19 Jul 2026, 04:13 UTC84 viewsread 13 August 2026
导航分类，点击直接跳转 TRX - svip - svip1 点击直接跳转
Channel
TRX/SVIP
@pzhuang
5 usernames
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003745524131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @atrxw @btrxr @btrxw @ctrxq @pzhuang |
| Created | 21 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pzhuang |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1960.0%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 78.4
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (21 April 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 392 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
19 Jul 2026, 04:13 UTC84 viewsread 13 August 2026
1
19 Jul 2026, 04:13 UTC83 viewsread 13 August 2026
svip1 @angsvip 168 @chesvip 168 @duisvip 168 @kuasvip 168 @kuosvip 168 @liesvip 188 烈svip @neisvip 168 @niesvip 188 聂svip @nongsvip 168 @nuosvip 168 @paisvip 188 排svip @pengsvip 188 鹏svip @piansvip 188 偏svip @quesvip 168 @rengsvip 168 @ruisvip 188 瑞svip @ruosvip 188 若svip @shuangsvip 188 双svip @shuansvip 168 @tousvip 188 投svip @tuisvip 168 @tunsvip 168 @zhaisvip 168 @zousvip 168 🛫🛫🛫🛫 回到导航 🛫🛫🛫🛫
19 Jul 2026, 04:13 UTC84 viewsread 13 August 2026
1
19 Jul 2026, 04:13 UTC57 viewsread 13 August 2026
svip @bangsvip 168 @bengsvip 168 @biesvip 168 @cangsvip 188 苍svip @cansvip 188 灿svip @cengsvip 188 曾svip @censvip 168 @chaisvip 188 柴svip @changsvip 188 常svip @chansvip 188 蝉svip @chengsvip 188 程svip @chisvip 188 赤svip @chousvip 168 @chuaisvip 168 @chuangsvip 168 @chuisvip 188 锤svip @chuosvip 168 @congsvip 188 聪svip @cuansvip 168 @cuisvip 188 崔svip @cunsvip 168 @cuosvip 168 @dangsvip 168 @diaosvip 188 迪奥svip @dies…
19 Jul 2026, 03:28 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «TRX/SVIP»
21 Apr 2026, 07:32 UTC47 viewsread 13 August 2026
TRX @atrxw 98 @btrxa 98 @btrxl 98 @btrxr 98 @btrxw 98 @btrxz 98 @ctrxj 98 @ctrxq 98 @dtrxa 98 @dtrxf 98 @dtrxi 98 @dtrxl 98 @dtrxp 98 @dtrxu 98 @dtrxv 98 @dtrxx 138 @dtrxz 98 @etrxb 98 @etrxd 98 @etrxf 98 @etrxg 98 @etrxj 98 @etrxk 98 @etrxm 98 @etrxr 98 @etrxs 98 @ftrxc 98 @ftrxd 98 @ftrxe 98 @ftrxg 98 @ftrxj 98 @ftrxo 98 @ftrxu 98 @ftrxx 138 @htrxa 98 @htrxl 98 @htrxo 98 @htrxr 98 @htrxs 98 @htrxt 98 @htrxw …
21 Apr 2026, 07:32 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @pzhuang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,953 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
cc4j4
@cc4j4 · 31 postchixuanxuan
@chixuanxuan · 31 postddh0d
@ddh0d · 31 postdds7d
@dds7d · 31 postddwqd
@ddwqd · 41 postffh0f
@ffh0f · 41 postggw6g
@ggw6g · 31 postjudingding
@judingding · 31 postnichunchun
@nichunchun · 41 postnn7q7
@nn7q7 · 41 postoo8z8
@oo8z8 · 31 postpp4vp
@pp4vp · 31 postpp5a5
@pp5a5 · 31 postrrpcr
@rrpcr · 31 posttaiganggang
@taiganggang · 31 posttangbaofu
@tangbaofu · 31 postttw9t
@ttw9t · 31 postvv4r4
@vv4r4 · 51 postweisuosuo
@weisuosuo · 51 postwoqiuqiu
@woqiuqiu · 31 postww5z5
@ww5z5 · 41 postyygmy
@yygmy · 31 postzeyiyi
@zeyiyi · 31 postzz4d4
@zz4d4 · 21 post
@cc4j4 · 31 postchixuanxuan
@chixuanxuan · 31 postddh0d
@ddh0d · 31 postdds7d
@dds7d · 31 postddwqd
@ddwqd · 41 postffh0f
@ffh0f · 41 postggw6g
@ggw6g · 31 postjudingding
@judingding · 31 postnichunchun
@nichunchun · 41 postnn7q7
@nn7q7 · 41 postoo8z8
@oo8z8 · 31 postpp4vp
@pp4vp · 31 postpp5a5
@pp5a5 · 31 postrrpcr
@rrpcr · 31 posttaiganggang
@taiganggang · 31 posttangbaofu
@tangbaofu · 31 postttw9t
@ttw9t · 31 postvv4r4
@vv4r4 · 51 postweisuosuo
@weisuosuo · 51 postwoqiuqiu
@woqiuqiu · 31 postww5z5
@ww5z5 · 41 postyygmy
@yygmy · 31 postzeyiyi
@zeyiyi · 31 postzz4d4
@zz4d4 · 21 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TRX/SVIP” (@pzhuang), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pzhuang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.