Posted without readable text
👍3

Channel
@pppbp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,320subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003339055177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @pppbp @u333c |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pppbp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 4,320 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 4,320 | +11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 4,309 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 4,307 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 4,309 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 4,309 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 4,304 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,761 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
👍3
Posted without readable text
龍@longg 您已参与成功,请等待开奖通知! 抽奖🎁多多, 请加@bpppp 参加更多抽奖 ├活动类型: 通用抽奖 ├定时开奖: 2026-08-16 23:00:00 +0800 ├参与关键词: 欢迎👏参与抽奖,活动多多 ├强制关注频道(群组): 🔎東亚通@pppbp 🪶东信移民 ├已参与: 223 人 ├奖品列表: ├ 38 x 15 ├ 飞机✈️送⭐️⭐️✖️150 x 15 [如何参与?]在群组中回复关键词『欢迎👏参与抽奖,活动多多』参与活动。 发送『 /lottery 』或『 抽奖 』 查询当前群组的抽奖
Posted without readable text
#网友爆料:上面图片就是柬埔寨灿总团队的老板, 有人叫他李总,有人叫他文总;第二,缅甸护照就是康总,以前在大其力的时候叫杜总,杜万群;另外一个就是李总的表弟,叫阿森。 我也不一一去把你们的真实姓名、家庭地址发出来。我今天发在这里,希望你能看到。我的人现在还在四川宜宾看守所,叫你们拿5万U去保,你们也都不愿意出。还有盘口做了两年了,出了一亿五千万左右,给我八个点,通道费扣50%,汇率7.4。 你们一个个老板就是这样吃掉跟你们做事的人。我把你们当成老板,你们都是把我们这些人当傻逼。你们跑不掉的,我知道你们敢做这一行的也不怕,那我就看看你们挣的这么多钱有没有命花。 只是还没开始,一旦我开始弄你们的时候,一个月之内把你们三个缉拿归案。 给你们三天时间,不给我处理好,把我应该分到的钱还给我,我就全面曝光你,到你家里找你的父母、兄弟姐妹,到时候会很热闹。 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp
#网友曝光 此女来自泰国,以前在KK卖逼,现在人在柬埔寨西港卖毒,平时还专门搞这种骗点小钱的事情。 东南亚碰上这种事是真的很搞心态。 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp
2026-08-09日报 成交核实: • +888 0101 6699,5,051 TON(约 $6,866)成交。 • +888 0101 6427,5,555 TON(约 $7,561)成交。 今日4位成交: • @cops、@mods、@jbkj、@bmsw、@bmzs。 NFT 系列: • Plush Pepe: #2290 成交价 13,919 TON。 • Plush Pepe:#1588 成交价 8,888 TON。 • Plush Pepe:#934 成交价 8,500 TON。 • Plush Pepe:#2626 成交价 6,800 TON。 • Plush Pepe:#2705 成交价 6,833 TON。 • Plush Pepe:#1507 成交价 5,388 TON。 群内大事件: @shaoye 低价出售+888号码,多人付款后未收到号码 8月9日晚,多名用户称向技术开发者“少爷”@sha…
#小姐姐爆料:曝光此男(在特区叫 66,真实姓名:林武平)。请各位姐妹避雷,遇见这种男的有多远跑多远,简直垃圾一个。 我与此男于 2023 年 8 月认识,差不多 10 月左右在一起。当时本人在缅甸,此男在特区。后来本人一直在缅甸工作,前期聊天时他经常不回信息,有时候甚至一两个星期才回几句。后来本人去柬埔寨奥斯曼工作,当时这个杂种各种洗脑,还跟朋友吹牛皮,说我工作的钱、发的工资全部存到他那里。当时这个杂种还在特区,那么我请问,我辛辛苦苦赚的钱为什么要存到你那里呢?还有你在特区没钱,却问我要钱去包厢。我身上只剩 5500 人民币,二话不说给你转了 5000 人民币过去供你玩包厢。跟你在一起那么久,动不动给我画饼。我也是个傻逼,恋爱脑上头信你这个杂种画的饼。后面你这个杂种说要过来柬埔寨,正好当时奥斯曼打仗,我回到了拜林。你说你们也要过来拜林,结果你这个穷酸鬼,草泥马,刚开始吃我的、喝我的、住我的。我承认我也是个傻逼,恋爱脑上头,心…
#群友投稿:该起案情发生在8月8日。想着这好日子约我的好兄弟出来喝两杯开心一下,后面就发生了我们今天的主题——越南大逃亡。 我的朋友“小b”他说,几个大老爷们喝酒有点无趣,想着找妹妹过来一起喝,就打开了微信附近的人,加了一个妹纸。后面事先谈好了,如果照片不是本人就可以不需要,让她过来。 到达小区楼下,我和小b去接她。妹纸带个口罩,看不到真容。小b觉得这妹纸是人妖就不敢,很正常,18岁的小少男。后面谈不和,妹纸找小b索要过来的车费,也就四分钟的路程,要我们120w越南盾。 我操嘞个,小手都没摸,小屁股都没拍,就找我们要120w。小b有点生气,准备走人,那个女的就抓着小b的衣服不让小b走。 我本人“小帅(东南亚第一深情)”跑了,后面小b被卡在那里。我想着不能让小b一个人这样,我就折返回去解救小b。 后面我和小b都跑掉了,谁知道窜出来一个车手,他们是一伙的。我跑路的过程就不多说了,那女的也是飞快(穿高跟鞋),跑着跑着摔倒了。…
#泰国新闻 泰国严查“假出生登记”乱象:涉中国家庭入籍案曝光,1483份记录被疑异常 泰国近期曝出一起涉及虚假出生登记及非法取得国籍的案件,引发社会对国家安全、洗钱以及外国人非法获取泰国身份等问题的关注。 据泰国有关部门调查,一起涉嫌由中国籍人员参与的诈骗及洗钱网络案件牵出大量异常出生登记记录。目前,已有1483份出生登记资料被列为疑似存在违规情况,相关部门正进一步核查。 警方调查发现,部分中国家庭疑似通过购买所谓的“生育服务”,安排泰国男子冒充孩子的生父进行出生登记。涉事泰国男子据称每起可获得2000至1.5万泰铢不等的报酬。通过这种方式,相关儿童可能获得泰国出生登记身份,并进一步申请取得泰国国籍。 今年7月,警方针对案件签发35份逮捕令,并已拘捕32名涉案人员,其中包括14名泰国男子、11名中国籍母亲、5名中国籍父亲以及2名相关官员。 目前,曼谷方面已经启动行政程序,准备撤销24份被认定存在问题的出生证明以及相关国…
波贝今天再抓23人,警方还发现不少货! 今天,柬埔寨卜迭棉芷省副省长普拉克波利率联合工作组,对波贝市10处地点展开突击检查,共查获23名外国人(含1女),并查封2处涉案窝点。 检查中,警方在部分窝点缴获3支短枪、毒品,以及大量手机、电脑等电诈工具。 目前,涉案的中国台湾及马来西亚籍人员已移交宪兵部门,17名无证及涉毒中国籍人员移交市警察局处理,2名证件齐全者获准留居。 目前,两处涉嫌网赌电诈及毒品的窝点已被依法封停。 做美盘的啊,FBI的装备挺全乎~~ 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pppbp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 24,602 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔎東亚通@pppbp” (@pppbp), 4,320 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pppbp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.