Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психолог Людмила Митрофанова

Channel

Психолог Людмила Митрофанова

@psychology_coaching_numerology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

521subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002048541485
TypeChannel
Username@psychology_coaching_numerology
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychology_coaching_numerology

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5215355287 August 2026 — 535 subscribers8 August 2026 — 535 subscribers8 August 2026 — 533 subscribers14 August 2026 — 528 subscribers21 August 2026 — 527 subscribers29 August 2026 — 525 subscribers4 September 2026 — 526 subscribers13 September 2026 — 521 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 37 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 519–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 13:18521-5
4 Sept 2026, 17:38526+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:35525-2
21 Aug 2026, 16:17527-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:05528-5
8 Aug 2026, 06:03533-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:49535no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:06535first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

939 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤30232.2%
🔥27529.3%
👍24225.8%
👏373.94%
😁192.02%
🤣192.02%
💯131.38%
🥰131.38%
🤩60.639%
🤔40.426%
👌30.319%
😍30.319%
🙈20.213%
👻10.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 939 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psychology_coaching_numerology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 16 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Apr 2026, 12:33 UTC114 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие мои! Из-за ограничений в ТГ стало сложнее делиться контентом и оставаться на связи. Чтобы ничего не пропустить, приглашаю вас на мой канал в МАХ! Буду счастлива видеть вас среди подписчиков! Спасибо, что вы со мной ❤️

🔥5❤4👌3🥰3👏1

8 Mar 2026, 08:51 UTC168 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Девочки, девушки, женщины с 8 Марта! Желаю крепкого здоровья, душевного тепла, благополучия и неиссякаемого вдохновения! Пусть каждый ваш день будет наполнен радостью и улыбками! Будьте счастливы, любимы и успешны! 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿

❤12👍6🥰5😍3

25 Feb 2026, 10:36 UTC149 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Метод концентративного расслабления В моменты, когда вы испытываете напряжение, стресс или тревогу, может помочь метод концентративного расслабления. Это несложная в освоении, но эффективная техника, направленная на достижение глубокого расслабления через концентрацию на определённых образах, звуках или телесных ощущениях. 🌱 Найдите тихое место, уберите всё, что может вас отвлечь и примите удобную позу. 🌱 Обратите…

❤11👍9🔥8

23 Feb 2026, 11:11 UTC104 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всех мужчин поздравляю с 23 Февраля! Здоровья вам, сил, энергии, радости и счастья ♥️

❤12

20 Feb 2026, 07:41 UTC124 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁7🔥6💯3🙈2👍1

18 Feb 2026, 11:18 UTC127 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему ваши планы терпят крах? Вы когда‑нибудь сталкивались с такой ситуацией? Вы чётко формулируете цель, продумываете пошаговый план, а внутри остаётся странное, непонятное сопротивление. Как будто между вами и желаемым стоит невидимая стена. Все дело во внутреннем разрешении. Самая важная часть пути к цели — не стратегия и не дисциплина, а внутреннее разрешение себе достичь желаемого. Это глубокое, на уровне чув…

❤20🔥18👍16

16 Feb 2026, 07:55 UTC127 views59 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Кто, если не я? Сколько людей живут в режиме «вечного помощника»: думают за других, напоминают, подстраховывают, выслушивают, даже когда нет сил. Они оправдываются: «Мне не сложно», «Кто, если не я?», «Я просто такой человек». Со стороны это воспринимается как проявление заботы, но внутри человека копится усталость, раздражение и чувство, что тебя используют, к которым примешивается стыд за собственные негативные …

❤20👍20🔥14💯5

13 Feb 2026, 10:33 UTC124 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥13😁7💯5

11 Feb 2026, 15:09 UTC139 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✨ Благодарю всех, кто был сегодня с нами на эфире! Если вы пропустили эфир «Как стресс влияет на лишний вес: взгляд психолога и нутрициолога» или хотите ещё раз пересмотреть — я подготовила для вас запись. Это был особенный эфир: мы провели его совместно с нутрициологом, чтобы рассмотреть проблему с 2 сторон: психологии и нутрициологии. Что мы обсудили: ✅ стресс и его механизмы; ✅ почему именно на сладкое и фастфу…

❤10👍6🔥5

11 Feb 2026, 10:45 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026

НАЧИНАЕМ ЭФИР ЧЕРЕЗ 15 МИНУТ Подключиться к конференции Zoom https://us05web.zoom.us/j/81055419556?pwd=8vNVka8OHqb17qZw2c7bS20ASDjbli.1

10 Feb 2026, 09:07 UTC145 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я не хотела есть — просто было грустно 🔜 Вы когда-нибудь замечали, что после тяжёлого дня открываете холодильник и достаёте всё, что не планировали? 🔜 Вас тянет на сладкое, когда чувствуете тревогу или раздражение? 🔜 В моменты скуки вы автоматически берёте, например, чипсы, даже если не голодны? ‼Вы не одиноки. Это называется эмоциональным перееданием — и оно случается не потому, что у нас нет силы воли, а потому ч…

🔥11❤9👍8

8 Feb 2026, 09:29 UTC153 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие мои! Приглашаю вас на эфир, который я проведу совместно с нутрициологом Леной Назарцевой на тему: «Как стресс влияет на лишний вес: взгляд психолога и нутрициолога» На эфире мы разберем: 🌿 Что такое стресс 🌿 Почему в состоянии напряжения так тянет к сладкому и перекусам 🌿 Что происходит с пищеварением и обменом веществ при хроническом стрессе. 🌿 Какие наши действия только ухудшают ситуацию. 🌿Простые шаги, к…

❤29🔥22👍21🤩6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychology_coaching_numerology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Feb 2026, 09:08 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

Одни в стрессе худеют, другие набирают вес. А вы к какой категории относитесь? Поделитесь, как меняется ваше отношение к еде, когда нервы на пределе.

  1. Вообще перестаю есть.19%
  2. Ем намного больше обычного и не могу остановиться19%
  3. Ничего не меняется — ем, как всегда.21%
  4. Тянет на вкусняшки (сладости, фастфуд)47%
  5. Выбираю только лёгкую/здоровую пищу7%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 16 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Людмила Митрофанова” (@psychology_coaching_numerology), 521 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychology_coaching_numerology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.