Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Evkus Racing | Формула-1

Channel

Evkus Racing | Формула-1

@evkus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,656subscribers

+166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474672063
TypeChannel
Username@evkus
Created22 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/evkus

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,49017,66517,577.56 August 2026 — 17,490 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,498 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,502 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,503 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,500 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,503 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,504 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,504 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,507 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,502 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,519 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,542 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,543 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,561 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,585 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,625 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,627 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,631 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,634 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,619 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,613 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,604 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,598 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,593 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,589 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,608 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,609 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,613 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,657 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,665 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,656 subscribers17,6566 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,464–17,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:1617,656-9
15 Sept 2026, 22:0017,665+8
14 Sept 2026, 06:0117,657+44
12 Sept 2026, 11:5917,613+4
10 Sept 2026, 07:2017,609+1
7 Sept 2026, 00:3817,608+19
4 Sept 2026, 09:5617,589-4
2 Sept 2026, 19:3517,593-5
1 Sept 2026, 14:5817,598-6
31 Aug 2026, 16:0717,604-9
30 Aug 2026, 14:1217,613-6
29 Aug 2026, 12:3817,619-15
28 Aug 2026, 09:3317,634+3
27 Aug 2026, 06:4417,631+4
26 Aug 2026, 06:1417,627+2
25 Aug 2026, 08:1117,625+40
24 Aug 2026, 07:4217,585+24
22 Aug 2026, 15:5817,561+18
21 Aug 2026, 05:4417,543+1
20 Aug 2026, 07:5217,542first reading

Engagement

221 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 17,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,960
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 221 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held221 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total99,260
Reactions total2,740
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 25s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27,739 reactions across 216 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10,20736.8%
😁6,19722.3%
👍2,3998.65%
😢1,5895.73%
🤡1,2574.53%
🔥1,1664.20%
🍾6052.18%
🤯5481.98%
😱5381.94%
💅5261.90%
💯4941.78%
🗿4041.46%
😎3481.25%
🏆2881.04%
👎2760.995%
🤪2550.919%
🤬2290.826%
🤷1490.537%
💩1330.479%
💊970.35%
3 further kinds340.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 221 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,715 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 221 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 221 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evkus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 221 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.36%
3 of 221 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,630
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,770
over 218 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFG1js1B118 August 202618 August 2026
2W5zFHcyLZf112 August 202612 August 2026
2W5zFHkkSYH119 August 202619 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 221 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC≈3,010 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Интересная новая тенденция: пилоты Ф-1 всё активнее занимаются собственными командами, Норрис идёт по стопам Ферстаппена. Ну, деньги есть, да и опыт Рене Розина поможет.

🔥60👍12❤6👎1🤡1

2 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,790 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @parcfermef1Photo

💵 | Поговорим о деньгах? The Race выкатили интересную статью, где они проанализировали сколько команды в 2026 (на данный момент) потратили на обновления и развитие свои болидов. Давайте не забывать, что есть важный фактор в «гонке прогресса» – cost cap, другими словами потолок затрат. Команды очень тщательно просчитывают, сколько стоит каждая деталь и когда её лучше выводить. Например, после Гран-при Нидерландов Тот…

❤34👍7🔥4🏆1

2 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC≈3,360 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

С подачи Маши Мельниковой наткнулся на монументальный труд Formula Data Analytics про реальную мощность всех силовых установок в нынешнем сезоне Формулы-1. В отличие от ФИА, они подсчитали общую мощность и ДВС, и гибридной составляющей. И в принципе похоже на правду, но у меня вопрос — если с этим справились частные энтузиасты, почему подобные проверки казались чем-то нереальным при согласовании измерений со стороны…

❤43👍11💯5🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈3,070 views204 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @hotlineferrariPhoto

Тото Вольфф — о свободе, которую он давал Хэмилтону: «Я никогда не загонял пилотов в рамки. Помню Льюиса с его коллекцией Tommy Hilfiger — это был 2018-й. Он показал коллекцию на подиуме в Шанхае, потом успел ещё на Неделю моды в Нью-Йорке — и только оттуда полетел в Сингапур. Ники [Лауда] тогда сказал: “Не понимаю, как ты это допускаешь — через неделю гонка в Сингапуре”. Льюис предупредил, что может опоздать на п…

😁143❤30👍12🔥9🤡5👎4💩1

2 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC≈3,540 views92 reactionsread 3 September 2026

