Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel
Materi @petaloure
@ppetaloure
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003068910136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppetaloure |
| Description | @petaloure |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppetaloure |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7166.7%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 287
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 May 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,580 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 31s
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🗣️ : gimana sih cak karanya biar akun kita cantik? 👤 : mpung, kampung. Caranya ya JAJAN DI @petaloure LAAHHH! 🥁🥁 kalo lu masih ragu nyari store proofneeds yang beneran GACOORR, @petaloure udah ga perlu diragukan lagi. store dengan kinerja cepet, trusted, ga drama, hasilnya cakep terus. bukan kaleng-kaleng, bukan tipu-tipu. semua result cantiknya numpuk di @coscly LANGSUNG CHECK! 🥁🥁 honest review-nya juga hidup kayak…
kiss concrete nights, @petaloure curates proofneeds with a signature quietly unmistakable. 🌯♥ ⋆.˚ each result is rendered with refined pretty, soft, cool, and effortlessly attractive. no noise, no excess only outcomes that speak in soft confidence. for result receipts, wander through the @coscly, where every work rests like a gallery piece beneath. for unfiltered voices and candid impressions, the t.me/coscly/23 sta…
Sticker, posted without a caption
duh gimana yaa~ tiap hari kalian masih bingung mau order kemana? susah banget nyari yang resultnya bagus? mending order di @petaloure udah dibilangin berkali kali disini hasil editannya mantep banget coy 🔥🔥 ngerasa ragu juga? coba ayo intip resultnya dulu, dijamin langsung jatuh cinta pandangan pertama 😭☝🏻
masih nyari tempat order yang hasilnya bikin puas? ya ampun kalian tuh hobi banget nyari sesuatu yang sebenernya udah ada di depan mata 😭 ayo checkk @petaloure WOIPP 🫵🏻🔥 coba kepoin resultnya satu satu kalau masih nggak percaya. awas aja habis liat malah kalap terus mendadak pengen order semuanya ✌🏻
kalian masih muter-muter nyari tempat jualan all profneeds yang pas? daripada kelamaan mikir mending langsung cus liat ke @petaloure aja, pricelistnya juga terjangkau. bisa dicheck dulu harga mulai dari 2.500! jikalau mau custom enak untuk diajak diskusi juga dan nggak bikin kalian bingung sendirian. tinggal bilang maunya gimana 😆❤️🔥
pengen order tapi request kalian agak beda dari yang lain? HEI jangan langsung nyerah 😭 di @petaloure bisa open custom model yang agak lain juga kalii 🔥 tinggal tanyain dan jelasin maunya apa, siapa tau bisa diwujudin sesuai request kalian. enak banget kan daripada maksa sesuatu yang sebenernya nggak sesuai selera? ~CIHUUY bisa sekalian check result kami dulu yuk ✌🏻
peringatan keras ⚠️ jangan buka result @petaloure kalau kalian gampang keracunan. aku udah bilang dari awal ya 😭 soalnya niat awal cuma “lihat-lihat dulu” biasanya punya potensi berubah jadi “min, ini bisa custom gak ya?” dalam hitungan menit. kalau akhirnya order yaa itu urusan kalian sama dompet kalian yaa 🫵🏻🔥
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ XI’ —Midnight.. (𝘋𝘌𝘈𝘋 𝘞𝘏𝘌𝘈𝘛𝘌𝘙.) 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴: ⚰️ .صَمْت@ The Sõuthern? Swallowed ‘2Hollow .Feverish’ / +𝘏𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵 ..Cabinetes Preacher طَوِيلٌ Tightly a.) Rēgulation b.) Catalogue c.) Pricelist d.) Ordered Bot e.) Testimonial \ …
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌸 LIST MATERI & REPLY @PETALOURE. ♥️ ♡ PINNED (01) https://t.me/ppetaloure/2 https://t.me/ppetaloure/12 https://t.me/ppetaloure/10 ♡ REPLY (01) https://t.me/ppetaloure/14 https://t.me/ppetaloure/16 https://t.me/ppetaloure/21 https://t.me/ppetaloure/22 ♡ MATERI (02) https://t.me/ppetaloure/27 ♡ REPLY (02) https://t.me/ppetaloure/28 https://t.me/ppetaloure/29 https://t.me/ppetaloure/30 https://t.me/ppetaloure/31 http…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ppetaloure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 789,432 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Materi @petaloure” (@ppetaloure), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppetaloure.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.