JR北:不是哥们

Channel
小摄影师的幻想罢了
@prepreview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
760subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001483085509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prepreview |
| Description | 主云相机与镜头,包括但不限于看图说话、无机硬云、入魔批判等,买了不少机身,不怎么讨论附件。 闲聊群:https://t.me/pre_pre_view 主笔是个开大车的MFA,虽然确乎是搞艺术的,但也略懂一些工程机械。 * 本频道有野生完熟芒果出没 * * 本频道也许会有意见不一情况出现,请根据个人口味取食相应观点 * |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prepreview |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 760 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 760 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 759 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.0%
- avg views ÷ 760 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 152
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,430 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,500
- Videos
- ≈109
- Links
- ≈480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
日本人不是没试图通过人工放生鱼苗之类的动作进行干预,但效果不显著,一年还是只能捞个四千来吨。 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8B%E3%82%B7%E3%83%B3
羽幌港简明渔业史。 总之北海道西岸地区曾经盛产鲱鱼,但出于至今没有明确结论的原因(海温变化和滥捕各执一词)在1910年以后产量严重下降,1957年羽幌更是只捞了199吨,直接毁灭了羽幌的捕鱼业。
可以看出,在大正和昭和年间,不论你家有没有钱,幼儿夭折还是个很常见的事情,光是这一家就没了三个 科学技术确实是第一生产力.jpg
此外路过了一个寺院的公墓。其中看到一家给自己老祖供了一瓶宝矿力,也不知他家明治年间老祖喝不喝得惯
继续北海道故事。 在回程路上从上羽幌方向绕了一圈,看了另一个装车的点。昔日这里曾有各种宿舍,工厂,设备…… 但如今一切已经复归山林
苹果甚至打了索尼两遍
iPod打完iPhone打
索半赢了,但是索尼没赢
一定是那苹果,它把索尼大哥打至跪地……
现在看来大家真是赚不到钱
只能发动pay to win技能了
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @prepreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 874,838 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小摄影师的幻想罢了” (@prepreview), 760 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prepreview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.