Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Большой Пудовкин

@pudovkin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

456subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564196569
TypeChannel
Username@pudovkin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pudovkin

Growth

4567 Aug 2026, 04:48 — 456 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:40 — 456 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:487 Aug 2026, 06:40
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 455–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:40456no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:48456first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.1%
avg views ÷ 456 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held17 (5 December 202518 July 2026)
Views total302
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15648.3%
🔥5918.3%
👍3310.2%
😁329.91%
👏113.41%
🤔92.79%
💔61.86%
🎉51.55%
🥰51.55%
🤩41.24%
👀10.31%
😢10.31%
🙏10.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC178 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На съезде советских документалистов в 1935 году широко обсуждался метод "восстановления факта". Допустимо ли снимать реконструкции сюжетов из жизни, в том числе нанимать актеров? Однозначно нехорошо. Но что если оператор по каким-то причинам не сумел заснять политически важное событие? Вопрос сложный, и какие-то "восстановления" допускались, если в целом сюжет получался политически правильным: "материал должен правди

😁10🤩43

16 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC124 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZoopraxiscopePhoto

Энтузиазм советских людей заряжает город, который сам будто бы пускается в пляс от радости. К танцу присоединяются ложки и бутылки, клавиши рояля и ботинки. Всюду загораются улыбки. Эта страна настоящая, или только сон? Нет, это фильм, который увидели зрители в кинотеатре. С экрана сходит волшебник, кинооператор Михаил Кауфман, а следом за ним — киноаппарат модели «Парво». Ему больше не нужен оператор, он теперь сам

🔥41

10 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC215 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А еще почитайте свежую заметку, которую я сделал для сайта Daydreams. Early Cinema Database — о малоизвестном эпизоде встречи Елизаветы Свиловой и Всеволода Мейерхольда.

🔥114👏4

10 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC205 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто в Москве — завтра приходите в Третьяковку на презентацию книги «Немое кино: Магия кинематографа в буквах и картинках», которую мы в этом году выпустили вместе с издательством Альпина.Дети. Вместе с чудесной художницей Анной Журко и киноархивисткой 80 уровня Александрой Устюжаниной — очень люблю ее телеграм-канал, подписывайтесь! — будем говорить и о самой книге, и шире: о Великом Немом. А завершит встречу показ

11

26 Apr 2026, 15:27 UTC549 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В газете Пионерская правда за 1931 год, в рубрике "что там на Западе", детей саркастично оповещают, что в Германии запретили к показу документальный фильм о Процессе Промпартии. Не знаю, зачем это знать школьникам, но случай цензуры видимо действительно вопиющий. Любопытно, что образ здоровых и больных глаз здесь очень дзигавертовский, — кино воздействует на сознание через зрение, и враги закрывают массам глаза от "п

😁7👍3🔥2

25 Apr 2026, 13:06 UTC319 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Несчастные пионеры, возвращаясь домой из школы, хотят делать уроки. Но отец не дает, гонит за папиросами, да еще и на гармошке весь вечер играет. Жаль, что такие сюжеты в детский киножурнал "Пионерия" так и не вошли, хотя его авторы и призывали операторов приносить им больше бытового материала — о настоящий проблемах маленьких советских граждан. К тому времени основное место в киножурнале стали занимать бесчисленны

💔4👍2

24 Apr 2026, 15:09 UTC329 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хроники советской централизации киноиндустрии. В 1932 году руководитель новообразованной Союзкинохроники Виктор Иосилевич рассказывает о достижениях центральной московской кинофабрики. Впервые вижу официальный отчет киностудии, где упоминается, сколько яиц и сельдей выделено каждому работнику (довольно мало, учитывая, что это за три месяца?). Но самое удивительное, что на студии был свой крольчатник на 35 голов. Оче

🤔6💔2

8 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC491 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Представил альтернативную реальность, где Микки Маус строит ясли для советских детей, чтобы мамы-работницы могли спокойно идти на службу. Мышонок в белом халате кормит детишек, занимается с ними физкультурой, разыгрывает кукольные представления. А вечером с благостной улыбкой раздает малышей обратно их родителям. О какой дискредитации может идти речь? Из статьи пионера советской анимации Николая Ходатаева в "Пролета

😁7🙏1

11 Mar 2026, 15:53 UTC560 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Окунувшись в работу редакторов-монтажеров 1920-х, обнаружил любопытного персонажа с обочины истории советского кино. Перед тем как встать у монтажного стола на фабрике Госкино, Семен Богатырев три года служил в Красной армии, а затем еще три года — в органах ЧК. Внезапно ушел в кино в 1924 году. Таких неожиданных карьерных кульбитов было, кажется, немало в то время. Из чекистов в известные кинооператоры, например, т

🔥148

9 Mar 2026, 15:04 UTC420 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В Центре "Зотов" недавно открылась замечательная выставка — к 130-летию Дзиги Вертова, которую рекомендую посетить всем интересующимся. Если вы когда-нибудь хотели стать киноком, то наконец это стало возможным, благодаря команде музея и чудесным кураторам Полине Стрельцовой, Полине Прибытковой и Константину Дудакову-Кошуро. Я принимал весомое участие в ее создании в качестве научного консультанта, в частности, подбр

🔥144👏2

7 Mar 2026, 15:44 UTC998 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уже в продаже моя новая книжка — про немое кино для самых маленьких. Спасибо издательству "Альпина. Дети" за такой интересный опыт: после въедливых исторических книг о Дзиге Вертове и 1920-х писать ее было необычно, нужно было постоянно себя перенастраивать. Рассказать увлекательно и доступно про Штрогейма и Шёстрема было не самой простой задачей! Но все удалось, и не самые, мягко говоря, детские фильмы получили ярк

23👍8🥰5🔥4👀1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pudovkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 762,077 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Большой Пудовкин” (@pudovkin), 456 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pudovkin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.