Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PerformanC

Channel

PerformanC

@performancorg_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

667subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002188369387
TypeChannel
Username@performancorg_channel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/performancorg_channel

Growth

66166766421 August 2026 — 661 subscribers22 August 2026 — 661 subscribers29 August 2026 — 664 subscribers6 September 2026 — 667 subscribers21 August 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 660–668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 04:01667+3
29 Aug 2026, 04:38664+3
22 Aug 2026, 18:13661no change
21 Aug 2026, 08:45661first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

681 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35051.4%
🔥19428.5%
👍314.55%
🥰284.11%
👏253.67%
🖕131.91%
💩111.62%
🤡91.32%
❤‍🔥50.734%
🎄40.587%
💅30.441%
😡20.294%
🤮20.294%
🍌10.147%
👌10.147%
👾10.147%
🤣10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 681 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,600 views80 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Heya there! As everyone know, it's pride month. While that is already widely known, that is something that I would not let pass by without giving it any attention here. Since we the beginning of my hobby in programming in Discord, I've seen hatred. Not for any specific group, but just prejudice everywhere. As time passed by, it became more and more angering, as it seemed to be the only source of happiness of those

48💩11🤡7🖕5💅3🤮2😡2🔥1

Signed Twkzz - The Incomplete

11 May 2026, 16:07 UTC≈1,590 views37 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Hello, everyone. An addition to the message above, of ReZygisk release: The remote updates (in-manager update) for ReZygisk will no longer include Release Candidates, and will only include stable releases from now on, ensuring no one goes to unstable versions. Win your peace, win your life. ThePedroo.

31🔥5👍1

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

10 May 2026, 23:09 UTC≈1,570 views47 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Delightful morning, dear community. The time has come, and the doors can't hold back it anymore. ReZygisk Stable Release v1.0.0 has finally arrived. A result of a thousand people's contributions for a single goal, ReZygisk SR v1.0.0 introduces the use of state-of-the-art libraries and design, wider compatibility and support, more accessible display of information and much more. Below is a more descriptive overview o

🔥3710

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

3 May 2026, 03:37 UTC≈1,330 views32 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Hello, everyone! I am proud to announce that ReZygisk Release Candidate 9 is here (and already update-able via your root manager)! Highlighting only a single fix, RC 9 is the final step to the stable release. Not a lot to say about it — but soon, we'll have plenty. https://github.com/PerformanC/ReZygisk/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc.9 Not to confuse with the rotten ones, ThePedroo.

🔥275

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

28 Apr 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,370 views16 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Good morning, everyone. We're pretty close to release date. It is our responsibility that the release goes smoothly and fully complete. An outdated README is not that. We've created a PR that targets updating the README and its translations. Following the same approach as the PR for the WebUI translations, this one will also include a deadline: Tuesday night. This will ensure that we both have time for handling i

👍16

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

26 Apr 2026, 05:14 UTC≈1,340 views29 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Good Night, everyone. We are back here in the stage to present the newest Release Candidate of ReZygisk: Release Candidate 8. Already available in in-manager ReZygisk update: https://github.com/PerformanC/ReZygisk/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc.8 With unseen levels of stability, RC 8 delivers increased stealthiness and compatibility with older versions of Android compared to the last candidate. As for the highlight of the

🔥233👍3

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

25 Apr 2026, 01:03 UTC892 views11 reactionsread 21 August 2026

INFO: Deadline for translations is Saturday night (UTC - 3).

🥰9🖕2

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

23 Apr 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,050 views19 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Hello, everyone! As we move forward to the last steps, we must ensure everything is clean and tidy — and the WebUI is no exception. Our awesome maintainer, RainyXeon, has made a PR bringing Treat Wheel's framework to ReZygisk. However, that lead to new strings being added to the WebUI. While the PR is fully complete, it still lacks updated on the strings. This is an announcement to people willing to update the tra

13👍2👏2🖕2

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

20 Apr 2026, 04:54 UTC≈1,500 views26 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Good night, everyone. One of the problems of the root community is surely: People don't research. They act without enough knowledge. And that clearly impacted ReZygisk: "Will ReZygisk use [some weird word to refer to custom linker]", " How to enforce denylist in ReZygisk?", "Will ReZygisk have an umount toggle?". So, so solve that, here is a FAQ. 1. Does ReZygisk use a custom linker Yes. ReZygisk has had a custom

22❤‍🔥2👍1🥰1

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

5 Apr 2026, 21:26 UTC≈1,370 views29 reactionsread 21 August 2026

What matters more, knowledge or happiness? You care to be aware but be at this crappiness? Might be too late to correct previous mistakes, But not to open your eyes and see these lakes. Happy Easter. Because love cure wounds.

15👏8🖕3👍2👾1

Signed Twkzz - The Lover

2 Apr 2026, 01:43 UTC≈29,000 views35 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Good day, everyone. One week later, I'm here to announce, yet again, ReZygisk Release Candidate 7. More stable than ever, it introduces important fixes and compatibility improvements. RC 7 highlights are: 1. Support to Android 17 Beta 3; 2. Modern KernelSU (v3.2.2+) support; 3. Fixed a new detection point. This brings even closer to the v1.0.0 stable release. We hope to really soon be here announcing the first ReZy

🔥28👏52

Signed Ordep

24 Mar 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,770 views22 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Hey, everyone! Hope you didn't miss me..! Well, I don't think anyone did, in fact... As the last Release Candidate was released last week! However, I come with great news: Release Candidate 6 has been released. This RC comes packed with the latest fixes and improvements; fixing support to Waydroid, and adding support to KernelSU manager when in the Private Space. As we approach to the stable release, we'll see RCs

15🤡2🥰2👍1🔥1🖕1

Signed Twkzz

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @performancorg_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PerformanC” (@performancorg_channel), 667 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/performancorg_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.