Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🇱🇦老挝大事件👉東亚通

@dyt_03

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003788266838
TypeChannel
Username@dyt_03
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dyt_03

Growth

203204203.59 Aug 2026, 16:15 — 204 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:28 — 203 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 16:1510 Aug 2026, 02:28
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:28203-1
9 Aug 2026, 16:15204first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.9
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held8 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total631
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#小姐姐爆料:曝光此男(在特区叫 66,真实姓名:林武平)。请各位姐妹避雷,遇见这种男的有多远跑多远,简直垃圾一个。 我与此男于 2023 年 8 月认识,差不多 10 月左右在一起。当时本人在缅甸,此男在特区。后来本人一直在缅甸工作,前期聊天时他经常不回信息,有时候甚至一两个星期才回几句。后来本人去柬埔寨奥斯曼工作,当时这个杂种各种洗脑,还跟朋友吹牛皮,说我工作的钱、发的工资全部存到他那里。当时这个杂种还在特区,那么我请问,我辛辛苦苦赚的钱为什么要存到你那里呢?还有你在特区没钱,却问我要钱去包厢。我身上只剩 5500 人民币,二话不说给你转了 5000 人民币过去供你玩包厢。跟你在一起那么久,动不动给我画饼。我也是个傻逼,恋爱脑上头信你这个杂种画的饼。后面你这个杂种说要过来柬埔寨,正好当时奥斯曼打仗,我回到了拜林。你说你们也要过来拜林,结果你这个穷酸鬼,草泥马,刚开始吃我的、喝我的、住我的。我承认我也是个傻逼,恋爱脑上头,心

9 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:金三角特外菜市场附近,刚刚已经有公司收到消息开始搬家撤离了,一整车的人全部溜走了 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

8 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC241 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

你好,曝光金三角特外金鑫宾馆和福建宾馆是一个老板.老板开了一辆湘E牌白色越野车.尾号P62老板和老挝警察合伙搞中国人.早上8点被老挝警察堵房间,罚款1.5万.直冲我们房间来,隔壁住的都没事.请大家避雷. 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:老挝万象塔銮经济特区前面被围堵,目前警方陆陆续续的在收尾了,各位兄弟们再坚持一下啊,小区大门已封锁外面进不来里面出不去。 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

8 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:给昨天特区万国大检查,不是为了抓推推。 主要原因是楼里有一个老挝妹抽烟抽死在床上了,现在人已经由治安局带到殡仪馆,奉劝各位推推,在东南亚赚赚钱就行了,du这个东西还是不要碰,年纪轻轻划不来,可惜了这么位妙龄女子!!! 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

8 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#老挝新闻 8月8日,老挝公安部专项行动组在万象碧塔銮经济区(Bung That Luang Economic Zone)开展打击网络诈骗行动。 据老挝方面通报,执法人员当天进入该经济区内11号楼和12号楼进行搜查,抓捕了一批从事电信诈骗及网络赌博活动的人员。 行动期间,警方同时查获多项涉案物品,目前具体缴获数量、涉案人员身份以及案件规模等详细信息,相关部门将在后续进一步公布。 随着老挝加强对诈骗团伙及相关活动场所的排查,万象等重点区域也成为执法部门重点清查对象。 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

8 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC320 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#网友反馈 刚开车经过特外东鹏一带,看到现场又来了不少警察,正在逐户排查。 路上的车辆也会被拦下检查,连车辆证件都要核对,现在基本查得很细。 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

8 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC3 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#最新消息:老挝万象塔銮湖特区一做国盘的公司被抓了100多号中国人。 关注大事件频道➡️ @pppbp @bpppp

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @dyt_03. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 245,916 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇱🇦老挝大事件👉東亚通” (@dyt_03), 203 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dyt_03.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.