhuan), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nzhuan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.