Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПРОЖЕКТЁР | проектный менеджмент и бизнес-анализ

@projectpixie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

417subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946059604
TypeChannel
Username@projectpixie
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/projectpixie

Growth

4178 Aug 2026, 11:31 — 417 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:03 — 417 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:318 Aug 2026, 18:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 416–418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:03417no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:31417first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 12 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5343.4%
🔥3226.2%
😁1411.5%
👍108.20%
❤‍🔥54.10%
🤣54.10%
🤯32.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 12:09 UTC402 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дамы с 8 марта💐. Спасибо что делаете проекты лучше, несмотря не на что🎉.

6

8 Mar 2026, 12:09 UTC404 viewsread 8 August 2026

Подъехали и поздравления от подписчика:

8 Mar 2026, 12:08 UTC383 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие подписчицы, с 8 марта, с международным женским днём нас всех! Мы сильные, смелые, мощные, как лапищи у волчищи, мы все можем, если хотим, так что желаю вам мочь и хотеть, чего хочется (а чего не хочется - не хотеть, шо я, не человек что ли) 😂 Всем хорошего дна! P. S.: цветочек сегодня такой, потому что я хочу булочку и какаву, но вам желаю букетов любых, какие нравятся 👩‍🍳

7❤‍🔥3😁3

5 Mar 2026, 09:22 UTC412 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как вы видите, произошли некоторые ✨изменения✨ и старый потс-знакомство больше не актуален, поэтому (!) вот вам новый пост-знакомство: Привет! Меня зовут Арина, я менеджер проектов и бизнес-аналитик с 9+ лет опыта, из них 7+ в ИТ-проектах (разработка ПО, внедрение изменений, написание требований, анализ и изменение бизнес-процессов, и вот это вот все). Мне 34 года, в прошлом я преподаватель (бухучет и менеджмент),

12🔥6

5 Mar 2026, 08:11 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «ПРОЖЕКТЁР | проектный менеджмент и бизнес-анализ»

4 Mar 2026, 11:52 UTC301 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В общем, что имею сказать: вот появились эти новые требования на уровне законодательства, если бы я применяла какие-то комплаенс-меры, то еще в январе-феврале я бы и проработала новый нейминг, и вас бы к нему подвела, так? Так. Комплаенс, как мы знаем вами, понятие намного ширше, чем если бы мы говорили о медицине или банкинге, это про соответствие нормам и требованиям, регулированию, в чем-то равно превентивному та

🔥86❤‍🔥2

23 Feb 2026, 18:12 UTC313 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

выбираем варианты, чтоб переименовать нас и как-то чтоб и не обидно было, и чтоб понятное что-то про проекты, аналитику

  1. прожект ведьма40%
  2. прожектёр13%
  3. ПоПроекту13%
  4. проектант3%
  5. проектный анализатор0%
  6. проектология / проектоведенье3%
  7. Что по проекту?13%
  8. Проектопроектор 🤡5%
  9. У меня свой вариант, и я его несу в комменты13%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Feb 2026, 13:36 UTC257 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vamvtg

Что теперь делать с иностранными названиями каналов? Давайте разбираться! С 1 марта 2026 года вступает в силу 168-ФЗ о защите прав потребителя и запрете иностранных слов в рекламе. И вот что это значит для телеграмщиков… ✔️ Если вы рекламируете свой канал, то его название должно быть на русском языке. Всякие англицизмы берём только если они есть в словарях (шопинг — да, лайфхак — нет) ✔️Хотите оставить латиницу? Пр

23 Feb 2026, 13:36 UTC238 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну что, драгоценные, давайте думать, подсказывайте, во что будем меня переименовывать? Ей-богу, мне нужна помощь и какие-то размышления

🤯3

20 Feb 2026, 08:01 UTC345 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну штош, драгоценные, я вчера была на митапе Mentor in Tech от Women in Tech Russia и Women in Big Data на площадке Garage Eight, были итоги менторского потока 7.0, дележка опытов, впечатлений и эмоциев (последних было много), а еще были групповые менторинг-сессии, и я сходила на такую в качестве менти к замечательной Наташе Леоновой (нужен ли аналитику психоаналитик) Еще я мужественно вписывалась во все диалоги, ко

14🔥8

12 Feb 2026, 14:17 UTC231 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я надеюсь, что смогу и буду там лично, а вообще в этом году был прям классный поток и опыт, я обязательно напишу, как он прошел!

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @projectpixie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Feb 2026, 18:12 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

выбираем варианты, чтоб переименовать нас и как-то чтоб и не обидно было, и чтоб понятное что-то про проекты, аналитику

  1. прожект ведьма40%
  2. прожектёр13%
  3. ПоПроекту13%
  4. проектант3%
  5. проектный анализатор0%
  6. проектология / проектоведенье3%
  7. Что по проекту?13%
  8. Проектопроектор 🤡5%
  9. У меня свой вариант, и я его несу в комменты13%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 8 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 505,569 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПРОЖЕКТЁР | проектный менеджмент и бизнес-анализ” (@projectpixie), 417 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projectpixie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.