5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,800–4,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:54
4,810
-57
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
4,867
+49
6 Aug 2026, 19:00
4,818
+9
6 Aug 2026, 05:30
4,809
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:22
4,809
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 4,810 subscribers
Avg views / post
544
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
28 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
15,225
Reactions total
1,203
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,072 reactions across 25 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
298
27.8%
custom 5440525315401093341
149
13.9%
custom 5386441699935421618
129
12.0%
custom 5202167206137337114
105
9.79%
custom 5233302802750538882
75
7.00%
🔥
58
5.41%
custom 5474125982724013743
39
3.64%
custom 5463133018224873219
29
2.71%
custom 5231478090189792613
22
2.05%
custom 5449380056201697322
20
1.87%
😁
20
1.87%
custom 5390813130534193784
17
1.59%
custom 5386653794010436181
15
1.40%
custom 5444891372995774204
15
1.40%
custom 5325623528504988944
14
1.31%
custom 5424595011117274385
12
1.12%
custom 5233373888754256484
11
1.03%
custom 5301151977378430866
10
0.933%
custom 5359498708662626839
9
0.84%
custom 5386597169161605259
8
0.746%
4 further kinds
17
1.59%
Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока в Питере все вовсю готовятся к Флоу фесту 15 и 16 августа, мы заглядываем в конец лета и держим курс на Москву!
22 и 23 августа в Москве в шестой раз пройдет кофейный фестиваль «Чашка». И это идеальный повод запланировать отличные выходные в столице ☕️👜
На фестивале можно вживую познакомиться с обжарщиками со всей России, выбрать любимый кофе, а также открыть для себя редкие чаи и крафтовый шоколад bean-to-bar…
Как выпасть из жизни на пять часов и просто наслаждаться летом в Питере? Надо на Пикник Афишу в следующем году!
Это было круто, я даже не ожидала масштаба подготовки 🌟
Большую часть Елагина острова занял фестиваль, в котором были три разные музыкальные сцены, несколько фуд-кортов и бесконечное количество зон активностей.
Мы поиграли в «Громкий вопрос», выиграли прикольные шопперы от Pinhead, нашли фотобудку, успел…
⚡️ Друзья, это случилось! Новость, которую ждали все, кто знает и любит команду Syd’s 💚
Кажется, мы нашли идеальный повод встретиться в офисе Syd’s не по рабочим вопросам в воскресенье😁
16 августа известные импортеры зеленого кофе Syd’s открывают кофейню Big Braza и приглашают всех на этот праздник!
В программе будут каппинги, велком-дринки, подарки, отличная музыка и много вкусного кофе☕️
📅16 августа в 16:00
📍Пе…
Один тебе или два другому? ☕️
Смотрите, какая красивая посылка пришла мне от Лизы, автора канала Коферуинер!
Идея «Кофекроссинга» простая:
заварил ➳ попробовал ➳ записал впечатления ➳
по желанию передал дальше
В моем наборе два лота для идеального выходного:
☕️ Колумбия Розовый Бурбон от Camera Obscura для субботнего утра
🤩 бленд лоукаф Кении с Перу от ЮНАТ на вечер
Все впечатления записала на специальной карточ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @evgeniacoffee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@evgeniacoffee edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой метод заваривания ЮНЕСКО включили в список нематериального культурного наследия?
Воронка Origami как самый необычный8%
Френч-пресс как самый универсальный по всему миру4%
Турка/джезва как самый старый77%
Пористая воронка Cera Filter как самый редкий7%
Капсульная кофемашина как самая быстрая4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,305 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кофейная Женя из Питера☕️” (@evgeniacoffee), 4,810 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgeniacoffee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
