Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Processo em Pauta - Carlos Frederico Bastos Pereira

Channel

Processo em Pauta - Carlos Frederico Bastos Pereira

@processoempautacarlosfrederico

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

917subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312659733
TypeChannel
Username@processoempautacarlosfrederico
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/processoempautacarlosfrederico

Growth

9179199187 August 2026 — 919 subscribers8 August 2026 — 919 subscribers16 August 2026 — 918 subscribers24 August 2026 — 917 subscribers31 August 2026 — 918 subscribers9 September 2026 — 917 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 917–919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 13:17917-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:37918+1
24 Aug 2026, 12:46917-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:37918-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:01919no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:15919first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026

Habemus relevância! https://conjur.com.br/2026-ago-04/lula-sanciona-sem-vetos-lei-que-cria-filtro-da-relevancia-no-stj/

3 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026

Aproveito para divulgar meu texto sobre o assunto: https://www.academia.edu/128829129/Print_de_WhatsApp_como_prova_no_processo_civil

3 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026

Excelente post do professor e amigo Ravi Peixoto sobre print de WhatsApp como prova: https://www.instagram.com/p/DblpW_3mdzD/?img_index=1

30 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC136 viewsread 8 August 2026

Recomendo a leitura desse texto de Paulo Mendes projetando questões que surgirão no STJ com a relevância do recurso especial. https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/relevancia-do-recurso-especial-como-funcionara-o-stj-com-o-novo-filtro

30 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026

Mudança no CPC: a nova lei acrescenta o art. 529-A ao CPC, autorizando o credor a requerer ao juiz a transferência automática da pensão alimentícia via pix. https://www.migalhas.com.br/quentes/461272/lula-sanciona-pix-pensao-para-pagamento-automatico-de-alimentos

24 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC144 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

Segue o Substitutivo do Senado ao Projeto de Lei nº 2.239, de 2022, que “Altera a Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015 (Código de Processo Civil), para estabelecer critérios para a concessão de gratuidade da justiça”.

24 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC122 viewsread 8 August 2026

ACESSO À JUSTIÇA EM PAUTA: LITIGÂNCIA PREDATÓRIA/ABUSIVA, GRATUIDADE DE JUSTIÇA E INTERESSE DE AGIR Texto de Luciano Benetti Timm e Flávio Luiz Yarshell para reflexão. O acesso à justiça é um dos grandes temas atuais do processo civil brasileiro. Após o intenso debate sobre a litigância abusiva e predatória, a gratuidade da justiça desponta como o próximo eixo de discussão. Recentemente, o STJ julgou o Tema Repeti

24 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC90 viewsread 8 August 2026

Decisão de difícil compreensão do STJ, considerando que o Código autoriza a apresentação da reconvenção na própria petição de contestação (art. 343) e a impugnação das decisões interlocutórias não agraváveis nas contrarrazões de apelação (art. 1.009, § 1º). Se o recurso adesivo estiver claramente destacado e individualizado na própria petição de contrarrazões, não há qualquer dificuldade para o exercício do direito

24 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC77 viewsread 8 August 2026

Sou suspeito para falar, já que fiz doutorado lá, mas recomendo o texto do Professor José Rogério Cruz e Tucci. Não deixa de ser uma parte importante da historiografia acadêmica do Direito Processual Civil brasileiro. https://www.conjur.com.br/2026-jul-24/tradicao-de-excelencia-cientifica-do-departamento-de-direito-processual-do-largo-de-sao-francisco/

22 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026

LEI NOVA: NATUREZA ALIMENTAR E PRIVILÉGIO DOS HONORÁRIOS ADVOCATÍCIOS Foi publicada hoje a Lei nº 15.472, que altera os arts. 22 e 24 do Estatuto da Advocacia para explicitar a natureza alimentar dos honorários advocatícios e reforçar seu tratamento privilegiado. A nova redação do art. 22, § 9º, estabelece que os honorários decorrentes da prestação de serviços profissionais: • constituem direito dos advogados insc

22 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 8 August 2026

Fala, pessoal Tudo bem? Gravei um vídeo destacando 5 pontos para prestarmos atenção com a instituição da lei regulamentadora da relevância no recurso especial, que está na iminência de ser aprovada: 1. Enunciado Administrativo nº 8 do STJ 2. Lógica equivalente à repercussão geral do STF 3. Mudança na estrutura da peça do recurso especial 4. Hipóteses de presunção de relevância 5. Impactos sistêmicos no CPC Espero

21 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC85 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @transformacoesnoprocesso

Novo volume da Civil Procedure Review (2025.3) - neste volume, saem algumas das contribuições nacionais e internacionais do II Congresso Brasil-Peru

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @processoempautacarlosfrederico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Processo em Pauta - Carlos Frederico Bastos Pereira” (@processoempautacarlosfrederico), 917 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/processoempautacarlosfrederico.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.