Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

( 89 ) E X E PORT

@SparkleMoon1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

217subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002457117839
TypeChannel
Username@SparkleMoon1
DescriptionДкм, жкм статус заказов: открыт фанат? ставь в ник #Ex1 Заключить союз, заказать работу, прислать новости- @sparkleMoonAnon_bot / @shuichi_0
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SparkleMoon1

Growth

2177 Aug 2026, 16:57 — 217 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:46 — 217 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:578 Aug 2026, 10:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:46217no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:57217first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 217 subscribers
Avg views / post
149
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,643
Reactions total378
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
306
Videos
10
Links
265

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

715 reactions across 15 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.27% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5321103608001880887527.27%
custom 5321361052636572132506.99%
custom 5326029634842687131506.99%
custom 5325509114871181479476.57%
custom 5217472438060742666436.01%
custom 5325998672423450369415.73%
custom 5323733094354675524324.48%
custom 5321456014363486748273.78%
custom 5326004225816159386253.50%
custom 5314800266753636472233.22%
custom 5314399619319362323223.08%
custom 5323810863327508687223.08%
custom 5325539368620814754223.08%
custom 5325579466435488356212.94%
custom 5314647494766914933202.80%
custom 5323360359912865397202.80%
custom 5325784783052104079192.66%
custom 5321224605820543819182.52%
custom 5321515834667985444182.52%
custom 5323711069762381423182.52%
11 further kinds12517.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 715reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
120
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
69
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SparkleMoon1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC41 views33 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟⭐️🎀❤️𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪💎🥹 🏛️ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟 🥹EXE 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 🥹🥹🩶🥹🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🥹#new b a n n e r ⚡ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟🥹🌟🥹🌟🎁🥹🌟🎁🥹

👾12custom 542726201830437760811custom 542943098967375776110

6 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Layer_helpPhoto

🌟🌟ֺ 𝅄 ִ ♟ 𝐋̈𝆬𝖺ִֺ𝗒𝖾᳕𝗋 𝐇ִֺ𝖾𝗅ꥍ̈𝗉 🤩🤩🧪ֺ 𝅄 ִ ֺ 🎂—。 :・ⳅ֗𝐚֔ⲏִֺ𝐮ⲙֺ͙ᥲָ࣪𝐞֖֗ɯьִֺ𝐜я֔ ⲇ𝐮ⳅֺᥲ⁠⁠⁠ύֺⲏ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠𝐨ⲙ, ⲏִֺ𐔖 ⲏ𐔤͙ꯪⲿ⁠⁠⁠ⲏ⁠⁠⁠⁠ы⁠⁠⁠ִֺⲭ ⲙ𝐚ⲧᥱִֺ𝐩֖υִᥲ፝᥈ִ𝐨ⲃ ⲏ⁠⁠⁠ᥱִֺⲧֺ𝐲🤩 🎀 🌸 ⲇֺ𝐨ִ͊ⳝִρֺ𝐨 ᥒ𝐨ִִⲿֺᥲ⁠⁠⁠⁠ִ᥈ֺ𝐨ֺֺⲃִֺ𝐚꯭ִⲧьֺ ⲃ 𝐋̈𝆬𝖺ִֺ𝗒𝖾᳕𝗋 𝐇ִֺ𝖾𝗅ꥍ̈𝗉 🍬🌸 ꕀ_ⳅ֔ⲇ𝐞֖ᥴִь ⲧы ⲙ𝐨ִֺⲿ𝐞ִֺɯь ⲏִ𝐚ֺύⲧִυֺ ᥈ֺֺюִֺⳝֺ𝐨ִύ ⲙ𝐚ⲧִֺᥱֺρ𝐮ִֺᥲִ᥈ ⲏ𝐚 ᥴֺⲃִ𝐨ύֺ ⲃֺⲕִ𝐲ֺᥴ υ ц֗ⲃֺ𝐞ִֺⲧ ⲇ͙᥈֔я ᥴ֖ⲃ𝐨̈ᥱ͙֔ύ ρ𝐚ֺⳝִ𝐨ֺⲧ⁠⁠⁠ыִֺ!🤩🤩 🌟🌟 🍼 ֺ 𝅄 ִ ⏜‌︵‌ֺ︵ִ⃞ ⎯ּ︭ 𓐠 ִ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟ֺ ִ 🎁𝐒ִ֔𝐔ִֺ𝐁⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠𝐒ֺ֢𝐂⁠⁠⁠𝐑⁠⁠⁠⃝𝐈ִֺ𝐁ִֺ𝐄ָ࣪ 🤩🌟ֺ

