12 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC602 viewsread 12 August 2026
Отличный текст обеспечивает встречи, отличная концепция — продажу, отличные персонажи — работу. Все три фактора способствуют карьерному росту (с) Ф. Скотт Фрейзер
Channel
Советы Сценаристу
@screenwriterRU
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,683subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001065291325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @screenwriterRU |
| Description | Автор: @bykovkirill Работа для сценаристов: www.propero.ru |
| Created | 16 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/screenwriterRU |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 8,683 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 8,685 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 8,692 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 8,695 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 8,695 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.3%
- avg views ÷ 8,683 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,720
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (16 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,612 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 41
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 42
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Любая случайная фраза может органично вписаться в рассказываемую мной историю и двигать сюжет вперёд (с) Энрике Вила-Матас
10 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @prispeshniktopPhoto
Друзья, привет👋🏻 Я продолжаю обучать ИИ писать комедию. Хочу поделиться ссылкой на канал YouTube, куда заливаю результаты более-менее удачных генераций: https://www.youtube.com/@prispeshniktop/shorts ⭐️ Это первый в мире скетчком, целиком созданный нейросетью. Шутки, голос, видео — всё генерирует ИИ. Буду признателен за лайки и комментарии к роликам 🙏🏻
7 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 12 August 2026
Ненужные пояснения в скобках или лишние строки с описанием действий лишь создают препятствия. Они редко что-то добавляют, но создают помехи для чтения. Если персонаж не реагирует на что-то немедленно, велика вероятность, что это и не нужно. Не прерывайте диалог между двумя персонажами, если в этом нет крайней необходимости.
5 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈2,150 viewsread 12 August 2026
Наибольшее сожаление на земле испытывают те, кто почувствовал призвание к творческой работе, кто ощутил, как их собственная творческая сила пробуждается и накапливается, но не дал ей ни своей энергии, ни времени (с) Мэри Оливер
3 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 12 August 2026
Для меня каждое желание писать рождается из идеи формы (с) Сьюзен Сонтаг
31 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈4,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Писательский голос — это не что-то таинственное и неуловимое, что есть у других, а у вас нет. Это не "находится", а развивается посредством повторения. Это конкретные решения, изложенные с уверенностью в их интересности, и объяснение того, почему они таковы. СПЕЦИФИЧНОСТЬ + УВЕРЕННОСТЬ + ТОЧКА ЗРЕНИЯ = ПИСАТЕЛЬСКИЙ ГОЛОС
28 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 12 August 2026
Триллер — это единственный жанр, где абсолютно необходимо, чтобы характер персонажа определялся действием (с) Кристофер Нолан
25 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,080 viewsread 12 August 2026
Наполнить сценарий второстепенными персонажами может быть непросто. Задайте себе вопрос: • Кто верит в главного героя? • Кто считает, что он не справится с задачей? • Кто подталкивает его к совершенствованию? Каким образом? • Кто искушает его поступать хуже? Каким образом? • Кто направляет его на пути к тому, кем он должны стать? • Кто тянет его в совершенно другом направлении? Пусть сюжет диктует отношения, и тогда …
22 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC≈3,520 viewsread 12 August 2026
Я всегда сосредотачивалась на красоте мелочей — наблюдая за тем, как маленькие, но не склонные к агрессии люди выживают, проявляя изобретательность и превращая свои слабости в сильные стороны (с) Фанни Хоу
20 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC≈3,740 viewsread 12 August 2026
Секрет всего этого в том, чтобы писать в порыве, пульсации, потоке момента... тогда можно уловить само сердцебиение жизни (с) Уолт Уитмен
17 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈4,270 viewsread 12 August 2026
Сегодня я чувствую себя просто никчемным. Я использовал все возможные физические оправдания, чтобы не работать, кроме как притворился больным. Я медлил, бесчисленное количество раз ходил в туалет, выпил много стаканов воды. По-настоящему по-детски (с) Джон Стейнбек
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @screenwriterRU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 364,535 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Советы Сценаристу” (@screenwriterRU), 8,683 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/screenwriterRU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.