Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки продакта | Павел Габедава

@prodtracker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

188subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002747725047
TypeChannel
Username@prodtracker
DescriptionРеальный опыт, инсайты и факапы продуктового управления, без воды и с тёплым человеческим лицом. Связь: @pavelgabedava. Присоединяйся, если хочешь не только знать теорию, но и видеть, как она реально работает!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/prodtracker

Growth

1888 Aug 2026, 07:45 — 188 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:04 — 188 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:458 Aug 2026, 12:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 187–189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:04188no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:45188first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.2%
avg views ÷ 188 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 February 20266 August 2026)
Views total266
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
60
Videos
2
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4535.2%
4232.8%
👍3225.0%
🤝43.13%
💯32.34%
custom 537093606483795090921.56%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 19 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prodtracker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC55 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔈 «Отложили до Q3» Звучит мягко. Как очередь. Как забота о фокусе. На деле часто — отказ без подписи. Вот язык, которым хоронят правильные инициативы. Не криком — вежливостью. 🎯 «Перенесём без потери фокуса». 🎯 «Сейчас не до этого». 🎯 «Мы же обсуждали — помните?» 🎯 Серый кружок Parked в трекере. Ни одного «нет». И ни одного слота в roadmap. ⭐ Правильное ≠ приоритет В корпорации легко перепутать согласие и решение.

🔥31👍1

28 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC80 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔈 Что называют фидбеком — и что это на деле В корпорации слово «фидбек» часто прикрывает три разные вещи. 🎯 Снять напряжение: сказал «мне не нравится» — стало легче. Команде — нет. 🎯 Показать экспертность: длинный разбор на демо, где половина про ваш вкус. Звучит умно. Дальше — ноль действий. 🎯 И редко — инструмент решения: после него яснее, что делать, что не делать и по какому критерию спорить. Жёстко — нормально

🔥4💯1

14 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓ Когда последний раз задача в Jira изменила вашу стратегию — а не наоборот? Если честно — у большинства ответ «не помню». И это не потому, что команда «не читает стратегию». Я сам после квартальных сессий чувствовал облегчение: слайды сошлись, OKR красивые, руководство кивнуло — можно жить. Jira при этом не закрывается: sprint идёт, тикеты копятся. Связь со слайдами проверяешь не каждый понедельник — а когда смотриш

🔥41

3 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTCviews —

Записки продакта | Павел Габедава pinned a photo

3 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC150 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔍🔍🔍🔍 В поисках продуктового аналитика в Т-Банк — приложение Майти Знакомый нанимает в команду. Даю в канале, потому что верю, что так быстрее найдём своего человека. 🎓 Продукт: 🎯 Мобильное приложение для сотрудников Майти — путь от найма и адаптации до ежедневной работы и обучения. 🎯 Десятки тысяч пользователей. Персонализация по ролям: люди видят свои сценарии, не свалку функций. 🎯 Это не ритейл-приложение с краси

2🔥2👍1

28 Jun 2026, 13:28 UTC162 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 «Команда из одного человека» Фраза, которую я вижу в каждом втором тренде в ленте. Cursor, агенты, MVP за выходные. Лайки — огонь. Комментарии: «вот будущее продакта». Действительно ли все так радужно? ❓ Давайте разбираться 🎯Правда из ленты. На ранней гипотезе один продакт уже может дотащить «идея → кликабельный прототип → первый фидбэк» без очереди в Jira. Я это видел своими глазами, да и делал своими руками. 🎯Пр

4🔥2👍1

13 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC137 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 97% продактов уже в AI. 77% компаний не видят эффекта. Недавно на Conversations один из главных докладов назывался «Культурный долг: скрытая цена AI-трансформации». Я вспомнил воркшоп с Cursor: за 6 часов команда собрала прототипы, research, даже черновик системы ассессмента продактов. Все ушли заряженные. А через месяц: «Кто что реально внедрил?». Тишина. Не потому что AI не работает. Потому что пилот ≠ продукт.

👍2🤝2🔥1

7 Jun 2026, 11:26 UTC139 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

❗️ Официальная инфляция — 5–6%. В магазине — «всё подорожало вдвое». Кто врёт? Короткий ответ: никто. Просто все меряют разное. В посте про причины тревожности одной из причин была инфляция. Сегодня разберу эту тему подробнее в том числе на своем личном опыте. ❓ Что такое «официальная» инфляция Росстат считает индекс цен производителей по огромной корзине — 500+ товаров и услуг: от хлеба и бензина до телевизоров, с

👍4🔥2

20 May 2026, 10:02 UTC165 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 «Кадров не хватает» — одна из самых раздражающих фраз последнего года. Особенно когда ты ищешь работу 5 месяцев и ловишь 0 офферов. ❗️ Недавно общался со знакомым продактом. Он вкатился через курсы в 2025. Обещали: «удалёнка, 300k, быстро зайдёшь». Сделал всё «по учебнику»: резюме, портфолио, отклики. 200+ откликов → тишина. На каком-то этапе он перестал переписывать резюме и начал задавать другой вопрос: «а я воо

6👍2💯1🔥1

7 May 2026, 17:02 UTC162 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Тревога по заказу: как паблики продают вам ощущение катастрофы В последнее время тревожность у людей перестала быть реакцией на новости — она стала фоновой музыкой дня. Уверен, вам тоже знакомо это чувство, когда ты не можешь понять, почему что-то запрещают, усложняют, а нормальной коммуникации нет. Люди не просто переживают период, они живут в режиме негативного потока, усиленного пабликами, лентами и тревожными

👍92🤝2🔥1

2 May 2026, 18:34 UTC159 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 «Хочу больше денег» — самая популярная и самая пустая цель, которую я слышал и ставил себе сам. Я тоже проходил этот путь: первые серьёзные деньги → эйфория → быстрое привыкание → новая планка → тревога. И в какой-то момент ловишь себя на мысли: «А что именно я пытаюсь закрыть?» Этот вопрос неприятный, но без него деньги начинают управлять тобой. 🌟 Реальность, о которой редко говорят: Богатство не равно спокойств

🔥52custom 53709360648379509092

21 Apr 2026, 16:21 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Миграция — это не продукт. Но команды упорно делают вид, что дедлайн = ценность. Кейс: вендор уходит — KPI один: «перенести X% функционала к сроку». Всё подчинено миграции. Бэклог растёт из списка «что было», а не «что нужно». В итоге: фичи переехали, но поведение пользователей не изменилось. Где-то вырос latency, где-то просел SLA, часть сценариев вообще умерла — но формально цель достигнута. ❗️ Главная ловушка:

👍53

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prodtracker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Feb 2026, 09:03 UTCFinal Results22 voters

Какая из гипотез роста в предыдущем посте корректная?

  1. 1. Про проценты по кредитам.36%
  2. 2. Про смену цвета кнопки "Открыть вклад".9%
  3. 3. Про новые костюмы для курьеров, доставляющих карты.9%
  4. 4. Про предиктивные предложения по открытию банковских продуктов.45%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 637,926 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки продакта | Павел Габедава” (@prodtracker), 188 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prodtracker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.