5 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @firatindstikersPhoto

ㅤㅤㅤׄ◟𓏴꯭⃔‌⃪⃪𓏴 ݁ 𝙉𝘦𝙒 𝘜𝙉𝘪𝘰𝙉 𝆹࣪𓏵𐇽᪶࿔ @firatindstikers︶‌⏝𓏏‌𓏏‌ @SparkleMoon1 ㅤㅤ ᷼︵︵𝙉𝘦𝙒 𝘜𝙉𝘪𝘰𝙉 ݁ ⑅ׅ֘𔘓 Семейный союз ⤹ㅤ ‌♡゙‌ㅤ @firatindstikers ㅤㅤ ᷼︵︵ ݁ㅤㅤ⳰⳱ #unions

4 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026

ЕБАТЬ ЧЕ @sexlease СПАСИБО ЗА ЗВЕЗДЫ ОГРОМНОЕ

2 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC93 views43 reactions35 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟⭐️🎀🎁𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪🤩🥹 🏛️ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟 🥹EXE 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 🥹🥹🩶🥹🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🥹#new b a n n e r 🎁 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟🥹👄🌟🥹🌟✔️🥹🌟⚠️🥹

custom 542939694346800664915custom 542934966446801115014custom 542938225467985123914

30 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC142 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

кстати ребята я забыл сообщить что поменял псевдоним, теперь я мито🤩

custom 53214560143634867486

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC173 views57 reactions69 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟⭐️🎀𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪🎁 🥹 🏛️ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟 🥹𝗦𝗞𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 🥹🥹🩶🥹🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🥹#new b a n n e r 🎁 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟🥹🎁🌟🥹🌟📍🥹🌟🎩🥹

custom 532145601436348674821custom 532122460582054381918custom 532371106976238142318

28 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC149 views54 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟⭐️🎀𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪 🎁 🏛️ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟 🥹𝗦𝗞𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 🥹🥹🩶🥹🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🥹#new b a n n e r 🧪 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟🥹🌙🌟🥹🌟🎁🥹🌟🎁🥹🥹

custom 532578478305210407919custom 521747243806074266618custom 542477314918086043817

23 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC212 views69 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟⭐️🎀𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪 🏛️ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟➿ 🥹𝗦𝗞𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 🥹🥹🩶🥹🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🥹#new b a n n e r ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🌟🥹🌟🥹🌟🥹🌟🥹🥹

custom 521747243806074266625custom 532381086332750868722custom 532553936862081475422

18 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC332 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️➿𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖶𝖮𝖱𝖪 ❤️🥹🥹🥹 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🥹𝗦𝗞𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 🥹🥹🩶🥹 🥹 #new b a n n e r🌟🌟🌟 🔤 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── 🌟🌟🎁🥹🌟🥹🌟🥹🌟🥹 🍭🥹

custom 531480026675363647223custom 531439961931936232322custom 531464749476691493320

14 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC359 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ🌟ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ#new ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤB A N N E R🎁 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤprice 🤩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 ❗ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤanon. me. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ( 89 ) & batlle! 🎁 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝖢𝖤𝖫𝖤𝖲𝖳𝖨𝖠𝖫 PORT ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ я проиграл ок

custom 532136105263657213217custom 532110360800188088716custom 532373309435467552414custom 53278164099573040574

5 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC398 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ🌟ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ #new ㅤㅤ🌟🎁 B A N N E R X5 + A V S🕯 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤprice 𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤanon. me. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ( 450r ) & 🍼 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ─────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝖢𝖤𝖫𝖤𝖲𝖳𝖨𝖠𝖫 PORT🍼

custom 532373309435467552418custom 532110360800188088715custom 532136105263657213214

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SparkleMoon1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 789,697 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“( 89 ) E X E PORT” (@SparkleMoon1), 217 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SparkleMoon1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.