Как вы относитесь к совместным чтениям?
- Обожаю!25%
- Не особо участвую, но можно попробовать17%
- Что это?50%
- Не поддерживаю8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@polina_vinnik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
181subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001735596391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polina_vinnik |
| Description | Приветствую на канале 😎 Готов обсуждать творчество, КНИГИ, новеллы и многое другое? Тогда тебе ко мне! Присоединяйся к обществу душнилок) у нас весело и немного душно 😏 А еще я писатель Хыхы 😎 моя дебютная книга #ВПогонеЗаМестью вышла в ЭКСМО! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polina_vinnik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 181 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 181 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 889 |
| Reactions total | 163 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
163 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5190949644913378198 | 60 | 36.8% | |
| custom 5190824601235506927 | 41 | 25.2% | |
| custom 5361721620526296161 | 21 | 12.9% | |
| custom 5364213981458230047 | 16 | 9.82% | |
| custom 5472119270924122519 | 14 | 8.59% | |
| custom 5472348622177730927 | 9 | 5.52% | |
| custom 5415998870297525938 | 2 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как вы относитесь к совместным чтениям?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Начало, середина, финал… Ну что я могу сказать, точнее сказать могут мои тренеры: «Вы точно раньше не стреляли, точно у вас сегодня второе занятие?» 😊 С 8 метров и такой результат, считаю, что я крутышка 🙏 А еще пытались разгадать загадку: как бы мы не меняли прицел, стрелы все равно летели в одну зону друг к другу 😂 Один из приколов: я отставляю мизинчик «как леди» (а так незя, влияет на траекторию) 😂 #Polina_l
custom 51909496449133781985custom 51908246012355069274custom 53642139814582300474
Итак, душнилки! Тайна раскрыта... Вашей душниле провели диагностику на тип личности! И выяснилось, что я Шизоид + Паранойял 🤩 Живите теперь с этим 🤩 #Polina_life
custom 53642139814582300476custom 51908246012355069273custom 51909496449133781982
Меня довели до слез... Как можно понять, что твоя работа выполнена на 100% круто и цепляюще? Легко, коллеги из других структур КОПИРУЮТ из разряда "списывай, но не точь-в-точь" 💻 ХАХАХАХАХАХХАХА Предыстория: мы с коллегой завели в принципе популярную рубрику с итогами месяца. Оформление, стиль подачи сделали чисто нашу, чтобы выделиться. И что вы думаете? Открываем сегодня соцсети, а в ленте наши коллеги из другой …
custom 51908246012355069275custom 53642139814582300473custom 51909496449133781982
Стало так тепло на душе🥰 спасибо, Влада 🥰
custom 51908246012355069279custom 51909496449133781986custom 53617216205262961614
🖤🖤🖤🈷️🈷️🈷️🈷️🖤🖤🖤 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅱️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Больше двух лет назад на мою первую книжную презентацию пришла замечательная девушка по имени Полина (псевдоним: Кира Рус). Она задала мне вопрос о том, как не опустить руки и продолжить стремиться к мечте стать издаваемой писательницей, если страшно получить отказ, страшно получить в ответ только молчание и остаться вообще без откл…
custom 519094964491337819811custom 51908246012355069276custom 53617216205262961616
Долгожданный выходной омрачился нежданной мигренью 😭 #Polina_life
custom 54723486221777309279custom 53617216205262961613
Не так давно нашей областной библиотеке исполнилось 128 лет! Мы, библиотекари, маркетилоги, it-специалисты и многие другие, поздравили нашу бибку с ДР необычным способом 🥰 я танцевать так и не научилось, но это мне не помешало 🥰 Ставьте реакции, когда заметите вашу душнилку 🥰 #Polina_life
custom 51909496449133781988custom 51908246012355069273custom 53642139814582300473
Ой ну как волнительнооо🥰 Полина отправила посылочку, а в ней ЕЁ КНИГА. Я сейчас на детской площадке сижу, щупаю, нюхаю её и офигеваю — это реальность🥺 А внутри еще и послание от руки, и мои картинки с героями! Это так приятно, удивительно и странно одновременно ахах🥹 Спасибо за доверие, дорогая❤️ Дальше — больше!
custom 51909496449133781984custom 53617216205262961614custom 54159988702975259382
Запрыгнула в последний вагон! Попалась любимая Муза! 😏 #Polina_life
custom 54721192709241225198custom 51909496449133781985custom 51908246012355069274
Писательский голос — это не что-то таинственное и неуловимое, что есть у других, а у вас нет. Это не "находится", а развивается посредством повторения. Это конкретные решения, изложенные с уверенностью в их интересности, и объяснение того, почему они таковы. СПЕЦИФИЧНОСТЬ + УВЕРЕННОСТЬ + ТОЧКА ЗРЕНИЯ = ПИСАТЕЛЬСКИЙ ГОЛОС
custom 51909496449133781985custom 51908246012355069271custom 53617216205262961611
Пу пу пу))) Готовим интервью с еще одним хедлайнером фестиваля #РыжийФест 🥰 Спойлер по личности хэдлайнера: Ее фамилия созвучна с фамилией знаменитейшего рок-музыканта. Обязательно поделюсь с вами, душнилки 🥹 #Polina_life
custom 51909496449133781987custom 51908246012355069273custom 54721192709241225193
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @polina_vinnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы относитесь к совместным чтениям?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 434,293 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| Полина Винник | Кира Рус |” (@polina_vinnik), 181 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polina_vinnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.