Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Профи MLM | Станислав Санников

Channel

Профи MLM | Станислав Санников

@profimlm_sss

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,607subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001187071369
TypeChannel
Username@profimlm_sss
Description🏆Эксперт №1 по МЛМ в русскоязычном пространстве ❗️Данный канал нейтрален. 😈Вопросы про MLM здесь: https://t.me/+z_UssxqYlwRhMzQy ❓Все вопросы и предложения по взаимодействию: @Profimlm_Sannikov_bot
Created20 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/profimlm_sss

Growth

17,60717,71917,6636 August 2026 — 17,719 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,668 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,662 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,664 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,656 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,653 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,649 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,633 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,618 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,624 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,615 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,618 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,621 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,618 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,620 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,615 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,609 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,612 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,607 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,590–17,736 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 03:1417,607-5
27 Aug 2026, 06:1217,612+3
26 Aug 2026, 05:0817,609-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:3617,615-5
23 Aug 2026, 22:5317,620+2
22 Aug 2026, 06:3617,618-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:3417,621+3
19 Aug 2026, 17:4217,618+3
18 Aug 2026, 19:4617,615-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:2317,624+2
17 Aug 2026, 17:4217,622no change
16 Aug 2026, 16:1417,622+4
15 Aug 2026, 02:3917,618-15
13 Aug 2026, 18:1717,633-16
12 Aug 2026, 16:4517,649-4
11 Aug 2026, 16:5517,653-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:0817,656-8
9 Aug 2026, 21:1217,664+2
8 Aug 2026, 17:4117,662-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:4417,668first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.04%
avg views ÷ 17,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held29 (7 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total30,825
Reactions total772
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,420
Videos
442
Links
1,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 25s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

772 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍26434.2%
🔥25633.2%
14719.0%
👏597.64%
😁364.66%
🤔81.04%
custom 581905277904119766910.13%
👎10.13%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 772reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 29 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @profimlm_sss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC266 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Помните базовое правило рекрутинга: сначала индивидуальная встреча, потом групповая. Почему? - если кандидат придет сразу на групповую - он закроется и не будет слушать. Ибо сначала выстраиваются отношения, потом дается мотивация/вдохновение. Пытаться давать мотивацию/вдохновение тому, кто тебе не доверяет - бесполезно. Сначала отношения/доверие (индивидуальная встреча) Потом мотивация/вдохновение (групповая встр

9👍5👏1

27 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC496 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Темп встреч. Если вы не проводите 4-6 рекрутинговых встреч в день - вы не работаете. На глубину или ширину - не важно. 4-6 встреч в день. Каждый день. 2-3 года. Тогда будут и ранги и деньги. Если вы этого еще не поняли и не усвоили - срочно поймите.

19🔥14👍7

25 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC582 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @NetworkExpertBizVideo

🙋‍♂Сетевая среда. Истории успеха лидеров MLM Завтра в 11:00 МСК в чате конференции NetConf 2026 состоится прямой эфир-интервью с Асель Жээналиевой. Будьте вовремя! Ждём каждого из Вас - https://vk.me/join/LQ3VYWxBSo/OyIuElNjOFh5HsK2IFJ3WNw8= 💻Официальный канал Network Expert Подпишитесь сейчас, чтобы не пропустить важные новости: @NetworkExpertBiz

9👏2🔥2👍1

24 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC905 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Калобка я конечно не смотрел ибо практически всё российское кино - это шлак запредельный. Только для людей без вкуса и понятия об эстетике и чем-то качественном. Но я начал смотреть человека-паука и просто ОФИГЕЛ. Графика из 2010х, сценарий на уровне колобка. Да, я в принципе понимал, что базовый тест на IQ это вопрос: "Как ты относишься к MARVEL?". Ну не настолько же! Кошмар. Оказалось, российские чиновники смогли

👍126🔥6👏1

20 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,390 views59 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Запуск новичка (вырезка из одного из эфиров сегодня)

🔥33👍157👏2🤔2

20 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC≈1,190 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥27👍93👏2

18 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,350 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🙅‍♂️Семья не верит в сетевой бизнес? Не пытайтесь её рекрутировать Семья и близкие друзья — одна из самых сложных аудиторий для рекрутинга. Поэтому на первоначальном этапе я рекомендую не пытаться сразу звать их в бизнес. 💙В этом видео я рассказываю про два подхода, которые помогут вам вырасти в глазах вашей семьи. А ваши близкие поддерживали вас, когда вы только начинали в сетевом бизнесе? Напишите в комментариях

👍226👏6🔥2🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,030 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Мало кто сделал для меня столько доброго и полезного, сколько Оксана С Днем Рождения, Оксаночка!❤️

20👏3🔥3👍1🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC917 views51 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @NetworkExpertBizPhoto

🤩 Сегодня мы поздравляем Генерального Директора Network Expert Оксану Пишонину с днём рождения! Желаем крепкого здоровья, неиссякаемого оптимизма и смелости для новых амбициозных задач. ✅ Пусть каждый проект приносит удовлетворение, партнёры становятся ближе, а команда — ещё сильнее. Желаем ярких профессиональных побед и моментов, которые заряжают личной радостью и смыслом. С праздником 🎁 Команда Network Expert

👏2516🔥6👍2🤔2

17 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,190 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Я тут что то решил Запретграмом позаниматься Выпустил первый "Колхозный рилс"😁 ⁉️Поддержите? ⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️ https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcI661dIqZg/?igsh=MXk5dzNsdmJ6ZXA3

👍63🤔2👏1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,080 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Чтобы найти лидеров, будьте лидерами. Займите лидерскую позицию. Начните действовать! #мысльдня

👍15🔥146

16 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,400 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Похоже после недавней игры у меня появился свой гимн 😁

🔥27👍8👏4custom 58190527790411976691

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @profimlm_sss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTCAnonymous Poll96 voters

⁉️Какой метод приглашения на встречу по бизнесу Вы используете?

  1. Звонок по телефону24%
  2. Переписка в мессенджерах38%
  3. Оба варианта39%
  4. Не приглашаю на встречи9%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 152,424 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fabula AI • Нейросеть для селлеров
@fabula_community · 125,755
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
Екатерина Волкова | Женское здоровье 35+
@volkovaekaterina2024 · 54,975
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Siberian Wellness. PRO БАД
@rusiberianwellness · 78,468
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
Для женщин про здоровье
@volkovaforwomen · 276,175
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
⚕️ Дмитрий Семирядов️️ / Превентивный врач, нутрициолог / dsemiryadov
@dsemiryadov_official · 76,174
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Профи MLM | Станислав Санников” (@profimlm_sss), 17,607 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profimlm_sss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.