Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pit Lane Walk | Формула-1

Channel

Pit Lane Walk | Формула-1

@pitlanewalk

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,416subscribers

+281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001837090276
TypeChannel
Username@pitlanewalk
DescriptionЗдесь мы пишем о Формуле-1 - серьёзно и не очень. Еще мы проводим квизы в Москве и Питере, а также комментируем гонки в live формате. Авторы канала - @stefmoscow @kirlubantres Чат: https://t.me/plwchat
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pitlanewalk

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pitlanewalk/11396 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC@vestnikformul/574655 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC1.001.7 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vestnikformul5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutesthis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 100 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,0908,4168,2537 August 2026 — 8,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,133 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,108 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,117 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,137 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,132 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,126 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,111 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,184 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,194 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,211 subscribers29 September 2026 — 8,287 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,309 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,317 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,300 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,289 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,280 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,273 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,315 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,329 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,332 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,416 subscribers7 August 202611 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 96 days, net +281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,041–8,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:468,416+84
7 Nov 2026, 04:078,332+3
4 Nov 2026, 09:568,329+14
1 Nov 2026, 10:388,315+42
29 Oct 2026, 08:598,273-7
25 Oct 2026, 21:368,280-9
23 Oct 2026, 00:578,289-11
16 Oct 2026, 15:398,300-17
13 Oct 2026, 06:398,317+8
6 Oct 2026, 17:398,309+22
29 Sept 2026, 13:008,287+76
19 Sept 2026, 12:168,211+17
15 Sept 2026, 06:598,194+10
11 Sept 2026, 13:588,184+73
6 Sept 2026, 15:218,111-15
2 Sept 2026, 15:348,126-6
30 Aug 2026, 08:378,132-5
27 Aug 2026, 00:478,137+47
23 Aug 2026, 14:088,090-12
17 Aug 2026, 11:588,102first reading

Engagement

213 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 8,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 213 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held213 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total236,614
Reactions total10,384
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,500
Videos
≈846
Links
≈1,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 22s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,133 reactions across 211 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,65133.0%
😁4,76627.8%
🔥1,3067.62%
🤣1,0225.97%
😭6703.91%
💔5913.45%
🤡4002.33%
custom 53822196010545441273001.75%
👀2911.70%
👍2541.48%
🤯2531.48%
😱2281.33%
💯2131.24%
💅1931.13%
custom 53279580751585681581901.11%
custom 53348692315886192761240.724%
custom 52221417804760461091140.665%
😢980.572%
custom 5334660612142147706830.484%
👎640.374%
10 further kinds3221.88%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 211 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pitlanewalk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 213 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 109 posts held from the last 30 days (17.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC≈10,900 views99 reactions2 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🐐 19.11.2026 PLW QUIZ F1 МОСКВА: ВОСЬМАЯ ИГРА СЕЗОНА — АЛЬТЕРНАТИВНЫЕ ПОБЕДИТЕЛИ 📅 19 ноября, 19:30 📍 Tap & Barrel Pub (новая площадка!) 💰 800 рублей с человека Очередная игра PLW QUIZ F1 в Москве пройдет под знамёнами альтернативных легенд Формулы-1: Латифи, Сарджента и Стролла. Эти гении настолько глубоко засели в наших сердцах и умах, что не сделать квиз в их честь было бы преступлением, поэтому залетайте на игр…

🔥28🤡25custom 522214178047604610923❤15👎8

Signed Stepan Toporov

10 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,770 views104 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

🐐 🐐🐐 PLW QUIZ F1 МОСКВА! Добавили реакцию 🐐в честь героев нашего нового квиза. Как вы думаете, кого мы имеем в виду? @pitlanewalk

custom 522214178047604610991❤6🔥5custom 53279580751585681582

Signed Stepan Toporov

10 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,850 views85 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @parcfermef1Photo

🤍 | Эстебан Окон подает признаки жизни. Еще раз благодарит всех за поддержку 💔 Всем привет! Хочу от всего сердца поблагодарить вас за все ваши сообщения. Ваша поддержка очень много для меня значит. Я искренне признателен всем – фанатам, коллегам и бывшим коллегам – всем, кто нашел время, чтобы написать мне. Моя любовь к этому виду спорта по-прежнему сильна, и я рад, что могу разделять эту страсть со столькими из …

❤65😢17💔3

Signed Stepan Toporov

10 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC≈8,200 views75 reactionsread 12 November 2026

