Channel
@frediedidier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,397subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001267957384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frediedidier |
| Description | O 'Megafone do Processo Civil - Fredie Didier Jr.' é o canal do Telegram, de perfil acadêmico, com propósito de compartilhar artigos, livros, julgados etc. relacionados à Teoria Geral do Processo e ao Direito Processual Civil. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frediedidier |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 8,397 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 8,406 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 8,418 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 8,421 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 8,417 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 8,422 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 8,420 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (5 July 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,582 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recomendo a leitura desse texto escrito por Luis Felipe Salomão (Ministro Presidente do STJ), Marco Aurélio Bellizze Oliveira (Ministro do STJ), Fernando da Fonseca Gajardoni (Secretário Judicial da Presidência do STJ) e Marcelo Ornellas Marchiori (Secretário de Gestão de Precedentes do STJ). https://www.migalhas.com.br/depeso/463098/a-relevancia-da-questao-federal-no-regimento-interno-do-stj
Segue Nota Técnica produzida pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual sobre o projeto de lei que tramita no Congresso Nacional para introduzir no CPC um procedimento para homologação judicial de acordos obtidos extrajudicialmente.
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Segue Nota Técnica produzida pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual sobre o projeto de lei que tramita no Congresso Nacional para aprimorar o regramento da produção antecipada de prova
File, posted without a caption
Segue para sanção o PLP que altera o CTN prevendo várias normas referentes à solução consensual de disputas em matéria tributária e aduaneira. Dentre elas, destaco: - previsão autorizativa de arbitragem e mediação (a depender de lei específica) - suspensão do crédito tributário quando as partes convencionarem, por negócios jurídicos materiais ou processuais, garantias e seguros ao crédito tributário; - disciplina ma…
Bom dia . Mais uma pequena contribuição para o debate acerca do “novo modelo” de atuação junto ao STJ. Texto escrito com o Prof. Ravi Peixoto. https://conjur.com.br/2026-ago-13/relevancia-da-questao-federal-e-o-resgate-do-cabimento-de-reclamacao-no-stj/
Nossa rede segue com mais uma edição do projeto Clube de Leitoras e Leitores de Direito Processual. O segundo encontro será realizado no dia 03/09, às 17h30, no Rio de Janeiro, quando teremos a oportunidade de debater a obra da professora @sofiatemer 📍 Ministério Público Federal (Av. Nilo Peçanha, nº 31, auditório do 6º andar, Centro, Rio de Janeiro) O Clube foi criado para promover diálogos qualificados sobre a p…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.migalhas.com.br/depeso/461675/cnj-e-o-contencioso-judicial-de-cbs-ibs
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @frediedidier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 48,608 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@frediedidier named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Megafone do Processo Civil - Prof. Fredie Didier Jr.” (@frediedidier), 8,397 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frediedidier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.