12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,199–11,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 23:43
11,454
+31
16 Aug 2026, 21:53
11,423
+27
15 Aug 2026, 16:57
11,396
+33
14 Aug 2026, 05:45
11,363
+20
12 Aug 2026, 23:02
11,343
+7
12 Aug 2026, 01:52
11,336
+32
11 Aug 2026, 03:51
11,304
+46
10 Aug 2026, 01:26
11,258
+26
8 Aug 2026, 22:24
11,232
-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:48
11,237
-11
6 Aug 2026, 19:56
11,248
-14
6 Aug 2026, 08:18
11,262
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 11,454 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
27 (4 June 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
19,250
Reactions total
721
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,137 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,287
60.2%
🔥
540
25.3%
👍
261
12.2%
🙏
24
1.12%
😢
16
0.749%
🤔
9
0.421%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @producer_orhan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Не будь гнилым лимоном 🍋
Так называется книга, которая вышла у Софии Болховитиной — с ней мы недавно записали выпуск про конфликты.
Идея в названии простая: люди как лимоны в ящике, где один подгнивший портит остальные. И вопрос не в том, как найти ящик получше.
Подумал, что книга прямо перекликается с нашим подкастом, поэтому хочу её порекомендовать как продолжение нашей беседы. Там тоже про личные границы, про с…
Снимаем фильм.
О времени, когда старое уже не работает, а новое ещё не появилось.
И о том, что у всего есть «год спустя». Даже у того, что сейчас кажется концом.
27 августа.
А что вообще значит «выживать»?
Всё думаю после вчерашнего поста и ваших комментов. Вот бывает реальное выживание — это когда нечем платить за жильё или есть угроза здоровью. Тут всё понятно.
Но мы часто ощущаем себя в режиме «я выживаю» тогда, когда жизни ничего не угрожает. Вот это мне и стало интересно.
Одна из подписчиц вчера написала: у меня две работы, своя практика, тружусь шесть дней в неделю, а ещё учёба.…
Выживать умеем. А жить?
Спросил у вас на прошлой неделе, когда вы в последний раз чувствовали, что не справляетесь. Прочитал все ответы и вот что заметил:
никто не складывал лапки. Наоборот: все собирались и фигачили! Работали допоздна. Проходили через разводы, суды, потерю работы, болезни близких.
А заканчивалось почти каждое сообщение похоже: «наверное, я недостаточно стараюсь». Вот тут я и подумал: блин, какая-…
Оказывается, у личных границ есть три стадии.
Первая — ты удобный человек. Соглашаешься, терпишь, стараешься никого не расстраивать.
Вторая — умеешь говорить нет, но пока через агрессию. Как будто каждый раз нужно доказать своё право на личные границы.
И третья — свобода. Это когда уже не нужно ни защищаться, ни оправдываться. Можно просто сказать: «а знаешь, мне это не подходит».
Кажется, большинство из нас живё…
Почему мы сами создаем себе проблемы
Вчера виделся с близким другом, с кем не виделись больше полутора лет. А он проходит прямо оооочень тяжёлый период сейчас. Тот случай, когда слушаешь, и всё, что хочется сделать — просто обнять.
До разговора думал, что это у меня не всё гладко: вот мол рынок штормит, бизнес штормит, турбулентность. Но после понял, что у меня еще всё очень даже стабильно 🙂
Спросил, как он вообще…
Никто не знает, что будет дальше: как не разрушить себя тревогой. Новый выпуск уже на канале ⚡️
Что делать, когда мир больше не даёт опоры и всё, на что ты рассчитывал, рушится?
Поговорили с моим другом Артёмом Агабековым о том, почему неопределённость — это не враг, где искать внутреннюю устойчивость, как вернуть интерес к жизни и зачем иногда важно просто прожить сложный период, а не убегать от него.
Обсудили:
—…
Главная вещь в бизнесе, о которой почти никто не говорит
Моя коллега по ютубу Оля Соколова (вы видели её у меня в подкастах) сняла шикарную документалку про менеджемент!
С годами я всё больше убеждаюсь: именно менеджмент, а не только идея и маркетинг, решает, получится проект или он утонет в хаосе.
Вообще Оля — та, кем я искренне восхищаюсь! Феноменальная карьера — от младшего партнера в McKinsey до CEO крупной се…
Проснулся сегодня с чувством тепла и благодарности в теле. Знаете, когда накануне сделал что-то классное, чем сам очень гордишься — и тебя накрывает смесь радости и удовлетворения от проделанной работы.
Это мы стартовали вчера вечером второй сезон «Внутри спокойно».
630 участников. 160 городов. 39 стран. Исследующие себя и свою самооценку.
Честно говоря, было волнительно 😅 Но после первого занятия пришла мощная во…
Я годами не любил себя. Пик был лет в 14, когда я откровенно презирал свою внешность, национальность, голос. Годами я хотел просто слиться с фоном и быть как все. Стереть свою идентичность.
В общем, детство, отрочество и далее сформировали очень простую установку — «просто так меня любить нельзя». Что я как я никому не нужен. И что любовь нужно заслужить — работой, достижениями, действиями.
Проблема в том, что эта …
Ищем своих в команду «Внутри спокойно»
Наш проект по ментальному здоровью «Внутри спокойно» растёт — и вот уже я ищу людей в команду. Возможно, это вы 🤗
Сейчас открыто три позиции, все про контент и маркетинг:
— Head of Content & Growth
— Старший редактор
— Внештатный автор по психологии
Наш проект для тех, кто хочет развивать культуру ментального здоровья на русском языке и кому важна работа со смыслом.
Вот тут …
❤32🔥15👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @producer_orhan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@producer_orhan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 95,593 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продюсер всего” (@producer_orhan), 11,454 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/producer_orhan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
