Channel
@plc_khabazzadeh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001395136348 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @plc_khabazzadeh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/plc_khabazzadeh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 159 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 156 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 154 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 152 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
58 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 62.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 24.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍️ در مورد این موضوع که مجددا زیاد روش بحث میشه یک نکته تکمیلی ذکر کنم در مورد خطای شناختی اثر واگن (گله) bandwagon effect مطالعه کنید گرچه در پادکست ها و جلسات روانشناسی معامله گر بهش پرداختیم. لینک شنیداری پادکست 👇 https://castbox.fm/vb/722797849
❤4
یک اشتباه رایج این است که بعد از ضرر، به تمام مهارتهای معاملاتیتان شک کنید. #روانشناسی_معامله_گر
❤9👍1
هر پولی که با زیر پا گذاشتن قوانین معاملاتی به دست بیاید، مال شما نیست. شما به دلیل ایجاد عادتهای بد، آن را بلافاصله پس خواهید داد.
👍10❤4👏2
یک سوال از چهار هوش مصنوعی پرسیده شد 📌چرا عموم مردم در بازار های مالی شکست میخورند؟ مطالعه پاسخ جالبه:👇 https://t.me/Khabaz_Trader
طلا الان
❤3
دو پوزیشن رند،روان و زیبا. 15/7
❤1
نکته: این پوزیشن دیروزه ولی بیاته. چون کندل ورود "اول" مناسب نیست. لانگ باره. اگه این پوزیشنو، با شرط مهم نبودن نوع کندل ورود، گرفته باشی، حرجی بهت نیست.
در روانشناسی معاملهگری، بروز خشم و نفرت نسبت به بازار و مشتقات آن، اغلب ناشی از ناتوانی فرد در پذیرش ماهیت غیرقابلپیشبینی و بیطرف این ساختار است. چنین هیجاناتی، در صورت تداوم، موجب تضعیف قوهی تحلیل و برهمخوردن نظم ذهنی میشوند و معاملهگر را به سمت واکنشهای شتابزده و تصمیمهای احساسی سوق میدهند. در این شرایط، معامله از مسیر منطق و استراتژی خارج میشود و به ابزاری برای تخلیهی تنشهای روانی تبدیل میگردد. از…
🔥3
کلا این بازی ها طوری طراحی میشن که عموم مردم، به نظره من 99% مردم، بازنده ازش بیرون بیان لااقل من ندیدم!!
❤5
من شخصا از هرچیزی که در دنیای سرمایه گذاری ترند میشه اجتناب می کنم. از نظر من هر چی ترند بشه به احتمال قریب به یقین اسکم (کلاهبرداری) پنهانه از هجوم ملت به سمت بورس ایران گرفته تا پیشنهاد خرید انواع رمز ارزهای بی در و پیکر و متاورسو Nft و جدیدترینش پراپ! هر جا رفتار گله ای دیدید برگردید!
❤4👍2👎1
نمونه بک تست یکی از دانشجویان کوشا و جوان 👏👏👆
👏1🔥1
Brought to you by MobiOffice: Word, Excel, PDF Download and try it now -> https://mobisystems.com/mobioffice
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @plc_khabazzadeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ژورنال معاملات روزانه :خباززاده” (@plc_khabazzadeh), 159 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plc_khabazzadeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.