Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pop’s Daily Dose of 班

@popdailydose

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

543subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380593481
TypeChannel
Username@popdailydose
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/popdailydose

Growth

540543541.57 Aug 2026, 23:03 — 540 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:48 — 540 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:38 — 543 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:038 Aug 2026, 13:38
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 540–543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:38543+3
8 Aug 2026, 03:48540no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:03540first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 543 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.9
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,462
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 https://arcprize.org/results/deepseek-v4-flash-0731

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC45 viewsread 8 August 2026

2026 年了还不支持显示图片

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026

我非常喜欢使用人工智能。每天早上,我都打开威艾斯-代码,启动微软副驾驶员。我还可以运行奇米代码,来尝试和国内最先进的大模型奇米-三聊天和完成工作。大模型们输出的词元都很聪明,还有的大模型可以生成图片!所以我觉得词元这个词汇未免有些狭隘,我提议不如干脆叫它新智元。当运行重复性工作时,廉价的深度求索-威四-闪电就能大展身手。我看着智能体们工作,喝一口凉白开,很难想象世界已经变化了这么大。这一切都源于几年前,聊天-生成式预训练变换器出现的那一刻

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://aosc.io/aoscc/2026-guide 草

👍3

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026

下面让我走左边 上面让我走右边

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

高德这个导航在左右脑互搏

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

7 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

昨天回家的时候拿 fold8 拍的

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

6 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/ID-K64Jk6JM 辣个男人他更新了

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC194 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

大家好,我们是 Kong 中国工程团队。作为全球领先的云原生 API 基础设施和开源网关生态,过去 4 年我们一直在中国默默耕耘并稳步壮大我们的 R&D 力量。 如果你对 网关 / 高并发 / 网络 / Rust /Lua/ 云原生 / AI Infra / 开发者工具 感兴趣,可以聊聊。 v2ex 链接 投递链接

Signed Pop 阿巴 阿巴

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @popdailydose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 265,941 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pop’s Daily Dose of 班” (@popdailydose), 543 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popdailydose.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.