16 Jun 2022, 16:59 UTC≈6,850 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FoolishTraceWindPhoto
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
一碗脑脊液。
@wavechannel00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,680subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001360316486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wavechannel00 |
| Created | 20 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wavechannel00 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 1,680 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,679 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,681 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 1,682 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 May 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
10 Jun 2022, 16:54 UTC≈6,380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Since the day Telegram was launched almost 9 years ago, we've been giving our users more features and resources than any other messaging app. A free app as powerful as Telegram was revolutionary in 2013 and is still unprecedented in 2022. To this day, our limits on chats, media and file uploads are unrivaled. And yet, many have been asking us to raise the current limits even further, so we looked into ways to let yo…
8 Jun 2022, 23:48 UTC≈4,710 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BigXhead_AeroplanePhoto
在《Top Gun: Maverick》中出现的 Darkstar，是由 LOCKHEED MARTIN 团队设计的超音速验证机。 官网有壁纸下载！ https://lockheedmartin.com/topgun
7 Jun 2022, 13:43 UTC≈4,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
这个Beta看起来很不靠谱，官方源码这几天压根没有更新
6 Jun 2022, 18:45 UTC≈2,900 viewsread 7 August 2026
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
6 Jun 2022, 18:45 UTC≈2,980 viewsread 7 August 2026
我感觉这个功能就是在白白浪费 screen estate
6 Jun 2022, 18:44 UTC≈2,800 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
3 Jun 2022, 11:15 UTC≈2,900 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @prepreviewPhoto
原田先生是喜欢老风格而又在三巨头工作的唯一设计师。虽然设计的号称是当代最强镜头，可是经常又大又怪，似乎能从中看出某些220度鱼眼的影子来。他对人说话，总是满口3D HiFi，教人半懂不懂的。原田先生一出专利，所有键摄群里的人便都看着他笑，有的叫道，“原田先生，你又设计怪东西了！”他不回答，对KOL们说，“写两篇报道，出一个视频。” 便排出九文大钱。键摄们又故意的高声嚷道，“你一定又堆了假料了！” 原田先生便睁大眼睛说，“你怎么这样凭空污人清白……”“什么清白？我前天亲眼见你塞进四枚大尺寸ED，然后色散还要被人吊着打。”原田先生便涨红了脸，额上的青筋条条绽出，争辩道，“J-PSKH4 不能算 ED…… J-PSKH4！……尼康从来不标黄，能算ED么？”接连便是难懂的话，什么 “ 「具有尼克尔特性」的像差平衡有明确规定，但谋求像差平衡的方法却因设计师的不同而存在较大的差异“ ，什么 ”设计师必须在满足了「具有尼克尔特性」这一基础上才…
2 Jun 2022, 06:33 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cnphotog_collect
ARRI：你在我们的 35 上不需要做黑平衡，因为那个东西很烦人 RED：我觉得你在内涵我
1 Jun 2022, 15:19 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 7 August 2026
通告措辞成这样感觉挺严重，要么跑路要么结婚的这个地步 不过不管具体是结婚还是跑路哪一种我觉得都挺好的，双手双脚支持那种。
1 Jun 2022, 14:42 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
。？所以志崎女士到底发生了什么 我很迷惑
1 Jun 2022, 07:36 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 7 August 2026
做个人吧 放过老动画吧 别再折腾它们了
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wavechannel00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 955,177 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“一碗脑脊液。” (@wavechannel00), 1,680 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wavechannel00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.