Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PCM | Повод быть счастливым

@povodvideo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

518subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720027546
TypeChannel
Username@povodvideo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/povodvideo

Growth

5125185156 August 2026 — 512 subscribers7 August 2026 — 512 subscribers14 August 2026 — 518 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 511–519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:18518+6
7 Aug 2026, 20:17512no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:31512first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 518 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,106
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2626.8%
2424.7%
🎉1313.4%
👍1212.4%
🐳1010.3%
🥰66.19%
😱33.09%
11.03%
11.03%
💯11.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Иной день недели стоит!

🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, «Солярис» сам меня нашёл. Только не фильм, а книга. Иногда пространство работает каким-то удивительным образом (или вселенная, Бог, Целое - подчеркните то как это лежит у вас). На прошлой неделе Станислав Лем сам и/или его «Солярис» прилетела ко мне сразу несколькими каналами: о ней рассказали два совершенно не связанных между собой человека из, казалось бы, разных вселенных, где-то между этими встречами

1

3 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ломая рамки и стереотипы. А как играет Брюс!!! 😂😂😂

1

3 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC120 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сначала не докатилось. А потом — как докатилось… Я тут (с большим трудом) перестал слушать своего внутреннего цензора, знаете, это когда есть импульс встретиться с человеком, но у вас настолько поверхностное знакомство, что внутренний родитель тут же затыкает внутреннего ребёнка и говорит: А что подумают люди? Короче, тьфу на этого родителя, буду учиться в своих детей непосредственности в этой части. После того ка

4👍3

31 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC158 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Атаки по WB в первую очедедь бьют по тысячам людей, которые вовлечены в этот процесс - продавцы, курьеры, водители, сотрудники пунтов выдачи. И я хочу поделиться своей идеей, возможно, это найдет отклик у кого-то из читающих этот пост. я буду заказывать что-то на ВБ, смещая пусть немного заказы в их сторону, чтобы люди, вовлеченные в этот товарооборот, не оказались свосем без работы.

9

31 Jul 2026, 04:54 UTC161 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну итак все понятно… Вы отправляете руководителю новую идею и получаете ответ: «Посмотрим». Если вы ожидаете поддержки, это звучит как возможность, если ждёте отказа — как вежливое «нет». Ответ один и тот же, но восприятие добавило контекст из ожидания. Исследования говорят, что мозг не просто получает информацию извне, не воспринимает с нуля данные, он прогнозирует события и факты, а затем сравнивает свой прогноз

1

30 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Оно играет с тобой! А ты веришь Замечали странную вещь? Стоит купить новый автомобиль и кажется, что эти машины стали чаще попадаться. Просто в восприятии появился значимый параметр и немного изменилось ваше внимание. Похоже, мы видим гораздо меньше, чем нам кажется Каждую секунду органы чувств получают огромное количество информации: люди, вещи, запахи, звуки… Если бы мозг пытался одинаково подробно обработать вс

👍2

28 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC138 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Митин ДР с пузырями, бургерами и друзьями!

🎉6

28 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему самосаботаж может быть выгоден психике? Перед запуском проекта кто-то спрашивает: - Ну что, получится? А внутри возникает желание ответить: Посмотрим. Не хочу загадывать. Как пойдет. В спорте вообще существует целый набор подобных "примет". Не рассказывать о цели, не произносить желаемое время на дистанции, не говорить заранее, что рассчитываешь победить. Конечно, иногда это просто суеверие или способ не соз

1💯1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Да мне просто повезло! Так могут выглядеть мысли, когда я справился с задачей или наоборот - достаточно одной ошибки и: ну вот, так и знал, что не справлюсь. Выглядит как обесценивание себя. Если начать считать, то может оказаться, что десять фактов мозг проигнорировал, а один сделал тяжелым, весомым и заметным. Знакомо? Давайте разбираться почему. В прошлом выпуске мы говорили о DMN (Default Mode Network) — сети

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @povodvideo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 798,969 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PCM | Повод быть счастливым” (@povodvideo), 518 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/povodvideo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.