Channel
@psytechnology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
236subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001103248886 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psytechnology |
| Created | 19 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psytechnology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 236 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 237 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 237 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 217 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
142 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 46.5% | |
| 🔥 | 58 | 40.8% | |
| custom 5280853828793569324 | 8 | 5.63% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 4.93% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.11% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Возвращаюсь поездом с 2-х дневной стратегической сессии. Группа компаний, ярдовые обороты, переходят в корпоративное управление, но до сих пор, некоторым директоратом интерпретируются как находящиеся в этапе Гоу-Гоу по Адизесу. Ну конечно же нет - имя им - “старая аристократия” по Адизесу! По моему. И тут же оценка модели жизненного цикла организаций по Адизесу - её каждый может интерпретировать по своему! А неадект…
👍7🔥2
В Программе по архетипам мы используем октаэдр с 4-мя плоскостями, в понимании, что каждая пирамида это Анима/Анимус нашего Существа... Это авторский фреймворк 🤩 Школы ПСИТЕХПРО, который позволяет увидеть своё Колесо Баланса засинхроненное со своим партнёром, а также использовать наличествующие и подверженные динамикой в психике стихии на нужную событийную ветку... Так участники Программы исследуя свои силы, инстру…
custom 52808538287935693245
Через месяц - 28-30 августа - Подъём по Полковничьим водопадам - к Верхним Центрам Это анонс выездного исследовательского мероприятия, которое состоится в рамках Школы развития ПСИТЕХПРО Физический трек, горный воздух, мох, папоротники, природные водоёмы, скалы, горные луга, да и локация хорошо описаны тут. Это будет круговой маршрут - восхождение через 13 водопадов (18-ти метровый самый высокий из них), а спуск по…
❤7
Posted without readable text
❤8🔥3
🤩 ПЛАН НОВОЙ ПРОГРАММЫ 19.07.-1.11. Архетипы в человеке главенствующе проявляются на разных уровнях (в деятельности, отношениях, ценностно) и представлены разными формами (именно поэтому образ имеет всегда больше власть над человеком, чем слово, текст). Пусть даже это образ внутренний и неосознан. Выше архетипов только смыслы, и способность создавать и читать их раскрывается степенью интегрированности частных архети…
🔥7❤3
Вчера со студентами mini-МВА свалились в трендовое - в значимость интеграции своего архетипа. Ну это про то, как стать веcомее, точнее и 😎 прибыльнее! Если вы разрабатываете продукт, ведёте консультации или коучите — но клиенты всё ещё путают вас с десятком похожих предложений, то проблема не в конкуренции — проблема в отличительной узнаваемости (сигнатуре). Когда вы не интегрированы как личность и как бренд, ваша к…
🔥8❤4
Кстати про «тараны» Коучинг в Россию пришел очередным методом культурного сотрудничества через «западных партнеров» ICF. Казалось бы, обыкновенная бизнесовая экспансия заготовка инициатором головы инициируемого, для известного инициатору тарана. В нужное время в нужном месте. И вот это время и место настало: Россия, 24.02.2022, — когда международная коучинговая федерация ICF не просто встала и вышла из РФ, но такж…
🔥8custom 52808538287935693243
Очень непростое место Алтай — выпадающее из традиционного эгрегора РПЦ, оно сохранило Традицию живого Язычества, через шаман-изм. И первое со вторым ничего поделать не может. Место, в котором всеми одинаково ощущается Свобода и Порядок Природы, а не вот это вот всё ваше) Да даже Греф со своим пришлым туристическим вписыванием сработает на возвращение к Традициям природным: открытым Хаосом сменится привычный порядо…
🔥9
Вчера состоялся анонс новой программы в Школе ПСИТЕХПРО https://t.me/psy_tech_pro/58 Будет еще пару постов приглашающих к работе с архетипами, указывающими на проблематику и значимость работы. Но если давно искали, то сразу стучитесь @alekseimarchenko Будем решать сразу несколько задач: 1) Создавать основания, чтобы мальчики становились мужчинами 2) чтобы девочки лучше чувствовали внутренние опоры и безошибочно вы…
❤7
С Праздником!
❤13⚡3🔥2
И при чем тут 🤩ПСИТЕХПРО?)
Ну что, друзья! 4 июня в ИНТЦ МГУ прошла наша первая деловая игра «Калейдоскоп-ТРИЗ». За два часа участники успели сделать то, на что в рабочих буднях иногда уходят недели: разобрать около 10 реальных кейсов и выработать более 50 вариантов решений. Каждый участник пришел со своим запросом — профессиональным, бизнесовым или даже личным. В результате в работу попали самые разные кейсы: от разработки новых продуктов …
🔥9❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @psytechnology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 365,441 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Развитие с ПСИТЕХПРО” (@psytechnology), 236 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psytechnology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.