Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Коуч Мария Пичугина

Channel

Коуч Мария Пичугина

@pichugina_maria

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731362114
TypeChannel
Username@pichugina_maria
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pichugina_maria

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3673773727 August 2026 — 377 subscribers8 August 2026 — 377 subscribers8 August 2026 — 375 subscribers22 August 2026 — 369 subscribers6 September 2026 — 367 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 19:42367-2
22 Aug 2026, 18:48369-6
8 Aug 2026, 09:35375-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:17377no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:58377first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2029.4%
🔥1725.0%
1217.6%
❤‍🔥1217.6%
🥰68.82%
👏11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC55 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @myt360Video

💪 Если уж бежать к успеху, то только так! Эффектно, с дружной и весёлой командой Предприниматели Мытищ каждую неделю выходят на километровый забег. Не только, чтобы поддержать прекрасную физическую форму, но и чтобы мотивировать других к участию в масштабном благотворительной фестивале «Нежный ФЕСТ-2026». Вместе с бизнесменами округа пробежалась и съёмочная группа 360 👆 Подписаться на 360 Мытищи Подписаться на 36

👍51🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Засветилась вчера на Мытищинском ТВ, это очень приятно. 15 августа в Москве будет благотворительный забег «Нежный фест», в прошлом году праздник был очень классным

1🔥1🥰1

17 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC99 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tgameforumPhoto

ДЕНЬ 2! Коллеги, доброе утро! Сегодня второй день нашего Форума, и я предлагаю вам переключиться из роли эксперта, которая нам так близка, на роль владельца бизнеса. Сегодня мы будем говорить о нашем масштабе - о продвижении, привлечении клиентов, юридической и финансовой безопасности, а также о том, как нам психологически со всем этим справиться. Мы начинаем в 10.30. Вот прямо ровно). ПРИСОЕДИНЯЙТЕСЬ! А пока н

7👍5🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC88 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня выступаю на моей любимой конференции, уже через полчаса ❤️

🔥41🥰1

15 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC179 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После своего выступления ещё раз убедилась: многие эксперты ходят на нетворкинги, но не используют их возможности даже на 20%. На Летней академии игропрактиков мы говорили о том, что нетворкинг — это не про «приятно провести время» и не про обмен визитками. 3 главные мысли моего выступления: ✔️ Идите на нетворкинг с целью Не «посмотреть на людей», а понять: кого я хочу найти, сколько клиентов привлечь, какого пар

❤‍🔥7🔥3👍2

13 Jun 2026, 07:15 UTC142 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я влюбилась в Башкирию ❤️ Уфа оказалась очень тёплой. И я сейчас не про погоду. Про людей. Гостеприимных, открытых, заботливых. За несколько дней я успела поймать это ощущение много раз. Мы гуляли по городу, ездили на экскурсии, любовались природой. И в очередной раз я поймала себя на мысли, как сильно люблю путешествия не только за новые места, но и за возможность посмотреть на мир 🌍 Особенно мне запомнился Арт

👍6❤‍🔥5🥰4

5 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC161 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я — спикер на II Всероссийской летней академии «Игры, в которые играют люди» (Уфа, 6 июня 2026, кампус Евразийского мирового уровня) Это профессиональная конференция для игропрактиков, психологов, коучей и специалистов помогающих профессий. Академия — не только про игровые инструменты. Она про профессиональный рост, работу с группой, развитие внутренних и внешних навыков, обмен опытом и живую профессиональную среду

🔥72👍2👏1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pichugina_maria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коуч Мария Пичугина” (@pichugina_maria), 367 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pichugina_maria.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.