Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Акулы пяра

@prakuly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

97subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002032768438
TypeChannel
Username@prakuly
DescriptionРекламный вандализм и коммуникационный абсурдизм Для связи: @Khaizerzavr
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/prakuly

Growth

977 August 2026 — 97 subscribers9 August 2026 — 97 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96–98 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:0297no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:3097first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
126
Videos
43
Links
53

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54224066823302980412114.6%
🔥2114.6%
custom 54225690879286619591913.2%
👍149.72%
custom 5255723571417719479128.33%
😁74.86%
custom 525570416675547513664.17%
🤔64.17%
custom 542242873269239403153.47%
custom 542253623572381324953.47%
custom 542285712991036836653.47%
custom 525380148765341327742.78%
custom 542031327232055474842.78%
🤡42.78%
custom 542267365320244908532.08%
21.39%
😈21.39%
🤯21.39%
custom 542044000821552423910.694%
custom 542272770107090375010.694%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 1 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
91.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
87.0
over 16 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
F7NfYUJCUneRHUk7TaeU18 July 20258 July 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 1 August 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2025, 07:02 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пиррова победа Никто не ждал, никто не верил, но мы чувствовали… Ромочка из Состава, видимо, снова поверил в себя. Да не просто так, а серьезно, по-взрослому. Решил побаловать нас и читателей очередной жирной авторской колонкой. Публику данный формат уже изрядно заебал. Как, полагаем, и самого Романенко… Но что ж поделать, коли толпе нужны клоуны, начальству пидерасты, а ты — всего лишь старый и лысый мужичок с те

15 Jul 2025, 07:45 UTC107 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Уж очень интересная Санта Барбара намечается Постмаркетинг выкатил вчера первую серию сериала "Как все наебнулось", только вместо Миши Козырева у них сразу два престарелых журналиста: Бордюг и Бевзенко. Нам очень понравился финальный вопрос от Бордюга: как вы оцениваете инфополе российской рекламы? Вам не скучно читать о происходящем на рынке? Ответить на вопрос вызвался Сергей Коптев из RoRe. Он заявил, что произ

custom 54225690879286619593custom 54224066823302980412custom 54225362357238132492custom 54204400082155242391custom 54228571299103683661

9 Jul 2025, 10:37 UTC116 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Красивый. Плохой. Злой. Вчера злой UnderПяр раскрыл секрет Полишинеля, связанный с сайтом издания Adindex, чей плохой дизайн и UX проигрывают красивому Sostav'у. Adindex, при всей своей роли как одного из ключевых медиа в сфере маркетинга, креатива и коммуникаций, до сих пор живёт на сайте из прошлой эпохи. Что есть, то есть. Но и возразить есть что: несмотря на захудалый сайт, коллеги из Адындекса умудряются справ

custom 54224066823302980415custom 54225690879286619595custom 54224287326923940313

8 Jul 2025, 10:37 UTC91 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Advertisementerid F7NfYUJCUneRHUk7TaeUPhoto

Давай разберем тобою написанное Может быть, помните, как в начале 2025 года индустриальные СМИ бомбили анонсами и обзорами на книжку Юрия Уляшева EMBA²? Так вот, мы не могли пройти мимо и приобрели данный манускрипт от мастодонта рекламной индустрии, выпускника Сколково и авангардного художника. И что же мы обнаружили на страницах этого шедевра корпоративного самовыражения? 1️⃣Рекламы больше, чем в любом новогодн

custom 54224066823302980416custom 54225690879286619593custom 54228571299103683663custom 54226736532024490851

7 Jul 2025, 18:13 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Интересно, что на это скажет Федосеев?😧 UPD. Публикация из канала Валерия пропала. Наверно, нам показалось. Но мы такие шутки не поддерживаем🫡

custom 54225690879286619594custom 54203132723205547482custom 54224066823302980412custom 54224287326923940312custom 54226736532024490851custom 54228571299103683661

5 Jul 2025, 14:55 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Смотрели недавнее интервью Sostav'а и думали: "Почему все так неистово хвалят ИИ?". Вроде сидят два здоровых мужика в парке развлечений. Одеты, правда, как детишки, которых мама собирала на день рождения к другу. Обсуждают с горящими глазами новые "ИИгрушки" и искренне радуются нейро-старушкам с носорогами... Евангелисты ИИ, никак иначе 🤦‍♂️ Понятно, что это Ромашка гордится своей придумкой и хочет ее тиражировать

custom 54224066823302980416custom 54225362357238132493custom 54203132723205547482custom 54227277010709037501

4 Jul 2025, 12:35 UTC87 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥6custom 52557235714177194793

4 Jul 2025, 12:34 UTC85 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Никто не просил, никто не ждал, а мы сделали. Держите, если надо. Кидайтесь везде, где хотите.

custom 52557235714177194794custom 54225690879286619593👍2🔥1custom 54226736532024490851

3 Jul 2025, 13:33 UTC82 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пока мы с редакцией ждём ваших невероятных историй в личке (не стесняйтесь), обратили внимание на ленту новостей состава в телеграм. На текущий момент в канале вышли: 1. Фараоны в рекламе Vaulted 2. Макдональдс 3. Симпсоны 4. Реклама проекта AdPass 5. Трипадвысер 6. Туту 7. Дональд Трамп 8. Реклама какого-то сериала о косметике 9. Кока-Кола Из девяти публикаций в самом классном и крутом tg-канале ведущего издания

🤡4👍3🤔3custom 52557041667554751361

2 Jul 2025, 10:37 UTC81 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤣Это не учебная тревога! Канал "Акулы Пяра" возвращается в эфир после длительного молчания. Мы набрались сил, подлечили кукуху и решили, что если уж начали срать желчью на представителей рыночка, то срать надо ВЕЧНО. Чтобы обыграть наше отсутствие и не скатываться в подобие индустриальных медиа и СМИ (которые нам неприятны), мы приняли решение о сезонности вещания. В прошлом, пилотном сезоне, мы старались собират

🔥8custom 52538014876534132773👍2😈2custom 54225690879286619591

5 Jun 2025, 09:02 UTC120 viewsread 9 August 2026

Особо заинтересованные уже готовы инвестировать в говно. Нам, чтобы публиковать пресс-релизы средней руки, новый стол не нужен, хватит репоста. Зачем платить больше? Мы открыты к предложениям, коллеги☺️

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @prakuly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Акулы пяра” (@prakuly), 97 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prakuly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.