Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КОМПЛАЕНС | ПСИХОТЕРАПИЯ

Channel

КОМПЛАЕНС | ПСИХОТЕРАПИЯ

@psycompliance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

389subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002280932396
TypeChannel
Username@psycompliance
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psycompliance

Growth

384389386.57 August 2026 — 384 subscribers7 August 2026 — 385 subscribers14 August 2026 — 389 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 383–390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:37389+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:22385+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:01384first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.1%
avg views ÷ 389 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,327
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3731.9%
😁1412.1%
custom 54313980374506641861210.3%
custom 5433647754205211190119.48%
👍76.03%
🔥76.03%
custom 538009922294515215165.17%
custom 543141054869039700565.17%
custom 543369411408220256865.17%
custom 543359956037718081943.45%
custom 543401508128319987243.45%
custom 537972467173216821621.72%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы уже ждём тебя, залетай: ZOOM: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84637798436?pwd=bROoxlXcbIBD4mWJVyS64uEmR8u3aZ.1 VK: https://vkvideo.ru/live-236746295_456239064

1custom 54314105486903970051custom 54336477542052111901

6 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👀 Через час начинаем. Подготовьте свои вопросы — после короткой вводной части будем отвечать на них. Встречаемся в 19:00 в VK и Zoom. Ссылки на подключение пришлём незадолго до начала стрима

2custom 54314105486903970051

5 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC77 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра — второй стрим цикла о тревоге о здоровье. Почему после очередного обследования или поиска симптомов становится легче… но совсем ненадолго? Почему желание «проверить ещё раз» кажется таким логичным, хотя именно оно часто поддерживает тревогу? Об этом и поговорим завтра. 🕖 6 августа в 19:00 по МСК 📍 VK + Zoom Если ещё не подписались на напоминания — самое время это сделать. Перед эфиром мы пришлём ссылк

2custom 54313980374506641861custom 54335995603771808191custom 54336477542052111901

5 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC126 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«А что если…? А вдруг…?» Нам так легко попасть в прогнозирование всевозможных негативных сценариев будущего. Но почему такое происходит? Зачастую за этим стоит попытка нашего мозга уберечь нас, подготовить к наихудшему развитию событий. Только вот будущее неопределено, поэтому вариаций сценариев, требующих подготовки, очень много. Мысленное прокручивание этих сценариев провоцирует тревогу, напряжение и застревание

9custom 54313980374506641861custom 54336477542052111901custom 54340150812831998721

3 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC102 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

4😁2custom 54335995603771808191custom 54336477542052111901

30 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC261 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Я же просто хочу убедиться, что всё в порядке…» Именно так чаще всего начинается тревожный цикл. Проверить симптом, поискать информацию, ещё раз сходить к врачу, переспросить близких. На какое-то время становится легче. А потом тревога возвращается. На следующем стриме поговорим о том, почему так происходит и как отличить разумную заботу о здоровье от проверок, которые только поддерживают тревогу. 📅 6 августа 🕖 1

3🔥3custom 54313980374506641861custom 54336477542052111901

29 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC164 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне хочется есть или мне тревожно? 😨 Не всегда легко ответить на этот вопрос. Но есть рабочий способ — взять паузу и прислушаться к себе. Наша задача — отличить физический голод от эмоционального (того самого желания "заесть" чувства). Это не стопроцентное разделение, но хороший навык, который нарабатывается со временем. На что обратить внимание: 😵‍💫 Физический голод нарастает постепенно. Эмоциональный приходит р

7😁3custom 54335995603771808192🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC126 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9custom 54336941140822025682

24 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC192 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ОКР и ритуалы: почему одна проверка влечёт за собой другую? Вы когда-нибудь замечали: перепроверили дверь — отошли — и снова сомневаетесь 🤔 Перечитали сообщение — закрыли — открыли ещё раз, чтобы убедиться 🤔 Кажется, что лишняя проверка добавит спокойствия. Но на деле она закрепляется в опыте как ключевой навык совладания с тревогой. Как это работает? 👌 Вы закрыли дверь. 😕 Секунду! Вы точно уверены, что вы её зак

👍4🔥3custom 53797246717321682162custom 54314105486903970051custom 54336477542052111901

17 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC180 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тревожная депрессия и меланхолическая депрессия: почему депрессия бывает разной? Когда мы слышим слово «депрессия», многие представляют человека, который лежит в постели без сил и никуда не выходит. Но на самом деле депрессия может выглядеть очень по-разному. Например, существуют тревожная и меланхолическая депрессия. 😔 Тревожная депрессия • Постоянное внутреннее напряжение. • Бесконечные тревожные мысли о буду

5custom 53800992229451521512custom 54336477542052111902custom 54336941140822025682

8 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC217 viewsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо всем, кто был с нами! 🥰 Для тех, у кого не получилось присутствовать, завтра пришлём ссылку на запись 💻, а сейчас просим пройти форму обратной связи, чтобы наши стримы оставались для вас такими же интересными: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe054x43vMSutSBB8vsxLWhfOUZmWB3DwRpvF5tTryfTdqNLg/viewform?usp=dialog

8 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC359 viewsread 7 August 2026

Присоединяйтесь! Мы уже начинаем 💻 Ссылки: VK: https://vkvideo.ru/video-236746295_456239063?t=16m33s ZOOM: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81653641567?pwd=LJqiDIf26K5l1I2YPbbGDwbzx7MwdP.1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psycompliance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 219,513 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КОМПЛАЕНС | ПСИХОТЕРАПИЯ” (@psycompliance), 389 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psycompliance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.