Channel
@pythonboost
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,676subscribers
-215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001319064967 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pythonboost |
| Description | Лучший Python телеграм канал для новичков. Цель: подготовка студентов, начинающих питонистов к нахождению первой работы. @anothertechrock РКН: https://kurl.ru/Jhcwp |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pythonboost |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 16:18 | 10,676 | -3 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 10,679 | -1 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:58 | 10,680 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:07 | 10,681 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:57 | 10,682 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:57 | 10,685 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:36 | 10,688 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 10,690 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:36 | 10,697 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:39 | 10,700 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 10,704 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 10,705 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:47 | 10,708 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 10,712 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 10,716 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 10,721 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 10,724 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 10,725 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 10,726 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 10,729 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
43 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 32.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqvo3AL3 | 1 | 25 August 2026 | 25 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 25 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Статья дня. Функция any() в Python Часто в программах на Python требуется проверить, является ли хотя бы один элемент структуры данных истинным. Да, можно написать цикл для перебора итерируемого объекта и проверки того, является ли каждый элемент истинным или ложным. Но функция any() – более эффективный и питонический способ достижения того же результата. Читать статью #читать
👍2👏1
🔍Тестовое собеседование на Middle Python с разработчиком из Яндекса завтра вечером Уже завтра вечером в 19:00 по мск приходи онлайн на открытое собеседование, чтобы посмотреть на настоящее интервью на Middle Python-разработчика. Как это будет: 📂 Хачатур, старший разработчик в Яндексе, будет задавать реальные вопросы и задачи разработчику-добровольцу 📂 Хачатур будет комментировать каждый ответ респондента, чтобы дат…
❤2👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Как найти все четные числа в списке за одну строку кода? evens = [x for x in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] if x % 2 == 0] print(evens) # [2, 4, 6] Какой ваш вариант решения?
Видео дня. Решаем задачи на Python с Codewars Продолжаем покорять Codewars. Решаем популярные задачи 5 ранга. Ссылка на YouTube #видео
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
Каким будет вывод в консоли?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Каким будет вывод этого кода в консоли?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Каким будет вывод этого кода?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pythonboost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 3 posts on @pythonboost as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Каким будет вывод в консоли?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каким будет вывод этого кода в консоли?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каким будет вывод этого кода?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каким будет вывод этого кода в консоли?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каким будет вывод в консоли?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каким будет вывод этого кода?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PythonBoost - сообщество питонистов” (@pythonboost), 10,676 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pythonboost.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.