То есть в необгонной Имоле спринт проведут? Ммм жду с нетерпением, это будет потрясающий полдень субботы. Upd. Запутался в календаре на родном "Чемпе", не планировался спринт в Катаре. @evkus

🏆60❤15😁9🤬4👍2💊1🗿1

2 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC≈3,520 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @garasonoarrivatePhoto

По информации от Луки Бассо, итальянского журналиста ItaliaRacing net Гран-При Катара будет заменен на Имолу, пройдёт Гран-При 27-29 ноября Должны объявить в эти выходные Абу-Даби менять не будут Вероятно, там же и закончит свой сезон Ф2 @garasonoarrivate

❤63👍11

2 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC≈3,750 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Собственно, официоз от "Ред Булл". @evkus

😢84👍7❤4🔥1😁1

2 Sept 2026, 13:56 UTC≈3,770 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026

RacingNews365 и ван Харен дружно сообщили, что Исак Хаджар в Монце не вернётся. Что-то мне подсказывает, что и в Мадриде через неделю мы его тогда не увидим. Так что снова пары Ферстаппен-Лоусон и Линдблад-Цунода. @evkus

🤯81👍13😢12❤7

1 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC≈4,220 views90 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fast_racing_f1

Сообщается, что Audi привезёт в Монцу новую коробку передач. Первая передача была слишком короткой, а восьмая - слишком длинной. Обновление позволит дольше удерживать двигатель в оптимальном диапазоне оборотов, хотя напрямую значительного скачка производительности не даст. Более серьёзное аэродинамическое обновление, которое изменит внешний вид машины, ожидается в Баку. Также стало известно, что Haas и Cadillac пол…

❤83👍7

1 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC≈10,200 views160 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Шокирующее обновление ливреи от "Макларена". Да, в паре мест оранжевый заменили на чёрный. А ещё собираются использовать в Монце "Макарену", которую они назвали H-wing. @evkus

❤98😁40🔥8🤯5👎4👍2💩2🗿1

1 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC≈4,750 views221 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Норрису и Хаджару на подиум в Монце точно нельзя. Вообще выглядит достаточно странно, чтобы запахло вторым подиумом Халка — после "лего" набор посуды вполне логичное продолжение. @evkus

😁194❤15🏆6🤪3💩2💅1

Showing the 12 most recent of 221 posts we hold for @evkus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTCFinal Results602 voters

Чей поул?

  1. Антонелли23%
  2. Расселл29%
  3. Леклер12%
  4. Хэмилтон5%
  5. Норрис14%
  6. Пиастри7%
  7. Ферстаппен9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTCAnonymous Poll1,290 voters approx.

Где будет Карлос Сайнс в 2028 году?

  1. В "Уильямсе"59%
  2. Не в "Уильямсе"41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTCAnonymous Poll2,170 voters approx.

Вы — Маттиа Бинотто. Меняете Хюлькенберга на Сайнса?

  1. Да (Сайнс помоложе, постабильнее в 2026-м, был в топах, побеждал, папа связан с "Ауди")33%
  2. Нет (разница невелика, Халк немец, через год всё равно желательно иметь вакансию)67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 221 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RACE JOURNAL
@racejournal · 23,700
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Вестникъ Формул
@vestnikformul · 28,056
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Гоночный Уикенд
@RacingWeekend · 26,850
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
F1 KEKW
@f1kekw · 26,188
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Формула-1 | Мемы, новости
@formuladank · 34,055
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
Психологическая поддержка фанатов Ferrari | Формула-1
@hotlineferrari · 25,734
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Формула-1 | Прямые трансляции
@f1_sports · 73,398
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Гаснут Огни
@f1alexeypopov · 108,748
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
evgenymoto - трансляции МотоГП и ВСБК на русском!
@rumotosport · 25,105
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Сафронов из паддока
@safronovf1 · 23,060
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
Formula1
@formula1 · 47,105
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
STANIZLAVSKY - ФОРМУЛА 1
@stanizlavsky · 226,045
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Simply Formula | Формула-1 | Автоспорт
@simply_formula · 232,680
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Башмаков о гонках
@bashmakov_v_racing · 34,292
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
MotoGP
@motogp · 48,291
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Асафьев Стас
@asafevstas · 235,317
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Russian Drift Series
@russiandriftseries · 75,323
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
F1UA
@f1ua_f1 · 22,626
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Evkus Racing | Формула-1” (@evkus), 17,656 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evkus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.