переходимммм

Channel
ПЕРЕЕЗД | 𝑷𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒐 𝑫𝒐𝒍𝒍’’
@port_pom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003031336288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @port_pom |
| Description | отзывы — @otz_KSmayori юз — @KSmayori ид — 1974994656 ‼️ЗА ФЕЙКОВ НЕ РУЧАЮСЬ‼️ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/port_pom |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 38
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
181 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449698107119904829 | 36 | 19.9% | |
| custom 5199650999546952205 | 34 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5199412938099666948 | 23 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5456309534962234647 | 23 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5413540173319252668 | 22 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5391090636961099009 | 20 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5202202712631944524 | 12 | 6.63% | |
| custom 5413341178894493509 | 11 | 6.08% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 20 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll
агаааа за день подписалось только 10 вот так вы за мной следите да
https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll
союзы тоже ищу
ПЕРЕЕЗД | 𝑷𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒐 𝑫𝒐𝒍𝒍’’ pinned «снова https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll»
снова https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll https://t.me/portDoll
Channel name was changed to «ПЕРЕЕЗД | 𝑷𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒐 𝑫𝒐𝒍𝒍’’»
точно хотите переезд
я сделаю скоро переезд, ждите
возьму много заказов до этого месяца. количество не ограниченно прайс 230+ положительных отзывов лс: @KSmayori
𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬➕ 😃 𐐆ᏗᎶ: #комбо — ρяιѕє: 140₽ 🍸 ɖɖ: ~2-3часа 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢: @KSmayori ƈὄммἔᾗҭ : заказ, 30 реакций и я выхожу с реста
custom 54496981071199048299custom 54135401733192526688custom 54563095349622346477custom 51996509995469522053custom 51994129380996669481custom 52022027126319445241custom 53910906369610990091custom 54133411788944935091
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @port_pom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 537,441 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@PortDoll · 1133 posts.
@Anime_Nedofan · 41 postПЕРЕЕЗД||ᑭOᖇTᖴOᒪIO ᗪOᒪᒪ`^3^’
@Arxiv_Doll · 201 postАрхив Юин порт
@ARXIV_YUIN · 41 post[Закрыто]GojoSatoru/дкм
@Gojo_Satoru20318 · 1611 postРЕСТ ⊹ : ХАНИ 𝄞 𝆹𝅥 ݁ ᚐ ♩ #Dkm
@Hani_Dkm · 171 post𝓛'ᴏᴛᴛᴇ𝚜 ᵖᵒʳᵗ-ᶫᶦᵒ'
@lottassport · 481 postзакрыто||ᴘᴏʀᴛꜰᴏʟɪᴏ ᴅᴏʟʟ.’’⚠️
@Port_Doll · 111 postАРХИВ’’
@primers_KSmayori · 181 postangel.
@ReO_com · 231 post[ЧИСТКА СОЮЗОВ]reviews from tingyun
@reviews_from_tingyun · 2081 post( 89 ) E X E PORT
@SparkleMoon1 · 2171 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 11
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 11
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@port_pom named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД | 𝑷𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒐 𝑫𝒐𝒍𝒍’’” (@port_pom), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/port_pom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.