Channel
@Zoopraxiscope
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,370subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001280773993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zoopraxiscope |
| Created | 3 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zoopraxiscope |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,370 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 1,369 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 1,365 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 1,364 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,364 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (24 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,548 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Американку Луизу Брукс сделало звездой европейское кино. «Ящик Пандоры» и «Дневник падшей» вышли в 1929 году — и тонкая девушка с каре стала воплощением идеала с червоточинкой, «ревущих двадцатых», уходящих навсегда. А что было прямо до? В ближайшую субботу, 7 августа, во дворике Музея русского зарубежья в рамках летнего фестиваля «Русский след в мировом кинематографе» смотрим фильм, благодаря которому на Брукс обр…
Как функционировало русское кинопроизводство в 1920-е? Как тратились и как зарабатывались на кино деньги? Кем и сколько? Чем «Совкино» отличалось от «Межрабпом-Руси», и оба они – от «Пролеткино»? В ближайшее воскресенье, 9 августа, наконец-то узнаем об этом у историка, доктора экономических наук Александра Бессолицына. В диалоге с ним в кинозале Третьяковки три историка кино — Станислав Дединский, Наталья Рябчикова …
«Я стремился быть художником в том виде искусства, где это не позволялось» — писал в воспоминаниях австрийско-американский кинорежиссер Джозеф фон Штернберг. Возможно, поэтому историки кино включают его «Последний приказ» (1928) в число лучших, по-настоящему авторских и самых совершенных произведений эпохи немого кино. Фильм о русской революции и голливудском кино не показывали советскому зрителю, тем более приятно…
Как (русские) актеры находили работу в Голливуде? В том числе вот так! The Standard Casting Directory: 1927, 1928, 1930, 1931 годы. Николая Сусанина, а также Михаила Визарова (и Уильяма Пауэлла, и Эмиля Яннингса) увидим в ближайшую субботу в фильме о русских эмигрантах в Голливуде — «Последний приказ» (1928) Джозефа фон Штернберга. Фильм представит историк кино Наталья Рябчикова. 🎬1 августа, 19:00 🎥Нижняя Радищевс…
⬆️Что было в субботу в «Пиотровском»
Video message, posted without a caption
Серия четвертая. Звезды Голливуда и их дети Журнал Photoplay за 1933 год сообщает: Сказки, которые рассказывают перед сном Николасу Сусанину-младшему, — это красочные истории о старой доброй России, которую знали его родители. Мама Ольга Бакланова до начала работы в кино играла в Московском художественном театре. Николаса Сусанина-старшего, то есть Николая Ильича Сусанина, в рамках летнего фестиваля «Русский след в…
Серия третья. Звезда и ее дитя. СЧАСТЛИВАЯ МАТЬ Киноактрисы, скрывающие свое материнство, опасаясь потерять поклонников, не вызывают никакого сочувствия у Ольги Баклановой, поющей русской звезды, которая теперь посвящает себя исключительно американским фильмам. На фотографии выше Бакланова, которая в личной жизни является женой Николая Сусанина, также киноактера, с гордостью демонстрирует Ника-младшего, весом девят…
Серия вторая. Светская жизнь. Недавние москвичи Сусанин и Бакланова становятся частью голливудского мира звезд, который не меньше чем наполовину состоит из недавних иммигрантов. УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ ВЕЧЕРОМ! Вы приглашены на грандиозную кинопремьеру — потрясающий, удивительный, захватывающий первый показ нового фильма. Вы увидите звезд, больше, чем на небе! Вы увидите, как они подъезжают к дверям кинотеатра на своих автомоб…
Что почитать об Эйзенштейне? К завтрашнему разговору в книжном магазине «Пиотровский» — недавний «хит-парад» биографий мастера от нашего научного редактора (и эйзенштейноведа) Натальи Рябчиковой. 📔Зарегистрироваться здесь
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Zoopraxiscope. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 27,389 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Киноартель 1895” (@Zoopraxiscope), 1,370 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zoopraxiscope.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.