Channel
@qaytarilish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
208subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001901517986 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qaytarilish |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qaytarilish |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 208 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 208 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,965 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qaytarilish. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Maktabning vazifasi faqat ta'limmi? Maktab davrlarimni eslasam, o‘qituvchilar juda ko‘p bir gapni takrorlashardi: «Maktab ta’lim beradigan joy, tarbiyangiz uchun ota-onangiz javobgar. Ota-onangiz sizning tarbiyangiz uchun vaqt ajratishga majbur. Ota-onalar bitta o‘zining bolasiga eplab tarbiya berolmaydi, biz qanday qilib o‘ttizta bolaga tarbiya bera olamiz? Shu maktabni deb o‘zimning oilamga vaqt ajratolmayapman. U…
Eng katta mag‘lubiyat — bu qilgan xatodan xulosa chiqarmaslik. Umid qilamanki, siz bu xatolaringizni tushundingiz va keyingi imkoniyatingizdan unumli foydalanasiz. Hech qanday siqilishdan va yig‘i-sig‘idan naf yo‘q. Sentyabrni kutmasdan, harakatingizni boshlayvering. Ukam, singlim, hozir aynan o‘qiydigan vaqtingiz. Ilm sizni hech qachon kam qilmaydi. Xudo ham mehnatingizga yarashasini har doim beradi. Oldingizda bir…
Abituriyentlarga Abituriyentlarga anchadan beri aytaman deb yurgan gaplarim, maslahatlarim bor. Bugun shuni yozishga qaror qildim. Abituriyentlik davrim hayotimdagi eng murakkab davrlardan bo‘lgan. O‘zimni moddiy jihatdan ham, ruhiy jihatdan ham kuchsiz his qilganman. Sinfdoshlarim kunora kompyuterxonaga, aylanishga borgan paytlari menda bunga imkon bo‘lmagan. Hayotimni o‘zgartirish uchun hozir o‘qishim kerakligini…
– Sen do'zax borligiga ishonasanmi, Xustina? – Ha, men jannat borligiga ham ishonaman, Susanna. – Men faqat do'zax borligiga ishonaman.
Shundoq ham butun umring azob-uqubatda o'tadi, zora u dunyoda rohat-farog'at ko'rsam degan ilinj bilan yashaysan. Sen uchun jannatning eshigi yopilgach, bu yoqda boshqasi – jahannamning eshigi ochilar ekan, undan ko'ra dunyoga kelmay qo'ya qolganing yaxshi emasmi... ~ Xuan Rulfo ("Pedro Paramo")
Meni hayron qoldiradigan narsa qizlarning omiligi emas, shuncha diniy va dunyoviy ilmlarni o‘rganib, hali ham dunyoqarashi, fikrlashi tovuq katagidan ham kichikligi. Dunyoviy ilmlar haqida gapirmayman, u boshqa masala. Biroq diniy ilmlarni yaxshigina egallagan qizlar nahot shunchalik molparast va dunyoga shunchalik oshiq bo‘lsa? Qanchalik erish bo‘lmasin, anavi vayner aytganidek, bu dunyo mendan ham, sizdan ham qolis…
Ijtimoiy tarmoqlar haqida oxirgi paytlar juda ko'p o'ylayapman. Qanday qilib bu "o'rgimchak to'ri" tez fursatda juda ko'p insonlarni o'ziga jalb qila oldi? Aytmoqchi bo'lganim, internetga qaramlik faqat siz-u menda emas, juda ko'p insonlarda, hatto irodasi butun deb bilgan kishilarimizda ham kuzatilyapti. Oldin ham aytganimdek, har qanday fikrga qarshi argument keltirsa bo'ladi. Shunday ekan, agar hozir men ijtimoiy …
maktub Seni biror kun ko‘chada uchratib qolishni juda xohlardim. Shunda men hech so'z demay, ko‘chaning qoq o‘rtasida, olomon ko‘z o‘ngida seni mahkam quchoqlab, sendan bo'sa olardim. Sen tipirchilab chiqib ketmoqchi bo‘larding, men esa qo‘yib yubormasdim. Oxiri yulqinib chiqarding-da, jahl bilan haqoratlar yog‘dira boshlarding. Ehtimol tarsaki ham tortib yuborarsan. Ammo, shuni bilishingni xohlardimki, bu hech qa…
Q.zlar guruhinining qo'shig'ida "Mashinang 18 yoshingdan bo'lsin" degan joyi bor. Quloqqa bu xuddi feministik da'vat bo'lib eshitiladi. Go'yo qizlarni o'zi oyoqqa turishga targ'ibdek. Guruh qo'shiqlarini feministik manifesto deganlar ham bo'ldi. Ammo mutlaqo bunday emas. Bu bor-yo'g'i hashamat targ'iboti va u hozirgi iste'molchilik madaniyati bilan yo'g'rilgan pop-feminizmdan suv ichgan. Asl feminizm bu emas. 18 yo…
"Platforma"da yashayapmizmi? "Odamlar qoidalarga ishonmay qo'ysa, zo'ravonlikka ishonishni boshlaydi." Yaqin do'stim tavsiyasi bilan "Platforma"ni tomosha qildim. Filmdagi g'oyalar meni chuqur o'ylashga majbur qildi. Dunyoda sakkiz milliarddan ortiq inson turli xil tabaqalarga bo'linib yashaydi. Ularning ba'zilari o'ta boy, ba'zilari o'ta qashshoq, ayrimlari esa o'rtahol kun kechiradi. Ularning yashash sharoiti h…
Nafrat? Yaqinda bir oyga yaqin ijtimoiy tarmoqlarga kirmadim. Mana, bir hafta bo'libdiki, yana ijtimoiy tarmoqlardan foydalanib kelyapman. Ijtimoiy tarmoqlardan foydalanmagan paytim men nima topdim? Halovat, sokinlik, sifatli uyqu, reallikni his etish, odamlar bilan haqiqatan ham birga bo'lish... Bu ro'yxatni yana ancha davom ettirish mumkin. Ijtimoiy tarmoqqa kirishim bilan esa odamlarning bir-biriga bo'lgan ulka…
Sen sovuq qotganmisan issiq yozni kunidiyam?..
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qaytarilish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,903 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qaytarilish” (@qaytarilish), 208 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qaytarilish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.