Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Секретный канал по туалетному навыку

Channel

Секретный канал по туалетному навыку

@priychaem_k_gorshky

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

829subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965438559
TypeChannel
Username@priychaem_k_gorshky
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/priychaem_k_gorshky

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@priychaem_k_gorshky/1029 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC@aba_isakova/59823 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC1.0037 minutes
@priychaem_k_gorshky/1033 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC@aba_isakova/59895 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC1.00under a minute
@aba_isakova/59956 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC@priychaem_k_gorshky/1040 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC1.005 minutes
@aba_isakova/59966 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC@priychaem_k_gorshky/1041 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC1.005 minutes
@priychaem_k_gorshky/1045 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC@aba_isakova/60007 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC1.004 minutes
@priychaem_k_gorshky/1046 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC@aba_isakova/60017 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@aba_isakova9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.994 minutesthis entry (5–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @priychaem_k_gorshky — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

824829826.57 August 2026 — 828 subscribers7 August 2026 — 829 subscribers8 August 2026 — 829 subscribers15 August 2026 — 826 subscribers29 August 2026 — 824 subscribers7 September 2026 — 825 subscribers14 September 2026 — 829 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 823–830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 07:39829+4
7 Sept 2026, 07:39825+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:03824-2
15 Aug 2026, 19:04826-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:30829no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:52829+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:39828first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

В ситуации, как у этой мамы, я бы начала именно с освоения туалетного навыка. Это не просто вопрос бытового удобства. Это развитие осознания своего тела, саморегуляции, понимания происходящего и важный фундамент для дальнейшего обучения. При этом обязательно нужно разобраться: ✔ чувствует ли ребёнок позывы; ✔ нет ли медицинских причин, которые мешают освоению навыка. После этого уже можно проводить диагностику и вы…

7 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Не говорит... не понимает... на горшок — истерика...» Подобные сообщения мы получаем очень часто. Смотрите видео — в нем рассказываю, как я бы действовала в такой ситуации ⬇️

7 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026

👆 Знаете, почему наши методики работают? 1️⃣ Пошаговая система Самое ценное в освоении туалетного навыка – это система. Онлайн-тренинг - это система, которую Оксана Исакова создавала на протяжении 20 лет своей работы. Каждую неделю на нашей обучающей платформе вам открывается обучающий модуль с короткими видео-уроками и рекомендациями. Смотрите, внедряете в течении недели, делитесь результатом на обучающей платформе…

6 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026

⏰ Важное напоминание: через 2 часа стоимость участия в онлайн-тренинге “Приучаем к горшку” увеличится на 4990 рублей! Чтобы принять участие, переходите по ссылке https://clck.ru/3RzPeg и жмите кнопку ХОЧУ НА ТРЕНИНГ

6 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026

🌺 Почему на нашем тренинге получают такой результат за 8 недель? Комфортное прохождение тренинга без стресса для вас и вашего ребенка. Потому-что процесс приучения ребёнка к горшку требует времени, и его нельзя решить за несколько часов и пару дней. Даже у детей, у которых не наблюдаются нарушения развития, данный навык может формироваться от 7 до 30 дней. У детей с особенностями данный процесс занимает больше врем…

6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Если ребёнок идёт в туалет только тогда, когда его посадили, значит инициатива пока принадлежит взрослому, а не ребёнку. На курсе мы пошагово показываем, как: ✅ передать ответственность ребёнку; ✅ сформировать внутреннюю мотивацию; ✅ сделать так, чтобы ребёнку самому стало важно вовремя идти в туалет. Именно тогда появляется самостоятельность, а не бесконечные напоминания и уговоры. Если у вашего ребёнка похожая с…

6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Посадишь — сходит. Не посадишь — даже не вспомнит про туалет... Знакомая ситуация? Почему так происходит и что с этим делать — рассказала в видео ⬇️

6 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дочь днём ходит на унитаз в 100% и речь прогрессирует просто на космических скоростях. Реальный результат нашего онлайн-тренинга “Приучаем к горшку” . Почему при освоении туалетного навыка идет прогресс в речи - писала здесь https://t.me/priychaem_k_gorshky/824

6 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

💥Почему ребёнок устраивает истерики при виде горшка? Представьте: ваш ребёнок уверенно писает на горшок, вы уже вздохнули с облегчением, думая, что всё сложное позади. Но как только дело касается «по-большому», начинается совсем другая история. Он берёт подгузник и умоляющим взглядом просит надеть. Если вы отказываетесь, он терпит, капризничает, истерит, прячется. И это длится днями, а порой и годами. Горшок? Унит…

5 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026

Запись прямого эфира с Анной, где она более подробно рассказывает, как с помощью туалетного навыка запустить речь, смотрите по ссылке 👉 https://t.me/priychaem_k_gorshky/44

5 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

Как освоение туалетного навыка помогло запустить речь у неговорящего ребёнка Анна – мама Саши, до 2 лет не замечала, что с сыном что-то не так. Он реагировал на взрослых, был достаточно милым карапузом, даже сказал слово «абака» («собака», видимо, сильно испугался). Только в 3 года Анна заметила, что все идет не так, как должно. Ребёнок не говорит, ходит в туалет в штаны. По-маленькому родители научили ходить стоя,…

5 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026

Хочу поделиться вдохновляющей историей Анны и её сына Саши. Эта история о том, как одно решительное действие изменило жизнь мамы и её сына.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @priychaem_k_gorshky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Секретный канал по туалетному навыку” (@priychaem_k_gorshky), 829 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/priychaem_k_gorshky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.