The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Channel
Vaibhav Kajale, IAS 2022
@Vaibhav_Kajale_AIR_325
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,225subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001378033632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Vaibhav_Kajale_AIR_325 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Vaibhav_Kajale_AIR_325 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 4,225 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 4,228 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 4,240 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 4,243 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:48 | 4,253 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 4,256 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 4,257 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 4,257 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
167 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 79 | 47.3% | |
| ❤ | 77 | 46.1% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.19% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.599% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2023 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
WR-CSP-24-NameList-engl-190724.pdf
👍3
File, posted without a caption
👍4❤1
Some do get prelims phobia.It is natural to get so.But,as I mentioned earlier just command your brain that you have studied well and you will excel smoothly. No one can complete the syllabus 100% or say I am fully prepared. Finish your studis by evening and chill,have dinner early and have sleep of 8 hours,talk to your parents and take blessings from them and God.Be calm and confident as all 100 answers are in front…
❤30👍3🔥2
Do reverse engineering in Quant questions if you face difficulty with the given options and attempt all comprehension in 1 hour and then remaining time Quant and logical questions.The level of difficulty is basic and don't go any formula and all ,just do basic math and use common sense. Don't get lazy in 2nd half and think of 1st paper.Attempt sincerely as you have no option and you can't leave the hall before time😄…
❤11👍2
Do's and Don'ts for upcoming Prelims of 16th June: 1) GS 1) Stick to your own sources and do rapid revision and Don't go for anything new even if Upsc chairman suggests any material. 2) Do reverse planning now,like what you will study in morning just before exam and in afternoon break for whom CSAT is an issue.One day before and likewise. 3) In last 2-3 days just revise high probability topics and memory based ones…
❤15👍8👎1
Best of luck friends 👍💐
❤12🔥4
https://upsconline.nic.in/eadmitcard/index.php
Updated list of Channels: (In the order I received) AIR 22: https://t.me/anshulbhattias AIR 466 and AIR 1 (Odisha PCS) https://t.me/souravoas AIR 435: https://t.me/anushkakarnwal14 AIR 916: https://t.me/HindiwithNeelesh AIR 72: https://t.me/tanujpathak72 AIR 136: https://t.me/arpitkumar136 AIR 377: https://t.me/iamrrj1 AIR 378: https://t.me/ashasharma378 AIR 35: https://t.me/Abhinav_Jain35 AIR130: https://t…
👍9❤3👏1🔥1🕊1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤1
Congratulations to all who made it and best wishes to all the fighters who will be in the list next time 💐💐👍👍
👍7
File, posted without a caption
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Vaibhav_Kajale_AIR_325. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Abhinav_Jain35 · 5,5781 postAbhishek Dange AIR -452, UPSC CSE 2023
@abhishekdange452 · 2,1361 postAditya Srivastava AIR 1 UPSC CSE 2023
@aditya297ias · 33,5251 postRamesh Verma AIR-150
@air150rameshverma · 2,7711 postAnimesh Verma AIR 38 (EE optional)
@AnimeshVerma21 · 4,1351 postAnshul Bhatt AIR 22
@anshulbhattias · 13,6221 postAnshul Hindal IAS AIR 48 UPSC CSE 2023
@anshulhindalupscair48 · 4,0931 postAnushka Karnwal, IAS
@anushkakarnwal14 · 2,8201 postArpit kumar AIR 136
@arpitkumar136 · 16,8211 postHindi literature with Neelesh Ahirwar
@hindiwithneelesh · 1,0811 postRishabh Jain
@iamrrj1 · 7,7831 postPRASHANT BHOJANE IRS(C & IT) notes and strategy
@PRASHANTBHOJANE_AIR849 · 2,9461 postPriya Rani AIR 69
@priyarani_ias · 12,3841 postRishabh Dev (AIR 167, UPSC CSE 2023)
@rishabhdev23 · 1,8791 postRohit Tyagi AIR 74, CSE23
@rohittyagi26 · 6,2571 postSAURABH SHARMA (AIR-23, UPSC CSE 2023)
@saurabhsharma2208 · 12,9811 postShivansh Rathee AIR 63, Sociology optional
@shivanshrathee · 5,3911 postTANUJ PATHAK- AIR 72 CSE2023
@tanujpathak72 · 5,6251 postTejas, AIR 37 : Navigating the UPSC Labyrinth
@tjtalkss · 12,5601 postUPSC with Prem (AIR 130) & Sanjay (AIR 811)
@UPSCsimplifiedwithSP · 4,4321 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@civilstapias · 34,144
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
@manthaniq · 21,145
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 September 2026
@silencioAnnouncements · 55,708
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@NishanteAcademyofficial · 20,883
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vaibhav Kajale, IAS 2022” (@Vaibhav_Kajale_AIR_325), 4,225 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vaibhav_Kajale_AIR_325.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.