Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Проектный трансформатор

@pmtransform

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624118681
TypeChannel
Username@pmtransform
DescriptionО премудростях управления проектами
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pmtransform

Growth

457 August 2026 — 45 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:1545no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:0045first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.8%
avg views ÷ 45 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.3
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 March 20265 August 2026)
Views total154
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
162
Videos
4
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026

Куда катится этот мир? https://youtu.be/TYrd50seXks?t=1726

4 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yandexforproductsPhoto

📕 Я перепоручил ведение базы знаний AI-агенту — расскажу как Привет, это Толя Панов, CTO Яндекс Карт. Мы уже встречались в этом канале, я делал пост про организацию заметок. Сегодня продолжим тему. Я довольно давно веду базу знаний в Obsidian и, как любой уважающий себя «хомяк», накопил запас необработанных материалов. Это репосты и ссылки из любимых каналов в телеграме, ссылки в to-do-листе и рекомендации книг, ко

27 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вот что мне нравится в китайском метро: понятная инфографика.

23 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC31 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yandexforproductsPhoto

📌 Аудит мёртвых ритуалов: как я освобождаю команду от бесполезных встреч Привет! На связи Егор Лукинов, руководитель продукта Engagement Platofrm. Хочу поделиться простым приёмом, который помогает мне находить неэффективные процессы и не тратить на них время команды. 💻 По данным опроса Atlassian, 78% участников отметили: им приходится посещать так много встреч, что трудно успевать работать. При этом встречи не дост

20 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC25 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @khokhlovAR

Недавно Госсовет КНР принял новый пятилетний план развития образования в Китае на 2026-2030 годы. Его ключевой особенностью стал обязательный фокус на изучении искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) на всех уровнях – от начальной школы до университета. С основными идеями плана можно ознакомиться по пресс-релизу на английском языке: https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202604/10/content_WS69d8910dc6d00ca5f9a0a554.html Согласно э

20 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

Любопытно. На досуге попробую состыковать с нашим недавним ФЗ об ИИ http://council.gov.ru/events/news/176242/

8 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @roman_cheremisinPhoto

ИИ рассчитывает критический путь Календарно-сетевое планирование и расчет критического пути – то, что с чего я начинал свой путь в управлении проектами и чем занимался огромное количество времени в течение последних 15 лет. Все это время само собой подразумевалось, что для работы нужно специальное ПО – в моей практике это была в основном Oracle Primavera. И вот, похоже, наступает революция – расчет критического пу

8 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026

Вот и Черемисин говорит, что «с наскока не получится». А так хотелось избавиться от этих методологов и планировщиков.

17 Jun 2026, 08:22 UTC38 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#книжечки Наконец добрался до книжки Марти Кагана «Вдохновленные», которую мне советовали как маст-рид для продакта. Что выписал: • +1 в пользу итеративной разработки • 50% идей уйдут в стол • 4 риска идеи - ценность потребителю, юзабилити (удобно ли?), тех. реализуемость, жизнеспособность (не слишком ли дорого?) • от описания фич - к описанию бизнес проблем • этапы: дискавери, разработка продуктовой командой • прави

10 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пайтон пайтон... Вот это я понимаю, пайтон.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pmtransform. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проектный трансформатор” (@pmtransform), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pmtransform.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.