ШЕСТЬ ЧАСОВ механики Кадиллак не могли снять заклинившее колесо на болиде Вальттери Боттаса, из-за чего финн даже не стартовал в Бразилии. Это, конечно, не 43 часа, как на Гран-при Монако 2021 года, но тоже впечатляет. Особенно "везучесть" Валеры @pitlanewalk

😱62❤8🔥5

Signed Stepan Toporov

10 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC≈5,170 views126 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Если вдруг кто-то переживал за Ландо после инцидента на подиуме в Бразилии, то можно расслабиться - все в порядке: Как мое ухо? Мое ухо в порядке. Спасибо, что спросил! Проблема в том, что все такие: почему ты пошел прямо туда (к искрам)? Потому что мне шампанское в глаза попало, так что я вообще ничего не видел. Я не знал, куда иду. Думаю, люди не понимают, как больно и жжет, когда шампанское в глазах. Я не знал, …

😁95❤22😭9

Signed Stepan Toporov

9 Nov 2026, 18:52 UTC≈2,050 views153 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Санти: «Гоночный режим, ты гоняешься с Норрисом» Льюис: «Ну спасибо ребят, потерял позицию относительно Ландо» Проходит полкруга. Льюис: «Так, стоп, погоди, какого хрена? А я где вообще нахожусь?» Санти: «Я скоро тебе сообщу» Льюис: «В смысле ты не знаешь? Почему Норрис вообще впереди меня? Я что в круге позади?» Санти: «Да, мы круговые, мы круговые» Комедия @pitlanewalk

😁121🙈23❤9

Signed Kirill Lyubimov

9 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,790 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Джордж Расселл вчера @pitlanewalk

😁20❤4

Signed Kirill Lyubimov

9 Nov 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,850 views79 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Гран-при Катара и Абу-Даби видимо все таки быть. Журналисты уже получают аккредитацию Хорхе Пейро пошутил, что напишет завещание перед поездкой и купит каску в испанском военторге. @pitlanewalk

❤49🤡24😁4👍2

Signed Kirill Lyubimov

9 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,670 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Фанаты авиации и Макларен, общий сбор! Тут у нас специальная ливрея Boeing 787 Dreamliner подъехала в честь относительно недавно оформленного партнерства между командой и авиакомпанией. Первый полет состоится завтра, точка назначения - Мадрид. @pitlanewalk

❤67💔11🔥4👍1👎1

Signed Stepan Toporov

9 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,550 views86 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

А, академию. Пропустил это дополнение в потоке новостей @pitlanewalk

👍61❤25

Signed Kirill Lyubimov

9 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,600 views51 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Джордж анонсирует какой-то проект в картинге. Скорее всего собственную команду, а может и какой-то стипендиальный проект для нового поколения @pitlanewalk

❤43🔥8

Signed Kirill Lyubimov

9 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,180 views185 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @f1kekwPhoto

Пиастри и Хюлькенберг вчера слегка перестарались

😁152🔥18❤13👀2

Signed Stepan Toporov

Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @pitlanewalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сафронов из паддока
@safronovf1 · 22,840
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
BOX BOX | ФОРМУЛА-1
@box_box_formula1 · 20,181
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
Психологическая поддержка фанатов Ferrari | Формула-1
@hotlineferrari · 26,045
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Вестникъ Формул
@vestnikformul · 28,443
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
STANIZLAVSKY - ФОРМУЛА 1
@stanizlavsky · 231,922
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Гоночный Уикенд
@RacingWeekend · 26,908
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Simply Formula | Формула-1 | Автоспорт
@simply_formula · 238,867
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
🥇First Place
@first_places · 21,055
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
F1 KEKW
@f1kekw · 26,892
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
RACE JOURNAL
@racejournal · 24,244
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Формула-1 | Мемы, новости
@formuladank · 34,587
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
Башмаков о гонках
@bashmakov_v_racing · 35,231
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Формула-1 | Прямые трансляции
@f1_sports · 74,756
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Formula1
@formula1 · 49,051
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Гаснут Огни
@f1alexeypopov · 109,264
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
evgenymoto - трансляции МотоГП и ВСБК на русском!
@rumotosport · 26,494
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
MotoGP
@motogp · 49,039
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pit Lane Walk | Формула-1” (@pitlanewalk), 8,416 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitlanewalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.