Channel
@protasev_psy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,783subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002139002004 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @protasev_psy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/protasev_psy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,783 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:29 | 1,784 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 1,785 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 1,785 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 May 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 126 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 43.6% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 34.5% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.45% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @protasev_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Любимые девушки, давайте проясню важные моменты: 1. Здоровые отношения, в которых вам обоим будет хорошо - на страхе НЕ построить, никогда и никак. Страх проявляется попытками доказать, заслужить, вернуть, лишь бы не оказаться в ситуации «жизнь без него», потому что там пустота, и как там не знаю, «не представляю». 2. «Не интересна ему как женщина, равнодушен, … даже как мама», а с мамой не спят, это ин*ест уже ка…
👌7❤1💯1
От депрессии и мыслей о разводе до подарков, комплиментов и внимания от мужа впервые за 8 лет ДО: ❌ Жила в роли жертвы, винила во всём мужа и обстоятельства ❌ В депрессии, на самом дне, в полном отчаянии ❌ Держала мужа «за горло», давила слезами и упрёками ❌ Муж не проявлял инициативу, ни в отношениях, ни в семье ❌ Откладывала свою жизнь и важные дела «до возвращения мужа» ❌ Хотела быть незаметной и получалось ❌ Меч…
🔥3
Люблю такие на ночь отзывы. От тревоги, трясучки и проблем в отношениях - до расслабления, спокойствия, уравновешенности, предвкушения нового. Рад тем кто приходит и открыт новому, и самое важное делает 💪
Секрет здоровой семьи - не компромиссы, а здоровая психика каждого члена семьи!
❤2💯1
Контроль = жизнь через ограничения. Спонтанность = жизнь через разрешение Сидим вчера на завтраке в отеле с супругой. Она услышала знакомый голос, полезла в интернет и убедилась - за соседним столом Яна Чурикова с мужем. Я спрашиваю: «Хочешь подойти, познакомиться, сфоткаться?» Супруга: «Нууу нет, неудобно наверное. Я как женщина ее понимаю, не хочу отвлекать…" И понеслось. Мозг начал выдавать один весомый довод …
👍6❤4
Едем из Спб в Краснодар, беседуем, слушаем аудио книги. И вопрос к вам возник, каких отношений вы хотите? И как сами считаете что мешает такие построить? Навыки, установки, время, убеждения, ресурсы, …. Поделитесь в комментариях 👇
Супер насыщенные выходные. Ролики. Сапы. Посиделки с друзьями
КОНЕЦ ЧЕМУ ТО СТАРОМУ = ВОЗМОЖНОСТЬ НАЧАТЬ ПО НОВОМУ Когда всё хорошо - ты просто живёшь и не думаешь. А когда начинается драма (бросили/ушел/изменил/…) вот тут начинается самое интересное. После разрыва ты остаёшься один на один с собой. И в этой тишине слышно только одно - твои сомнения. «Не так сказала», «надо было быть другой», «он нашёл лучше». Ты начинаешь перебирать себя по косточкам и верить, что ты у не …
❤1
Осваиваю ролики, не стоял лет 30 на них. Вообще уже давно понял, что всякие залы, тренажеры - это скука скучная и в приоритете чтобы мне было весело и интересно заниматься, а во вторую очередь уже про эффективность и тд.
👍4
До 1. Мир и будущее → чёрные тона. 2. Ощущение → болото, безысходность. 3. Действия → не знала, что делать. После 1. Появилась уверенность. 2. Есть инструменты: если не знаю, как поступить → знаю, как это узнать. 3. Начала выбирать себя. 4. Делаю то, о чём раньше не думала и не мечтала. P.S. Отношения меняются, когда меняешься.
❤1
Второстепенность в собственной жизни
От дискомфорта, слез от боли - к радости, спокойствию и умиротворению. Все проще и ближе чем кажется. Только для тех кто готов что то менять и не согласен с текущими результатами. Выбор есть всегда
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @protasev_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максим Протасьев | Про отношения” (@protasev_psy), 1,783 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/protasev_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.