Channel
@python_practics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,184subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001987659843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @python_practics |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/python_practics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 5,184 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 5,187 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 5,194 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 5,196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 5,196 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (13 October 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 293 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 55.9% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 33.9% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwyEytb | 1 | 10 November 2025 | 10 November 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
АЙТИШНИКИ БЕСПЛАТНОЕ ОБУЧЕНИЕ Проект «TERMINAL» стал крупнейшей библиотекой бесплатного образования. В одном канале собраны курсы, книги, полезные инструменты и практические тренажёры для всех разработчиков: • Практические курсы и задания • Книги и статьи известных авторов • Полезные инструменты и ресурсы • IT-новости и инсайды Обучение по всем направлениям: SQL, Python, ML, Frontend, PHP, C++, Go, Git, Linux, QA,…
❤1
В чем польза модуля pickle для работы с данными в Python?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Польза модуля pickle В чем польза модуля pickle для работы с данными в Python? Посмотреть ответ. @python_practics
👍2
Pendulum Если стандартный модуль datetime кажется громоздким и неудобным, библиотека Pendulum предлагает более элегантное и мощное решение. Она упрощает работу с датами, временем и часовыми поясами, делая код чище и понятнее. Основные преимущества Pendulum: 1. Интуитивный синтаксис. Создание, парсинг и форматирование дат выполняются просто и логично — без лишнего кода и сложных конструкций. 2. Удобная работа с часо…
❤1
Айти “умирает”, вакансий нет, все говорят про кризис? В канале “Frontend менторинг | Косилов” разбираю, что реально происходит на рынке и как всё-таки находить офферы. Там: честные зарплатные вилки, разборы резюме и портфолио, стратегии поиска работы и роста в кризис, без инфоцыганства и розовых обещаний. Я действующий фронтенд-разработчик и ментор, показываю, как адаптироваться к рынку, а не ждать “когда всё налад…
Восстание машин уже близко. Скоро тоже будут искать вторую работу и жаловаться на вайб-кодеров. @python_practics | #мемчики
❤8🔥2👍1
Быстрая проверка наличия подстроки в Python 👍 - если было полезно @python_practics | #полезные_сниппеты
👍3
Динамическая типизация с typing.Protocol в Python typing.Protocol из модуля typing позволяет задавать интерфейсы для классов без явного наследования, обеспечивая поддержку структурной типизации. Это особенно полезно для проверки совместимости объектов на основе их методов, а не явного наследования, что делает код более гибким. from typing import Protocol class Flyable(Protocol): def fly(self) -> None: …
👍5❤2
👨👨👨👨👨👨👨👨👨👨 Каналы с Junior IT вакансиями и стажировками Подписывайся и забирай свой оффер 🤘 1. Стажировки и вакансии по России и миру 2. IT вакансии по СНГ 3. IT стажировки по СНГ 4. ИИ-ассистент для автооткликов 5. IT стажировки и волонтерства 6. IT стажировки в топовых компаниях мира 7. Удалённые IT вакансии и стажировки 8. Python вакансии и стажировки 9. БИГТЕХ вакансии и стажировки 10. Design вакансии и стажир…
Какой из вариантов кода правильно отфильтрует список words, чтобы остались только слова длиной больше 3-х символов?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎4👍3
Фильтрация списков Какой из вариантов кода правильно отфильтрует список: words = ['python', 'cat', 'java', 'dog', 'go'], чтобы оставить только слова длиной больше 3 символов? Посмотреть ответ. @python_practics
🔍Тестовое собеседование на Middle Python с Senior из X5 уже завтра! Уже завтра(11 ноября) в 19:00 по мск приходи онлайн на открытое собеседование, чтобы посмотреть на настоящее интервью на Middle Python-разработчика. Как это будет: 📂 Олег, старший разработчик в X5, будет задавать реальные вопросы и задачи разработчику-добровольцу 📂 Олег будет комментировать каждый ответ респондента, чтобы дать понять чего от вас ож…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @python_practics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В чем польза модуля pickle для работы с данными в Python?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой из вариантов кода правильно отфильтрует список words, чтобы остались только слова длиной больше 3-х символов?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“python_practics” (@python_practics), 5,184 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/python_practics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.