Channel
@prostilno_s_julia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
178subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002413440520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prostilno_s_julia |
| Description | Помогаю женщинам соответствовать своему масштабу. Система образа вместо хаоса в шкафу. Про статус, уверенность и рост. Мой канал в Макс https://max.ru/join/ptYfO77YJ2wa54R7ArlEIPS07nj1484ovaV-S6-boXY |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prostilno_s_julia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 178 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 178 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:50 | 179 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (23 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 845 |
| Reactions total | 122 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 22.1% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 12.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 9.84% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 9.84% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 5.74% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 2.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда достаточно 10 минут, чтобы понять, почему в шкафу много одежды, а надеть все равно нечего. Или увидеть, как одна небольшая деталь меняет весь образ. Именно поэтому я собрала небольшое пространство, где можно не просто почитать обо мне, а буквально пройтись по моему миру. Внутри вас ждут: • подарок - Гайд по подбору цвета; • реальные кейсы моих клиенток; • мини-разборы и преображения; • отзывы; • закулисье…
🔥5❤🔥4👍3
Проверка на дружбу пройдена! С любовью и неиссякаемым чувством юмора! Пусть говорят, что дружбы женской не бывает, пускай болтают! Но мы знаем, что когда встречаемся, нам очень классно вместе! Не разгонишь!😁 А у вас есть такая подруга, которая может полежать, ой, не так, которая может поддержать? Любимая рубрика #шутитьизволите
😁6👍4🔥4🤩4❤2❤🔥2💋1
СТИЛЬ НАЧИНАЕТСЯ НЕ С ОДЕЖДЫ🩷 Я до сих пор учусь, наблюдаю и меняюсь. Вместе с этим меняется мой взгляд на стиль. Наверное, именно поэтому мои консультации давно стали не только про одежду. Если вам близка мысль, что стиль начинается с отношения к себе, нам точно по пути. Если хотите, чтобы ваш внешний образ наконец начал соответствовать вашему внутреннему масштабу, оставайтесь🧡
❤4🥰4👍3👏3
В какой момент женщина выбирает себя? Эта неделя была для меня очень особенной. Мы с Наташей говорили о лете. Но, если честно, совсем не о времени года, мы больше говорили о жизни, о том, как часто откладываем себя на потом. Новое платье, на отпуск, яркую помаду - на праздник, шорты, когда похудею, .Фотографии начну делать, «когда буду выглядеть лучше». И знаете… наверное, именно поэтому эта тема так откликнулас…
❤4👍4👏3
Мой жизненный принцип: Никогда не знаешь, куда тебя пригласит жизнь. Поэтому... паспорт, фата и купальник всегда с собой!😉
🔥6😁6🤩3❤🔥1
ПОЧЕМУ МЫ ТАК ЧАСТО ЖДЕМ ПОДХОДЯЩЕГО МОМЕНТА? Сегодня прочитала пост Наташи и поймала себя на мысли… За годы работы стилистом я много раз слышала похожие фразы. ❌️Вот похудею, тогда куплю платье ❌️Вот будет отпуск, тогда начну красиво одеваться ❌️Вот появится повод… И знаете, что происходит чаще всего? Повод не находится, лето проходит, а привычка откладывать себя остается. Поэтому, мне так откликаются слова На…
❤4❤🔥3👍3👏2
Задумывались когда-нибудь о том, почему нам так трудно разрешить себе отдыхать? А я поймала себя на другой мысли. Иногда мы точно так же откладываем не только отдых, но и удовольствие красиво одеваться. Кажется: Вот поеду в отпуск, тогда достану любимое платье. Но ведь лето не живет только в отпуске, оно может быть и в обычном дне, почему не вторник, повод порадовать себя. И самое приятное, что летом совсем не обя…
❤5👍3❤🔥2👏2💋2
Лето не начинается с отпуска.🏖 Оно начинается с отражения в зеркале. Замечали, как часто мы откладываем себя? ✔️Вот похудею, тогда куплю красивое платье. ✔️Вот поеду в отпуск, тогда буду наряжаться. ✔️Вот появится повод… И лето проходит в привычных футболках, случайных шортах и одежде «лишь бы удобно», а ведь ощущение лета рождается не только из погоды. Оно рождается в тот момент, когда вам нравится женщина, кото…
❤8👍7👏5
File, posted without a caption
Дорогие, делюсь с вами записью эфира с врачом нутрициологом.
ИНОГДА ЖЕНЩИНЕ КАЖЕТСЯ, ЧТО ЕЙ НУЖНА НОВАЯ ОДЕЖДА! На самом деле, ей нужен всего один взгляд со стороны, чтобы увидеть, сколько красоты уже есть. ✅ Чтобы понять, какие вещи действительно работают на неё. ✅ И перестать покупать новое только потому, что старое кажется «каким-то не таким». Часто проблема не в гардеробе, а проблема в том, что никто не показал, как его увидеть по-новому.
Козина Наталья врач клинико лабораторной диагностики, доказательный нутрициолог. На эфире поговорили: ✅ Кто такой нутрициолог и с какими вопросами к нему действительно стоит обращаться. ✅ Почему летом мы часто набираем вес, хотя кажется, что едим меньше. ✅ Три простых привычки, которые работают уже сегодня. ✅ Практика "Колесо здоровья", наглядно увидеть ваши привычки .
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @prostilno_s_julia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Открыть вам доступ к эфиру с врачом нутрициологом - встреча в моем закрытом клубе
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 280,330 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СТИЛЬНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ” (@prostilno_s_julia), 178 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prostilno_s_julia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.